Audit 295518

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$2.87M
Findings
6
Programs
15
Organization: Regional School Unit #4 (ME)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-18

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
380798 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
380799 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
380800 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
957240 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
957241 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
957242 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
QGZRBHKJMFX5 Samantha Garnett Sias Auditee
2073454273 Casey Leonard Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: A. Reporting Entity - The accompanying schedule includes all federal award programs of Regional School Unit #4 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. The reporting entity is defined in notes to basic financial statements of Regional School Unit #4. B. Basis of Presentation - The information in the accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. 1. Pursuant to the Uniform Guidance, federal awards are defined as assistance provided by a federal agency, either directly or indirectly, in the form of grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, loans, loan guarantees, property, interest subsidies, insurance or direct appropriations. 2. Major Programs - the Uniform Guidance establishes the level of expenditures or expenses to be used in defining major federal award programs. Major programs for the School Unit are identified in the summary of auditor’s results in the schedule of findings and questioned costs. C. Basis of Accounting - The information presented in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting, which is consistent with the reporting in the School Unit’s fund financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Regional School Unit #4 has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Statement of Condition: Documentation of wage rate requirements in construction contracts and verification of certified weekly payrolls was not performed. Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Management needs to ensure that all contractors and subcontractors are submitting weekly certified payrolls and verify that they are being paid at least the prevailing wage rates. In addition, language regarding wage rate requirements must be included in the contract. Cause: When performing our compliance testing, we discovered a construction contract that did not contain the prevailing wage rate clause and that certified payrolls were not received. Effect: Employees could potentially not be paid prevailing wage rates which could jeopardize grant funding. Recommendation: Management needs to ensure that all construction contracts with contractors in excess of $2,000 have a prevailing wage rate clause and that certified payrolls are received and reviewed in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Management Response/Corrective Action Plan: As recommended, the RSU will work to identify construction projects that require documentation of wage rates and certified weekly payrolls at the onset of any such projects. The Business Department, in conjunction with the Director of Operations and the Director of Technology, will work collaboratively on any such projects to collect and review said documentation.
Statement of Condition: Documentation of wage rate requirements in construction contracts and verification of certified weekly payrolls was not performed. Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Management needs to ensure that all contractors and subcontractors are submitting weekly certified payrolls and verify that they are being paid at least the prevailing wage rates. In addition, language regarding wage rate requirements must be included in the contract. Cause: When performing our compliance testing, we discovered a construction contract that did not contain the prevailing wage rate clause and that certified payrolls were not received. Effect: Employees could potentially not be paid prevailing wage rates which could jeopardize grant funding. Recommendation: Management needs to ensure that all construction contracts with contractors in excess of $2,000 have a prevailing wage rate clause and that certified payrolls are received and reviewed in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Management Response/Corrective Action Plan: As recommended, the RSU will work to identify construction projects that require documentation of wage rates and certified weekly payrolls at the onset of any such projects. The Business Department, in conjunction with the Director of Operations and the Director of Technology, will work collaboratively on any such projects to collect and review said documentation.
Statement of Condition: Documentation of wage rate requirements in construction contracts and verification of certified weekly payrolls was not performed. Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Management needs to ensure that all contractors and subcontractors are submitting weekly certified payrolls and verify that they are being paid at least the prevailing wage rates. In addition, language regarding wage rate requirements must be included in the contract. Cause: When performing our compliance testing, we discovered a construction contract that did not contain the prevailing wage rate clause and that certified payrolls were not received. Effect: Employees could potentially not be paid prevailing wage rates which could jeopardize grant funding. Recommendation: Management needs to ensure that all construction contracts with contractors in excess of $2,000 have a prevailing wage rate clause and that certified payrolls are received and reviewed in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Management Response/Corrective Action Plan: As recommended, the RSU will work to identify construction projects that require documentation of wage rates and certified weekly payrolls at the onset of any such projects. The Business Department, in conjunction with the Director of Operations and the Director of Technology, will work collaboratively on any such projects to collect and review said documentation.
Statement of Condition: Documentation of wage rate requirements in construction contracts and verification of certified weekly payrolls was not performed. Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Management needs to ensure that all contractors and subcontractors are submitting weekly certified payrolls and verify that they are being paid at least the prevailing wage rates. In addition, language regarding wage rate requirements must be included in the contract. Cause: When performing our compliance testing, we discovered a construction contract that did not contain the prevailing wage rate clause and that certified payrolls were not received. Effect: Employees could potentially not be paid prevailing wage rates which could jeopardize grant funding. Recommendation: Management needs to ensure that all construction contracts with contractors in excess of $2,000 have a prevailing wage rate clause and that certified payrolls are received and reviewed in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Management Response/Corrective Action Plan: As recommended, the RSU will work to identify construction projects that require documentation of wage rates and certified weekly payrolls at the onset of any such projects. The Business Department, in conjunction with the Director of Operations and the Director of Technology, will work collaboratively on any such projects to collect and review said documentation.
Statement of Condition: Documentation of wage rate requirements in construction contracts and verification of certified weekly payrolls was not performed. Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Management needs to ensure that all contractors and subcontractors are submitting weekly certified payrolls and verify that they are being paid at least the prevailing wage rates. In addition, language regarding wage rate requirements must be included in the contract. Cause: When performing our compliance testing, we discovered a construction contract that did not contain the prevailing wage rate clause and that certified payrolls were not received. Effect: Employees could potentially not be paid prevailing wage rates which could jeopardize grant funding. Recommendation: Management needs to ensure that all construction contracts with contractors in excess of $2,000 have a prevailing wage rate clause and that certified payrolls are received and reviewed in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Management Response/Corrective Action Plan: As recommended, the RSU will work to identify construction projects that require documentation of wage rates and certified weekly payrolls at the onset of any such projects. The Business Department, in conjunction with the Director of Operations and the Director of Technology, will work collaboratively on any such projects to collect and review said documentation.
Statement of Condition: Documentation of wage rate requirements in construction contracts and verification of certified weekly payrolls was not performed. Criteria: All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor. Management needs to ensure that all contractors and subcontractors are submitting weekly certified payrolls and verify that they are being paid at least the prevailing wage rates. In addition, language regarding wage rate requirements must be included in the contract. Cause: When performing our compliance testing, we discovered a construction contract that did not contain the prevailing wage rate clause and that certified payrolls were not received. Effect: Employees could potentially not be paid prevailing wage rates which could jeopardize grant funding. Recommendation: Management needs to ensure that all construction contracts with contractors in excess of $2,000 have a prevailing wage rate clause and that certified payrolls are received and reviewed in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: None Management Response/Corrective Action Plan: As recommended, the RSU will work to identify construction projects that require documentation of wage rates and certified weekly payrolls at the onset of any such projects. The Business Department, in conjunction with the Director of Operations and the Director of Technology, will work collaboratively on any such projects to collect and review said documentation.