Audit 294777

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$1.91M
Findings
8
Programs
10
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-12

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
375714 2023-013 Material Weakness Yes B
375715 2023-014 Material Weakness - L
375716 2023-013 Material Weakness Yes B
375717 2023-014 Material Weakness - L
952156 2023-013 Material Weakness Yes B
952157 2023-014 Material Weakness - L
952158 2023-013 Material Weakness Yes B
952159 2023-014 Material Weakness - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $190,880 - 0
84.041 Impact Aid $189,384 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $150,560 Yes 2
10.553 School Breakfast Program $66,606 - 0
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants $34,995 - 0
10.559 Summer Food Service Program for Children $32,083 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $31,065 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $12,972 - 0
45.310 Grants to States $3,456 - 0
10.649 Pandemic Ebt Administrative Costs $1,281 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZWMMGX2LBP29 Christina Vetromile Auditee
7196832700 Thomas G. Sistare Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified-accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: El Paso County School District #22 has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of El Paso County School District #22 under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of El Paso County School District #22, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of El Paso County School District #22.
Title: Non-Cash Assistance Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified-accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: El Paso County School District #22 has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. During the year end June 30, 2023, El Paso County School District #22 received $31,065 in non-cash assistance in the form of food commodities. Valuation of commodities is based on fair market value at the time of receipt.

Finding Details

Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and Allowable Costs and Cost Principles for Education Stabilization Fund Federal program: ALN 84.425U&D Education Stabilization Fund Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: Colorado Department of Education Criteria: A non-federal grant recipient should set reasonable budgets for programs to minimize incentives to miscode expenses. The recipient should compare budgeted and actual allowable costs and investigate variances where applicable. Condition: While the Organization created a budget for overall activities, they did not input the budget into their accounting system or create an outside tool to track actual grant expenditures with the budget. Cause: Controls to ensure budgets are created and utilized are not properly designed or operating effectively. Effect: The District did not identify grant expenditures until after year end. Questioned costs: None noted. Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and Allowable Costs and Cost Principles for Education Stabilization Fund (Continued) Context: Testing was performed on a population size of 31. Based on our risk assessment we did tested the entire population rather than using statistical sampling. Based on our testing none of the 31 items were compared to the budget in the general ledger software. Recommendation: Management should implement procedures that include a creation of a budget for each grant award and track expenses against the budget. Additionally, we recommend that the District retain a third party firm to provide budgeting assistance. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Management agrees with this finding and is working on implementing a budget to actual reporting process as staffing allows.
Reporting for Education Stabilization Fund Federal program: ALN 84.425U&D Education Stabilization Fund Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: Colorado Department of Education Criteria: As an LEA, the LEA is required to submit certain annual financial reports to the SEA on an annual basis. Condition: While the Organization submitted the required annual financial reports, these reports did not agree to the under. Cause: Controls to ensure annual financial reports are reconciled to the underlying accounting data do not exist. Effect: The District misreported the amount of funds expended to the SEA for fiscal year 2023. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Testing was performed over the total population of required reports. Statistical sampling was not used. Recommendation: Management should implement procedures to reconcile annual financial reports to the underlying accounting data. Additionally, we recommend that the District retain a third party firm to reconcile such reports. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Management agrees with this finding and is working on implementing an annual financial report reconciliation process as staffing allows.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and Allowable Costs and Cost Principles for Education Stabilization Fund Federal program: ALN 84.425U&D Education Stabilization Fund Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: Colorado Department of Education Criteria: A non-federal grant recipient should set reasonable budgets for programs to minimize incentives to miscode expenses. The recipient should compare budgeted and actual allowable costs and investigate variances where applicable. Condition: While the Organization created a budget for overall activities, they did not input the budget into their accounting system or create an outside tool to track actual grant expenditures with the budget. Cause: Controls to ensure budgets are created and utilized are not properly designed or operating effectively. Effect: The District did not identify grant expenditures until after year end. Questioned costs: None noted. Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and Allowable Costs and Cost Principles for Education Stabilization Fund (Continued) Context: Testing was performed on a population size of 31. Based on our risk assessment we did tested the entire population rather than using statistical sampling. Based on our testing none of the 31 items were compared to the budget in the general ledger software. Recommendation: Management should implement procedures that include a creation of a budget for each grant award and track expenses against the budget. Additionally, we recommend that the District retain a third party firm to provide budgeting assistance. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Management agrees with this finding and is working on implementing a budget to actual reporting process as staffing allows.
Reporting for Education Stabilization Fund Federal program: ALN 84.425U&D Education Stabilization Fund Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: Colorado Department of Education Criteria: As an LEA, the LEA is required to submit certain annual financial reports to the SEA on an annual basis. Condition: While the Organization submitted the required annual financial reports, these reports did not agree to the under. Cause: Controls to ensure annual financial reports are reconciled to the underlying accounting data do not exist. Effect: The District misreported the amount of funds expended to the SEA for fiscal year 2023. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Testing was performed over the total population of required reports. Statistical sampling was not used. Recommendation: Management should implement procedures to reconcile annual financial reports to the underlying accounting data. Additionally, we recommend that the District retain a third party firm to reconcile such reports. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Management agrees with this finding and is working on implementing an annual financial report reconciliation process as staffing allows.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and Allowable Costs and Cost Principles for Education Stabilization Fund Federal program: ALN 84.425U&D Education Stabilization Fund Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: Colorado Department of Education Criteria: A non-federal grant recipient should set reasonable budgets for programs to minimize incentives to miscode expenses. The recipient should compare budgeted and actual allowable costs and investigate variances where applicable. Condition: While the Organization created a budget for overall activities, they did not input the budget into their accounting system or create an outside tool to track actual grant expenditures with the budget. Cause: Controls to ensure budgets are created and utilized are not properly designed or operating effectively. Effect: The District did not identify grant expenditures until after year end. Questioned costs: None noted. Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and Allowable Costs and Cost Principles for Education Stabilization Fund (Continued) Context: Testing was performed on a population size of 31. Based on our risk assessment we did tested the entire population rather than using statistical sampling. Based on our testing none of the 31 items were compared to the budget in the general ledger software. Recommendation: Management should implement procedures that include a creation of a budget for each grant award and track expenses against the budget. Additionally, we recommend that the District retain a third party firm to provide budgeting assistance. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Management agrees with this finding and is working on implementing a budget to actual reporting process as staffing allows.
Reporting for Education Stabilization Fund Federal program: ALN 84.425U&D Education Stabilization Fund Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: Colorado Department of Education Criteria: As an LEA, the LEA is required to submit certain annual financial reports to the SEA on an annual basis. Condition: While the Organization submitted the required annual financial reports, these reports did not agree to the under. Cause: Controls to ensure annual financial reports are reconciled to the underlying accounting data do not exist. Effect: The District misreported the amount of funds expended to the SEA for fiscal year 2023. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Testing was performed over the total population of required reports. Statistical sampling was not used. Recommendation: Management should implement procedures to reconcile annual financial reports to the underlying accounting data. Additionally, we recommend that the District retain a third party firm to reconcile such reports. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Management agrees with this finding and is working on implementing an annual financial report reconciliation process as staffing allows.
Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and Allowable Costs and Cost Principles for Education Stabilization Fund Federal program: ALN 84.425U&D Education Stabilization Fund Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: Colorado Department of Education Criteria: A non-federal grant recipient should set reasonable budgets for programs to minimize incentives to miscode expenses. The recipient should compare budgeted and actual allowable costs and investigate variances where applicable. Condition: While the Organization created a budget for overall activities, they did not input the budget into their accounting system or create an outside tool to track actual grant expenditures with the budget. Cause: Controls to ensure budgets are created and utilized are not properly designed or operating effectively. Effect: The District did not identify grant expenditures until after year end. Questioned costs: None noted. Activities Allowed or Unallowed, and Allowable Costs and Cost Principles for Education Stabilization Fund (Continued) Context: Testing was performed on a population size of 31. Based on our risk assessment we did tested the entire population rather than using statistical sampling. Based on our testing none of the 31 items were compared to the budget in the general ledger software. Recommendation: Management should implement procedures that include a creation of a budget for each grant award and track expenses against the budget. Additionally, we recommend that the District retain a third party firm to provide budgeting assistance. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Management agrees with this finding and is working on implementing a budget to actual reporting process as staffing allows.
Reporting for Education Stabilization Fund Federal program: ALN 84.425U&D Education Stabilization Fund Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through entity: Colorado Department of Education Criteria: As an LEA, the LEA is required to submit certain annual financial reports to the SEA on an annual basis. Condition: While the Organization submitted the required annual financial reports, these reports did not agree to the under. Cause: Controls to ensure annual financial reports are reconciled to the underlying accounting data do not exist. Effect: The District misreported the amount of funds expended to the SEA for fiscal year 2023. Questioned costs: None noted. Context: Testing was performed over the total population of required reports. Statistical sampling was not used. Recommendation: Management should implement procedures to reconcile annual financial reports to the underlying accounting data. Additionally, we recommend that the District retain a third party firm to reconcile such reports. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: Management agrees with this finding and is working on implementing an annual financial report reconciliation process as staffing allows.