Audit 294705

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$6.10M
Findings
6
Programs
7
Organization: Community Health Partners, Inc. (MT)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-03-12
Auditor: Kcoe Isom LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
375633 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - E
375634 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - E
375635 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - E
952075 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - E
952076 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - E
952077 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - E

Contacts

Name Title Type
JJEDKELTZA96 Jessica Wilson Auditee
4062221111 Megan Connors Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: 4. LOANS OUTSTANDING Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of the Clinic and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the general purpose financial statements. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented using the cost principles from Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Subpart E Cost Principles. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: For the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services grants passed through the State of Montana, the Clinic has elected to use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate from Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Subpart E Cost Principles. The Clinic received a direct loan from the United States Department of Agriculture under Assistance Listing Number 10.766, Community Facilities Loans and Grants. The ending balance of the loan outstanding at June 30, 2022 with continuing compliance requirements is $658,062.
Title: 4. LOANS OUTSTANDING Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of the Clinic and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Uniform Guidance. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the general purpose financial statements. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented using the cost principles from Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Subpart E Cost Principles. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: For the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services grants passed through the State of Montana, the Clinic has elected to use the 10% de minimus indirect cost rate from Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Subpart E Cost Principles. The loan balance at the beginning of the audit period was not included in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards in the financial statements issued on March 31, 2023. The schedule of expenditures of federal awards was revised in accordance with the requirements Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance).

Finding Details

Grant Program: Department of Health and Human Services Health Centers Cluster – Assistance Listing # 93.224/93.527 Condition: As a result of our audit procedures, we found two errors in the sliding fee category. In one instance, a patient was improperly billed for a sliding fee level they were not eligible for based on support provided with their application. In the second instance, no supporting eligibility application and income verification were maintained by the Clinic to support the sliding fee scale adjustment the patient received. Criteria: The sliding fee scale discount is based on patient income and demographic information. Controls should be in place to ensure the sliding fee scale is consistently applied for each patient. Effect: Continued non-compliance could result in a loss of funding. Additionally, it could result in improper client billing and loss of revenue. Context: During our testing, we found 2 of the 40 patients tested were not billed for the proper slide category based on the FY2022 sliding fee scale provided by the Clinic. No questioned costs were identified. Cause: The Clinic had no form of secondary review in place, resulting in the errors in billing or improper documentation not being detected and corrected in a timely manner. Recommendation: We recommend a secondary review of the applications and system input to ensure the patient is placed into and billed for the correct slide category within the software and proper documentation is verified in the electronic health records to support the slide eligibility. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
Grant Program: Department of Health and Human Services Health Centers Cluster – Assistance Listing # 93.224/93.527 Condition: As a result of our audit procedures, we found two errors in the sliding fee category. In one instance, a patient was improperly billed for a sliding fee level they were not eligible for based on support provided with their application. In the second instance, no supporting eligibility application and income verification were maintained by the Clinic to support the sliding fee scale adjustment the patient received. Criteria: The sliding fee scale discount is based on patient income and demographic information. Controls should be in place to ensure the sliding fee scale is consistently applied for each patient. Effect: Continued non-compliance could result in a loss of funding. Additionally, it could result in improper client billing and loss of revenue. Context: During our testing, we found 2 of the 40 patients tested were not billed for the proper slide category based on the FY2022 sliding fee scale provided by the Clinic. No questioned costs were identified. Cause: The Clinic had no form of secondary review in place, resulting in the errors in billing or improper documentation not being detected and corrected in a timely manner. Recommendation: We recommend a secondary review of the applications and system input to ensure the patient is placed into and billed for the correct slide category within the software and proper documentation is verified in the electronic health records to support the slide eligibility. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
Grant Program: Department of Health and Human Services Health Centers Cluster – Assistance Listing # 93.224/93.527 Condition: As a result of our audit procedures, we found two errors in the sliding fee category. In one instance, a patient was improperly billed for a sliding fee level they were not eligible for based on support provided with their application. In the second instance, no supporting eligibility application and income verification were maintained by the Clinic to support the sliding fee scale adjustment the patient received. Criteria: The sliding fee scale discount is based on patient income and demographic information. Controls should be in place to ensure the sliding fee scale is consistently applied for each patient. Effect: Continued non-compliance could result in a loss of funding. Additionally, it could result in improper client billing and loss of revenue. Context: During our testing, we found 2 of the 40 patients tested were not billed for the proper slide category based on the FY2022 sliding fee scale provided by the Clinic. No questioned costs were identified. Cause: The Clinic had no form of secondary review in place, resulting in the errors in billing or improper documentation not being detected and corrected in a timely manner. Recommendation: We recommend a secondary review of the applications and system input to ensure the patient is placed into and billed for the correct slide category within the software and proper documentation is verified in the electronic health records to support the slide eligibility. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
Grant Program: Department of Health and Human Services Health Centers Cluster – Assistance Listing # 93.224/93.527 Condition: As a result of our audit procedures, we found two errors in the sliding fee category. In one instance, a patient was improperly billed for a sliding fee level they were not eligible for based on support provided with their application. In the second instance, no supporting eligibility application and income verification were maintained by the Clinic to support the sliding fee scale adjustment the patient received. Criteria: The sliding fee scale discount is based on patient income and demographic information. Controls should be in place to ensure the sliding fee scale is consistently applied for each patient. Effect: Continued non-compliance could result in a loss of funding. Additionally, it could result in improper client billing and loss of revenue. Context: During our testing, we found 2 of the 40 patients tested were not billed for the proper slide category based on the FY2022 sliding fee scale provided by the Clinic. No questioned costs were identified. Cause: The Clinic had no form of secondary review in place, resulting in the errors in billing or improper documentation not being detected and corrected in a timely manner. Recommendation: We recommend a secondary review of the applications and system input to ensure the patient is placed into and billed for the correct slide category within the software and proper documentation is verified in the electronic health records to support the slide eligibility. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
Grant Program: Department of Health and Human Services Health Centers Cluster – Assistance Listing # 93.224/93.527 Condition: As a result of our audit procedures, we found two errors in the sliding fee category. In one instance, a patient was improperly billed for a sliding fee level they were not eligible for based on support provided with their application. In the second instance, no supporting eligibility application and income verification were maintained by the Clinic to support the sliding fee scale adjustment the patient received. Criteria: The sliding fee scale discount is based on patient income and demographic information. Controls should be in place to ensure the sliding fee scale is consistently applied for each patient. Effect: Continued non-compliance could result in a loss of funding. Additionally, it could result in improper client billing and loss of revenue. Context: During our testing, we found 2 of the 40 patients tested were not billed for the proper slide category based on the FY2022 sliding fee scale provided by the Clinic. No questioned costs were identified. Cause: The Clinic had no form of secondary review in place, resulting in the errors in billing or improper documentation not being detected and corrected in a timely manner. Recommendation: We recommend a secondary review of the applications and system input to ensure the patient is placed into and billed for the correct slide category within the software and proper documentation is verified in the electronic health records to support the slide eligibility. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.
Grant Program: Department of Health and Human Services Health Centers Cluster – Assistance Listing # 93.224/93.527 Condition: As a result of our audit procedures, we found two errors in the sliding fee category. In one instance, a patient was improperly billed for a sliding fee level they were not eligible for based on support provided with their application. In the second instance, no supporting eligibility application and income verification were maintained by the Clinic to support the sliding fee scale adjustment the patient received. Criteria: The sliding fee scale discount is based on patient income and demographic information. Controls should be in place to ensure the sliding fee scale is consistently applied for each patient. Effect: Continued non-compliance could result in a loss of funding. Additionally, it could result in improper client billing and loss of revenue. Context: During our testing, we found 2 of the 40 patients tested were not billed for the proper slide category based on the FY2022 sliding fee scale provided by the Clinic. No questioned costs were identified. Cause: The Clinic had no form of secondary review in place, resulting in the errors in billing or improper documentation not being detected and corrected in a timely manner. Recommendation: We recommend a secondary review of the applications and system input to ensure the patient is placed into and billed for the correct slide category within the software and proper documentation is verified in the electronic health records to support the slide eligibility. Management Response: See Corrective Action Plan.