Audit 293988

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$3.98B
Findings
8
Programs
33
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-03-07

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
374395 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes E
374396 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes E
374397 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes N
374398 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes L
950837 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes E
950838 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes E
950839 2022-003 Material Weakness Yes N
950840 2022-004 Significant Deficiency Yes L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.566 Nutrition Assistance for Puerto Rico $3.33B Yes 2
10.542 Pandemic Ebt Food Benefits $275.74M Yes 0
93.575 Child Care and Development Block Grant $100.64M Yes 0
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $54.12M Yes 2
93.600 Head Start $43.28M Yes 0
93.356 Head Start Disaster Recovery $37.30M Yes 0
93.658 Foster Care_title IV-E $25.44M Yes 0
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $25.33M Yes 0
93.568 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance $15.25M Yes 0
96.001 Social Security_disability Insurance $14.71M Yes 0
93.563 Child Support Enforcement $14.30M Yes 0
93.596 Child Care Mandatory and Matching Funds of the Child Care and Development Fund $9.20M Yes 0
93.667 Social Services Block Grant $8.99M - 0
93.556 Promoting Safe and Stable Families $4.13M - 0
10.568 Emergency Food Assistance Program (administrative Costs) $3.85M - 0
93.645 Stephanie Tubbs Jones Child Welfare Services Program $3.55M - 0
93.671 Family Violence Prevention and Services/domestic Violence Shelter and Supportive Services $1.72M - 0
10.649 Pandemic Ebt Administrative Costs $1.45M - 0
93.674 John H. Chafee Foster Care Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood $751,747 - 0
93.669 Child Abuse and Neglect State Grants $448,305 - 0
93.659 Adoption Assistance $431,670 - 0
93.599 Chafee Education and Training Vouchers Program (etv) $399,767 - 0
93.434 Every Student Succeeds Act/preschool Development Grants $388,010 - 0
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $382,399 - 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $360,843 - 0
93.590 Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention Grants $254,808 - 0
93.643 Children's Justice Grants to States $127,366 - 0
93.597 Grants to States for Access and Visitation Programs $85,043 - 0
10.565 Commodity Supplemental Food Program $80,919 - 0
93.747 Elder Abuse Prevention Interventions Program $78,840 - 0
93.497 Family Violence Prevention and Services/ Sexual Assault/rape Crisis Services and Supports $74,201 - 0
93.489 Child Care Disaster Relief (a) $49,776 - 0
10.569 Emergency Food Assistance Program (food Commodities) $35,655 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
Z4M6BCUFEHJ8 Olga Colon Auditee
7872944900 Pablo Morales Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE A -BASIS OF ACCOUNTING Accounting Policies: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A summary of the significant accounting policies used by the Department in the preparation of the Schedule follows: a) The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared from the Department's accounting records and is not intended to present the financial position or results of operations of the Department. b) Disbursements are recognized in the accounting period in which they are paid. c) The Department has not elected to use the 10 percent -de minimis" indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The United States Department of Health and Human Services (the "HEIS''), the Audit Cognizant Agency. approves the rates used by the Department to allocate qualified types of expenditures from state funds to federal financial assistance programs. For fiscal years 2018 through 2022. provisional rates in the indirect cost allocation plan approved by HUB ranged from 2.8°0 to 19.5% among the different federal programs. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the -Schedule") includes the federal grant activities of the Department of the Family (the -Department") and is presented on the cash basis of accounting. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ("Uniform Guidance"). State or local government redistributions of federal awards to the Department known as "passthrough awards". should be treated by the Department as though they were received directly from the federal government. The Uniform Guidance requires the Schedule to include the name of the passthrough entity and the identifying number assigned to the pass-through entity for the federal awards received. Numbers identified as NAV are not available.
Title: NOTE B SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A summary of the significant accounting policies used by the Department in the preparation of the Schedule follows: a) The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared from the Department's accounting records and is not intended to present the financial position or results of operations of the Department. b) Disbursements are recognized in the accounting period in which they are paid. c) The Department has not elected to use the 10 percent -de minimis" indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The United States Department of Health and Human Services (the "HEIS''), the Audit Cognizant Agency. approves the rates used by the Department to allocate qualified types of expenditures from state funds to federal financial assistance programs. For fiscal years 2018 through 2022. provisional rates in the indirect cost allocation plan approved by HUB ranged from 2.8°0 to 19.5% among the different federal programs. A summary of the significant accounting policies used by the Department in the preparation of the Schedule follows: a) The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared from the Department's accounting records and is not intended to present the financial position or results of operations of the Department. b) Disbursements are recognized in the accounting period in which they are paid. c) The Department has not elected to use the 10 percent -de minimis" indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: NOTE C — CLUSTER Accounting Policies: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A summary of the significant accounting policies used by the Department in the preparation of the Schedule follows: a) The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared from the Department's accounting records and is not intended to present the financial position or results of operations of the Department. b) Disbursements are recognized in the accounting period in which they are paid. c) The Department has not elected to use the 10 percent -de minimis" indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The United States Department of Health and Human Services (the "HEIS''), the Audit Cognizant Agency. approves the rates used by the Department to allocate qualified types of expenditures from state funds to federal financial assistance programs. For fiscal years 2018 through 2022. provisional rates in the indirect cost allocation plan approved by HUB ranged from 2.8°0 to 19.5% among the different federal programs. 1 he Schedule identities some programs as clusters. A cluster of programs is comprised of federal programs With different CFDA numbers that are closely related programs and share common requirements.
Title: NOTE D - MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAMS Accounting Policies: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A summary of the significant accounting policies used by the Department in the preparation of the Schedule follows: a) The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared from the Department's accounting records and is not intended to present the financial position or results of operations of the Department. b) Disbursements are recognized in the accounting period in which they are paid. c) The Department has not elected to use the 10 percent -de minimis" indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The United States Department of Health and Human Services (the "HEIS''), the Audit Cognizant Agency. approves the rates used by the Department to allocate qualified types of expenditures from state funds to federal financial assistance programs. For fiscal years 2018 through 2022. provisional rates in the indirect cost allocation plan approved by HUB ranged from 2.8°0 to 19.5% among the different federal programs. Major programs are identified in the Summary of Auditors' Results Section of the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
Title: NOTE E - TRANSFERABILITY Accounting Policies: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A summary of the significant accounting policies used by the Department in the preparation of the Schedule follows: a) The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared from the Department's accounting records and is not intended to present the financial position or results of operations of the Department. b) Disbursements are recognized in the accounting period in which they are paid. c) The Department has not elected to use the 10 percent -de minimis" indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The United States Department of Health and Human Services (the "HEIS''), the Audit Cognizant Agency. approves the rates used by the Department to allocate qualified types of expenditures from state funds to federal financial assistance programs. For fiscal years 2018 through 2022. provisional rates in the indirect cost allocation plan approved by HUB ranged from 2.8°0 to 19.5% among the different federal programs. For purposes of the Schedule, the expenditures of the funds transferred from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (CFDA No. 93.558) to the Social Services Block Grant (CFDA No. 93.667) in the amount of $10,698,951 and to the Child Care Discretionary Fund (CFDA No. 93.575) in the amount of $2.318,106, were included in the total expenditures of the receiving program.
Title: NOTE F -RECONCILIATION WITH THE STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS Accounting Policies: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A summary of the significant accounting policies used by the Department in the preparation of the Schedule follows: a) The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared from the Department's accounting records and is not intended to present the financial position or results of operations of the Department. b) Disbursements are recognized in the accounting period in which they are paid. c) The Department has not elected to use the 10 percent -de minimis" indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The United States Department of Health and Human Services (the "HEIS''), the Audit Cognizant Agency. approves the rates used by the Department to allocate qualified types of expenditures from state funds to federal financial assistance programs. For fiscal years 2018 through 2022. provisional rates in the indirect cost allocation plan approved by HUB ranged from 2.8°0 to 19.5% among the different federal programs. The Department is the recipient of a federal financial assistance program that does not result in cash receipts or disbursements and is therefore not recorded in the Department's statement of cash receipts and disbursements.

Finding Details

Criteria: The Department is required to identity in its annual plan the population eligible for NAP benefits, In testing the propriety of eligibility determinations and disbursements for NAP benefits, the auditor shall apply the eligibility criteria established by the Department and identified in the annual plan (7 CFR section 285.3(b)(2)). 7 CFR Part 285 Section 3 - Plan of Operation. states (b) the plan of operation shall include the following, information: ( 2) A description of the needy persons residing in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and an assessment of the food and nutrition needs of these persons, The description and assessment shall demonstrate that the Nutrition Assistance Program is directed toward the neediest persons in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. We noted several files for participants of the referenced federal award were not complete to evaluate properly and conclude participantlbeneficiary was eligible. as required by the Department procedures and federal law. As a result. we could not conclude participants reviewed were eligible to receive benefits as required by the federal award. Perspective We selected a sample of forty (40) participant files as part of compliance testing regarding eligibility. Auditors noted several cases in which the following documentation was not present in participants' tiles as follows: • (2) Verification of valid ID • (2) Evidence of residence • (3) Release of information form • (2) USA Citizenship or Verification of Alien Status form • (2) No copy of Social Security ID or SAID.' verification form of participants • (2) Resource Verification Form ($5k-$15k) • (2) Determination form • (2) Notification Advice form The above documentation is required as part of the eligibility controls established in the program's state plan to prove the existence of participants. Effect: The Department may be qualifying participants who do not meet the eligibility requirements established by federal regulations. T his may ultimately result in sanctions, reduced funding. having to return monies to the federal agency. or cancellation of grants. Cause: The Department is not adhering to the established internal control procedures and not adequately documenting its evaluation and conclusion over the eligibility of participants. Recommendation: The Department must adhere to its existing internal control procedures to properly document eligibility verification procedures performed and to ensure compliance \kith federal regulations and the State Plan. All documents established by the Department to evaluate and conclude participants are eligible. need to be obtained and evidenced in the participant's file. The Department should also properly communicate eligibility verification procedures to employees and provide a clear outline as to the tasks. responsibilities_ and supervision and approval tasks for each employee within the eligibility verification process. In case any document established for verification of eligibility is temporarily waived due to specific reasons (natural disasters, pandemic, etc.) the Department should formally communicate the provisions of the temporary waiver. obtain approval of the federal awarding agency, and formal communication should be included in the participant's file. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined. Management's Response: Refer to Grantee's Corrective Action Plan_
Criteria: The Department as an eligible State has submitted to the Secretary of the t U.S. Treasury a State Plan that outlines the way the State intends to conduct the TANF program as requested by 42 U.S.C. Part 602 Section (a)( I )(A)(i). The State Plan shall set forth objective criteria for the delivery of benefits and the determination of eligibility and for fair and equitable treatment. including an explanation of how the State will provide opportunities for recipients who have been adversely affected to be heard in a State administrative or appeal process as required by 42 U.S.C. Part 602 Section (a) (I) (B) (iii). The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program State Plan of Operation for fiscal years 2021 through 2023 of the Government of Puerto Rico (the State Plan). Chapter IV-Application Process. establishes financial and non-financial eligibility requirements for applications and redeterminations; the assistance unit that will be considered for benefits and services; supportive evidence of eligibility requirements; and other eligibility factors and criteria. Condition: We noted several files for participants of the referenced federal award were not complete to evaluate properly and conclude participant/beneficiary was eligible, as required by the Department procedures and federal law. As a result. we could not conclude participants reviewed were eligible to receive benefits as required by the federal award. Perspective - We selected a sample of fifteen (15) participant tiles as part of compliance testing regarding eligibility. Auditors noted several cases in which the following documentation was not present in participants' files as follows: • (1) Participant file was not provided. • (2) Evidence of residence verification • (2) USA Citizenship or Verification of Alien Status form • (2) No copy of Social Security ID or SAIC verification form of participant • (2) Verification of valid ID The above documentation is required as part of the eligibility controls established in the program's state plan to prove the existence of participants. Effect: fhe Department may be qualifying participants who do not meet the eligibility requirements established by federal regulations. This may ultimately result in sanctions. reduced funding. having to return monies to the federal agency. or cancellation of grants. Cause: The Department is not adhering to the established internal control procedures and not adequately documenting its evaluation and conclusion regarding the eligibility of participants. Recommendation: The Department must adhere to its existing internal control procedures to properly document eligibility verification procedures performed and to ensure compliance with federal regulations and the State Plan. All documents established by the Department to evaluate and conclude participants are eligible, need to be obtained and evidenced in the participant's file. The Department should also properly communicate eligibility verification procedures to employees and provide a clear outline as to the tasks. responsibilities, and supervision and approval tasks for each employee within the eligibility verification process. In case. any document established for verification of eligibility is temporarily waived due to specific reasons (natural disasters. pandemic. etc.) the Department should formally communicate the provisions of the temporary waiver, obtain approval of the federal awarding agency. and formal communication should be included in the participant's file. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined. Management's Response: Refer to Grantee's Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: Each state shall participate in the Income ligibility and Verification System (IEVS) required by Section 1137 of the Social Security Act as amended. Under the state plan the state is required to coordinate data exchanges with other federally assisted benefit programs. request and use income and benefit information when making eligibility determinations and adhere to standardized forniat•,, and procedures in exchanging information with other programs and agencies. The Departments Local Office Procedure Manual (the -Manual."). establishes the following procedures for the exchange of information of persons receiving Social Security Benefits (BENDEX): (a) The BENDEX list is issued monthly to the Director of each Region. (b) The Regional Director sends it to the corresponding local office. (c) The list is assigned and delivered to the technicians to crosscheck the information of the list with the participants' file. (d) The technicians will make a note on the Daily Contact Form (ADSEF-106G) including the finding, date of crosscheck. and name. In the BENDEX list the technicians must write their initials and the date on which the evaluation was made. Condition: We noted several files for participants of the referenced federal award were not complete to evaluate properly and conclude participantbeneficiary vvas eligible. as required by the Department procedures and federal law. As a result. we could not conclude participants rev loved were eligible to receive benefits as required by the federal award. Perspective - We selected a sample of fifteen (15) participant files as part of compliance testing regarding eligibility. We noted several cases in which the following documentation was not present in participants" files as follows: • (2) Child Support Cooperation Agreement for non-custodial parents. (Cat. C) • (1) Evidence of' residence. (Cat. A) • (2) Verification of Valid ID. (Cat. A) • (1) Medical Certification From Specialist Form (TANF-34). (Cat. D) • (1) Participant file was not available for our review (Cat. C) The Child Support Cooperation Agreement for non-custodial parents is an eligibility requirement for all Category C participants as evidence of custodial parent's cooperation with the ASUME, administration in identifying the minor's father and establishing an alimony. The Valid Identification is an eligibility control established in the program's state plan to prove the existence of participants. The Medical Certification From Specialist Form (TANF-34) is an eligibility requirement that must be provided by applicants under category D to certify that they are incapable of compliance with work, study. or training requirements due to their mental or physical health. Effect: The Department may be qualifying participants that do not meet the eligibility requirements established by federal regulations. This may ultimately result in sanctions. reduced funding. having to return monies to the federal agency. or cancellation of grants. Cause: The Department is not adhering to the established internal control procedures and not adequately documenting its evaluation and conclusion over the eligibility of participants. Recommendation: The Department must adhere to its existing internal control procedures to properly document eligibility verification procedures performed and to ensure compliance with federal regulations and the State Plan. All documents established by the Department to evaluate and conclude participants are eligible. need to be obtained and evidenced in the participant's tile. The Department should also properly communicate eligibility verification procedures to employees and provide a clear outline as to the tasks. responsibilities. and supervision and approval tasks for each employee within the eligibility verification process. In case any document established for verification of eligibility is temporarily waived due to specific reasons (natural disasters, pandemic, etc.) the Department should formally communicate the provisions of the temporary waiver, obtain approval from the federal awarding agency. and formal communication should be included in the participant's file. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined. Management's Response: Refer to Grantee's Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements. Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Part 200.512, Report Submission. (a) General. (1) states that the audit must be completed, and the data collection form and reporting package must be submitted wiithin the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditors' report(s). or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition: The Department did not comply with the required due date for the submission of the Single Audit Report Package as a result of-systematic issues which hay e led to delays in the receipt and processing of information required as part of the Single Audit. Effect: The Department will be considered delinquent in the submission of the Single Audit Report Package and if it does not respond to follow-up procedures from federal agencies. may face sanctions such as: • Draw-Down Restrictions • Reimbursable Draw Down • Withholding a Percentage of Federal Funds • Suspension of Federal Funds • Termination of Grant Cause: During March 2020, the government of Puerto Rico declared a general lockdovvn as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic which had a significant impact in governmental agencies and businesses across Puerto Rico. delaying operations on an island-wide scale. This resulted in significant delays in the completion of the Single audits for the past fiscal periods which in turn has resulted in complications regarding filing within required deadlines. Recommendation: The Department must designate work teams amongst all relevant administrations which serve as liaisons vvith auditors and be responsible for the delivery of information and documentation to ensure compliance with due dates. The Department should maintain a clear line of communication throughout its administrations and follow up accordingly to maintain a continuous flow of information during audit procedures. In addition, the Department should request periodic follovv-up meetings with auditors to address any audit issues encountered which may affect meeting established deadlines. Questioned Costs: None Management's Response: Refer to Grantee's Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: The Department is required to identity in its annual plan the population eligible for NAP benefits, In testing the propriety of eligibility determinations and disbursements for NAP benefits, the auditor shall apply the eligibility criteria established by the Department and identified in the annual plan (7 CFR section 285.3(b)(2)). 7 CFR Part 285 Section 3 - Plan of Operation. states (b) the plan of operation shall include the following, information: ( 2) A description of the needy persons residing in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and an assessment of the food and nutrition needs of these persons, The description and assessment shall demonstrate that the Nutrition Assistance Program is directed toward the neediest persons in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. We noted several files for participants of the referenced federal award were not complete to evaluate properly and conclude participantlbeneficiary was eligible. as required by the Department procedures and federal law. As a result. we could not conclude participants reviewed were eligible to receive benefits as required by the federal award. Perspective We selected a sample of forty (40) participant files as part of compliance testing regarding eligibility. Auditors noted several cases in which the following documentation was not present in participants' tiles as follows: • (2) Verification of valid ID • (2) Evidence of residence • (3) Release of information form • (2) USA Citizenship or Verification of Alien Status form • (2) No copy of Social Security ID or SAID.' verification form of participants • (2) Resource Verification Form ($5k-$15k) • (2) Determination form • (2) Notification Advice form The above documentation is required as part of the eligibility controls established in the program's state plan to prove the existence of participants. Effect: The Department may be qualifying participants who do not meet the eligibility requirements established by federal regulations. T his may ultimately result in sanctions, reduced funding. having to return monies to the federal agency. or cancellation of grants. Cause: The Department is not adhering to the established internal control procedures and not adequately documenting its evaluation and conclusion over the eligibility of participants. Recommendation: The Department must adhere to its existing internal control procedures to properly document eligibility verification procedures performed and to ensure compliance \kith federal regulations and the State Plan. All documents established by the Department to evaluate and conclude participants are eligible. need to be obtained and evidenced in the participant's file. The Department should also properly communicate eligibility verification procedures to employees and provide a clear outline as to the tasks. responsibilities_ and supervision and approval tasks for each employee within the eligibility verification process. In case any document established for verification of eligibility is temporarily waived due to specific reasons (natural disasters, pandemic, etc.) the Department should formally communicate the provisions of the temporary waiver. obtain approval of the federal awarding agency, and formal communication should be included in the participant's file. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined. Management's Response: Refer to Grantee's Corrective Action Plan_
Criteria: The Department as an eligible State has submitted to the Secretary of the t U.S. Treasury a State Plan that outlines the way the State intends to conduct the TANF program as requested by 42 U.S.C. Part 602 Section (a)( I )(A)(i). The State Plan shall set forth objective criteria for the delivery of benefits and the determination of eligibility and for fair and equitable treatment. including an explanation of how the State will provide opportunities for recipients who have been adversely affected to be heard in a State administrative or appeal process as required by 42 U.S.C. Part 602 Section (a) (I) (B) (iii). The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program State Plan of Operation for fiscal years 2021 through 2023 of the Government of Puerto Rico (the State Plan). Chapter IV-Application Process. establishes financial and non-financial eligibility requirements for applications and redeterminations; the assistance unit that will be considered for benefits and services; supportive evidence of eligibility requirements; and other eligibility factors and criteria. Condition: We noted several files for participants of the referenced federal award were not complete to evaluate properly and conclude participant/beneficiary was eligible, as required by the Department procedures and federal law. As a result. we could not conclude participants reviewed were eligible to receive benefits as required by the federal award. Perspective - We selected a sample of fifteen (15) participant tiles as part of compliance testing regarding eligibility. Auditors noted several cases in which the following documentation was not present in participants' files as follows: • (1) Participant file was not provided. • (2) Evidence of residence verification • (2) USA Citizenship or Verification of Alien Status form • (2) No copy of Social Security ID or SAIC verification form of participant • (2) Verification of valid ID The above documentation is required as part of the eligibility controls established in the program's state plan to prove the existence of participants. Effect: fhe Department may be qualifying participants who do not meet the eligibility requirements established by federal regulations. This may ultimately result in sanctions. reduced funding. having to return monies to the federal agency. or cancellation of grants. Cause: The Department is not adhering to the established internal control procedures and not adequately documenting its evaluation and conclusion regarding the eligibility of participants. Recommendation: The Department must adhere to its existing internal control procedures to properly document eligibility verification procedures performed and to ensure compliance with federal regulations and the State Plan. All documents established by the Department to evaluate and conclude participants are eligible, need to be obtained and evidenced in the participant's file. The Department should also properly communicate eligibility verification procedures to employees and provide a clear outline as to the tasks. responsibilities, and supervision and approval tasks for each employee within the eligibility verification process. In case. any document established for verification of eligibility is temporarily waived due to specific reasons (natural disasters. pandemic. etc.) the Department should formally communicate the provisions of the temporary waiver, obtain approval of the federal awarding agency. and formal communication should be included in the participant's file. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined. Management's Response: Refer to Grantee's Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: Each state shall participate in the Income ligibility and Verification System (IEVS) required by Section 1137 of the Social Security Act as amended. Under the state plan the state is required to coordinate data exchanges with other federally assisted benefit programs. request and use income and benefit information when making eligibility determinations and adhere to standardized forniat•,, and procedures in exchanging information with other programs and agencies. The Departments Local Office Procedure Manual (the -Manual."). establishes the following procedures for the exchange of information of persons receiving Social Security Benefits (BENDEX): (a) The BENDEX list is issued monthly to the Director of each Region. (b) The Regional Director sends it to the corresponding local office. (c) The list is assigned and delivered to the technicians to crosscheck the information of the list with the participants' file. (d) The technicians will make a note on the Daily Contact Form (ADSEF-106G) including the finding, date of crosscheck. and name. In the BENDEX list the technicians must write their initials and the date on which the evaluation was made. Condition: We noted several files for participants of the referenced federal award were not complete to evaluate properly and conclude participantbeneficiary vvas eligible. as required by the Department procedures and federal law. As a result. we could not conclude participants rev loved were eligible to receive benefits as required by the federal award. Perspective - We selected a sample of fifteen (15) participant files as part of compliance testing regarding eligibility. We noted several cases in which the following documentation was not present in participants" files as follows: • (2) Child Support Cooperation Agreement for non-custodial parents. (Cat. C) • (1) Evidence of' residence. (Cat. A) • (2) Verification of Valid ID. (Cat. A) • (1) Medical Certification From Specialist Form (TANF-34). (Cat. D) • (1) Participant file was not available for our review (Cat. C) The Child Support Cooperation Agreement for non-custodial parents is an eligibility requirement for all Category C participants as evidence of custodial parent's cooperation with the ASUME, administration in identifying the minor's father and establishing an alimony. The Valid Identification is an eligibility control established in the program's state plan to prove the existence of participants. The Medical Certification From Specialist Form (TANF-34) is an eligibility requirement that must be provided by applicants under category D to certify that they are incapable of compliance with work, study. or training requirements due to their mental or physical health. Effect: The Department may be qualifying participants that do not meet the eligibility requirements established by federal regulations. This may ultimately result in sanctions. reduced funding. having to return monies to the federal agency. or cancellation of grants. Cause: The Department is not adhering to the established internal control procedures and not adequately documenting its evaluation and conclusion over the eligibility of participants. Recommendation: The Department must adhere to its existing internal control procedures to properly document eligibility verification procedures performed and to ensure compliance with federal regulations and the State Plan. All documents established by the Department to evaluate and conclude participants are eligible. need to be obtained and evidenced in the participant's tile. The Department should also properly communicate eligibility verification procedures to employees and provide a clear outline as to the tasks. responsibilities. and supervision and approval tasks for each employee within the eligibility verification process. In case any document established for verification of eligibility is temporarily waived due to specific reasons (natural disasters, pandemic, etc.) the Department should formally communicate the provisions of the temporary waiver, obtain approval from the federal awarding agency. and formal communication should be included in the participant's file. Questioned Costs: Could not be determined. Management's Response: Refer to Grantee's Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: Uniform Administrative Requirements. Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Part 200.512, Report Submission. (a) General. (1) states that the audit must be completed, and the data collection form and reporting package must be submitted wiithin the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditors' report(s). or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition: The Department did not comply with the required due date for the submission of the Single Audit Report Package as a result of-systematic issues which hay e led to delays in the receipt and processing of information required as part of the Single Audit. Effect: The Department will be considered delinquent in the submission of the Single Audit Report Package and if it does not respond to follow-up procedures from federal agencies. may face sanctions such as: • Draw-Down Restrictions • Reimbursable Draw Down • Withholding a Percentage of Federal Funds • Suspension of Federal Funds • Termination of Grant Cause: During March 2020, the government of Puerto Rico declared a general lockdovvn as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic which had a significant impact in governmental agencies and businesses across Puerto Rico. delaying operations on an island-wide scale. This resulted in significant delays in the completion of the Single audits for the past fiscal periods which in turn has resulted in complications regarding filing within required deadlines. Recommendation: The Department must designate work teams amongst all relevant administrations which serve as liaisons vvith auditors and be responsible for the delivery of information and documentation to ensure compliance with due dates. The Department should maintain a clear line of communication throughout its administrations and follow up accordingly to maintain a continuous flow of information during audit procedures. In addition, the Department should request periodic follovv-up meetings with auditors to address any audit issues encountered which may affect meeting established deadlines. Questioned Costs: None Management's Response: Refer to Grantee's Corrective Action Plan.