Audit 293830

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$170.68M
Findings
8
Programs
29
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
374261 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
374262 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
374263 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
374264 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
950703 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
950704 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
950705 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - AB
950706 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - AB

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
12.600 Community Investment $29.37M - 0
84.425 Covid-19 - American Rescue Plan -Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (arp Esser) $24.04M Yes 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $16.63M - 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $4.93M - 0
32.009 Covid-19 - Emergency Connectivity Fund Program $2.20M - 0
84.041 Impact Aid $1.74M Yes 0
10.559 Summer Food Service Program for Children $976,853 - 0
84.181 Special Education-Grants for Infants and Families $491,556 - 0
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants $452,570 - 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $427,146 - 0
21.027 Covid-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $374,109 Yes 1
84.027 Covid-19 - Special Education Grants to States $346,064 Yes 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $275,171 - 0
84.425 Covid-19 - American Rescue Plan – Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief –homeless Children and Youth $189,947 Yes 0
12.556 Competitive Grants: Promoting K-12 Student Achievement at Military-Connected Schools $185,189 - 0
84.367 Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants $155,822 - 0
84.425 Covid-19 - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (esser) Fund $122,852 Yes 0
84.027 Special Education Grants to States $92,258 Yes 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $58,958 - 0
84.371 Comprehensive Literacy Development $56,826 - 0
84.196 Education for Homeless Children and Youth $23,420 - 0
84.184 School Safely National Activities $14,330 - 0
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $11,079 - 0
84.051 Career and Technical Education -- National Program $10,925 - 0
93.434 Preschool Development Grants $9,495 - 0
84.173 Special Education Preschool Grants $9,000 Yes 0
84.425 Covid-19 - Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (geer) Fund $7,387 Yes 0
84.181 Covid-19 - Special Education-Grants for Infants and Families $6,044 - 0
10.649 Covid-19 - Pandemic Ebt Administrative Costs $5,950 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
F9ADMUHJFCD3 Krishna Bappanad Auditee
4102225200 Cheri Amoss Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 SINGLE AUDIT REPORTING ENTITY Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance for all awards. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Board has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule or SEFA) includes the federal award activity of the Board of Education of Anne Arundel County under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance).
Title: NOTE 3 RELATION TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FEDERAL FINANCIAL REPORTS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance for all awards. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Board has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. Amounts reported in the accompanying SEFA agree with amounts reported in the Board’s basic financial statements and the related federal financial reports submitted by the Board. Total expenditures per the SEFA reconciles to the Board’s basic financial statements as follows: See the Notes to the SEFA for chart/table

Finding Details

Finding Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Award Information: 211874 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR section 200.403 states, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: For one of sixty transactions selected for testing, Anne Arundel County Board of Education (the Board) was unable to provide documentation supporting that the payment was allowable under the program. The invoice supporting an employee reimbursement for summer baking/cooking camp could not be provided. Questioned Costs: $31.93, the amount of the unsupported employee reimbursement. Cause: The Board’s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it maintained documentation supporting employee reimbursements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure that it maintains documentation supporting employee reimbursements and that this documentation is readily available for audit. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. AACPS acknowledges that a receipt supporting the $31.93 purchase could not be located. AACPS made several attempts during the single audit's development phase to procure the receipt from the employee, but without success. Throughout the audit, the teacher furnished a detailed account of the purchased items and the purpose behind it. Nevertheless, the supervisor had sanctioned the purchase, the teacher provided a valid reason for the missing receipt, and the amount was negligible. The principal had initially approved the purchase, and supervisor authorization is standard procedure for all purchases, either before or after the transaction. Therefore, AACPS believes this finding should be considered immaterial and requests its exclusion from the single audit report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Award Information: 211874 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR section 200.403 states, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: For one of sixty transactions selected for testing, Anne Arundel County Board of Education (the Board) was unable to provide documentation supporting that the payment was allowable under the program. The invoice supporting an employee reimbursement for summer baking/cooking camp could not be provided. Questioned Costs: $31.93, the amount of the unsupported employee reimbursement. Cause: The Board’s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it maintained documentation supporting employee reimbursements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure that it maintains documentation supporting employee reimbursements and that this documentation is readily available for audit. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. AACPS acknowledges that a receipt supporting the $31.93 purchase could not be located. AACPS made several attempts during the single audit's development phase to procure the receipt from the employee, but without success. Throughout the audit, the teacher furnished a detailed account of the purchased items and the purpose behind it. Nevertheless, the supervisor had sanctioned the purchase, the teacher provided a valid reason for the missing receipt, and the amount was negligible. The principal had initially approved the purchase, and supervisor authorization is standard procedure for all purchases, either before or after the transaction. Therefore, AACPS believes this finding should be considered immaterial and requests its exclusion from the single audit report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Award Information: 211874 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR section 200.403 states, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: For one of sixty transactions selected for testing, Anne Arundel County Board of Education (the Board) was unable to provide documentation supporting that the payment was allowable under the program. The invoice supporting an employee reimbursement for summer baking/cooking camp could not be provided. Questioned Costs: $31.93, the amount of the unsupported employee reimbursement. Cause: The Board’s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it maintained documentation supporting employee reimbursements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure that it maintains documentation supporting employee reimbursements and that this documentation is readily available for audit. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. AACPS acknowledges that a receipt supporting the $31.93 purchase could not be located. AACPS made several attempts during the single audit's development phase to procure the receipt from the employee, but without success. Throughout the audit, the teacher furnished a detailed account of the purchased items and the purpose behind it. Nevertheless, the supervisor had sanctioned the purchase, the teacher provided a valid reason for the missing receipt, and the amount was negligible. The principal had initially approved the purchase, and supervisor authorization is standard procedure for all purchases, either before or after the transaction. Therefore, AACPS believes this finding should be considered immaterial and requests its exclusion from the single audit report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Award Information: 211874 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR section 200.403 states, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: For one of sixty transactions selected for testing, Anne Arundel County Board of Education (the Board) was unable to provide documentation supporting that the payment was allowable under the program. The invoice supporting an employee reimbursement for summer baking/cooking camp could not be provided. Questioned Costs: $31.93, the amount of the unsupported employee reimbursement. Cause: The Board’s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it maintained documentation supporting employee reimbursements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure that it maintains documentation supporting employee reimbursements and that this documentation is readily available for audit. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. AACPS acknowledges that a receipt supporting the $31.93 purchase could not be located. AACPS made several attempts during the single audit's development phase to procure the receipt from the employee, but without success. Throughout the audit, the teacher furnished a detailed account of the purchased items and the purpose behind it. Nevertheless, the supervisor had sanctioned the purchase, the teacher provided a valid reason for the missing receipt, and the amount was negligible. The principal had initially approved the purchase, and supervisor authorization is standard procedure for all purchases, either before or after the transaction. Therefore, AACPS believes this finding should be considered immaterial and requests its exclusion from the single audit report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Award Information: 211874 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR section 200.403 states, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: For one of sixty transactions selected for testing, Anne Arundel County Board of Education (the Board) was unable to provide documentation supporting that the payment was allowable under the program. The invoice supporting an employee reimbursement for summer baking/cooking camp could not be provided. Questioned Costs: $31.93, the amount of the unsupported employee reimbursement. Cause: The Board’s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it maintained documentation supporting employee reimbursements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure that it maintains documentation supporting employee reimbursements and that this documentation is readily available for audit. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. AACPS acknowledges that a receipt supporting the $31.93 purchase could not be located. AACPS made several attempts during the single audit's development phase to procure the receipt from the employee, but without success. Throughout the audit, the teacher furnished a detailed account of the purchased items and the purpose behind it. Nevertheless, the supervisor had sanctioned the purchase, the teacher provided a valid reason for the missing receipt, and the amount was negligible. The principal had initially approved the purchase, and supervisor authorization is standard procedure for all purchases, either before or after the transaction. Therefore, AACPS believes this finding should be considered immaterial and requests its exclusion from the single audit report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Award Information: 211874 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR section 200.403 states, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: For one of sixty transactions selected for testing, Anne Arundel County Board of Education (the Board) was unable to provide documentation supporting that the payment was allowable under the program. The invoice supporting an employee reimbursement for summer baking/cooking camp could not be provided. Questioned Costs: $31.93, the amount of the unsupported employee reimbursement. Cause: The Board’s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it maintained documentation supporting employee reimbursements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure that it maintains documentation supporting employee reimbursements and that this documentation is readily available for audit. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. AACPS acknowledges that a receipt supporting the $31.93 purchase could not be located. AACPS made several attempts during the single audit's development phase to procure the receipt from the employee, but without success. Throughout the audit, the teacher furnished a detailed account of the purchased items and the purpose behind it. Nevertheless, the supervisor had sanctioned the purchase, the teacher provided a valid reason for the missing receipt, and the amount was negligible. The principal had initially approved the purchase, and supervisor authorization is standard procedure for all purchases, either before or after the transaction. Therefore, AACPS believes this finding should be considered immaterial and requests its exclusion from the single audit report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Award Information: 211874 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR section 200.403 states, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: For one of sixty transactions selected for testing, Anne Arundel County Board of Education (the Board) was unable to provide documentation supporting that the payment was allowable under the program. The invoice supporting an employee reimbursement for summer baking/cooking camp could not be provided. Questioned Costs: $31.93, the amount of the unsupported employee reimbursement. Cause: The Board’s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it maintained documentation supporting employee reimbursements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure that it maintains documentation supporting employee reimbursements and that this documentation is readily available for audit. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. AACPS acknowledges that a receipt supporting the $31.93 purchase could not be located. AACPS made several attempts during the single audit's development phase to procure the receipt from the employee, but without success. Throughout the audit, the teacher furnished a detailed account of the purchased items and the purpose behind it. Nevertheless, the supervisor had sanctioned the purchase, the teacher provided a valid reason for the missing receipt, and the amount was negligible. The principal had initially approved the purchase, and supervisor authorization is standard procedure for all purchases, either before or after the transaction. Therefore, AACPS believes this finding should be considered immaterial and requests its exclusion from the single audit report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Finding Number: 2023-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing: 21.027 Pass-Through Entity: Maryland State Department of Education Pass-Through Entity Award Information: 211874 (3/3/2021 – 12/31/2024) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR section 200.403 states, in part, except where otherwise authorized by statute, costs must meet the following general criteria in order to be allowable under Federal awards: (a) Be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the Federal award and be allocable thereto under these principles. (b) Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these principles or in the Federal award as to types or amount of cost items. (c) Be consistent with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally-financed and other activities of the non-Federal entity. (d) Be accorded consistent treatment. A cost may not be assigned to a Federal award as a direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has been allocated to the Federal award as an indirect cost. (e) Be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), except, for state and local governments and Indian tribes only, as otherwise provided for in this part. (f) Not be included as a cost or used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other federally-financed program in either the current or a prior period. (g) Be adequately documented. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Control – Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: For one of sixty transactions selected for testing, Anne Arundel County Board of Education (the Board) was unable to provide documentation supporting that the payment was allowable under the program. The invoice supporting an employee reimbursement for summer baking/cooking camp could not be provided. Questioned Costs: $31.93, the amount of the unsupported employee reimbursement. Cause: The Board’s procedures were not sufficient to ensure that it maintained documentation supporting employee reimbursements. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the error. Effect: Unallowable costs could be charged to the program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Board review its policies and procedures to ensure that it maintains documentation supporting employee reimbursements and that this documentation is readily available for audit. There is no disagreement with the audit finding. AACPS acknowledges that a receipt supporting the $31.93 purchase could not be located. AACPS made several attempts during the single audit's development phase to procure the receipt from the employee, but without success. Throughout the audit, the teacher furnished a detailed account of the purchased items and the purpose behind it. Nevertheless, the supervisor had sanctioned the purchase, the teacher provided a valid reason for the missing receipt, and the amount was negligible. The principal had initially approved the purchase, and supervisor authorization is standard procedure for all purchases, either before or after the transaction. Therefore, AACPS believes this finding should be considered immaterial and requests its exclusion from the single audit report. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.