Criteria
On May 13, 2021, ED published an additional notice for student aid public reporting under CRRSAA and
ARP, which requires that institutions publicly post certain information on their website. Institutions must
publicly post their report as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days after the publication of the notice or
30 days after the date ED first obligated funds under HEERF I, II, or III to the institution for Emergency
Financial Aid Grants to Students, whichever comes later. The report must be updated no later than 10 days
after the end of each calendar quarter (September 30, and December 31, March 31, June 30). In addition,
the U.S. Department of Education requires an annual report for HEERF grantees which is due no later than
March 24, 2023.
Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2CFR 200) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, section 303(a) states, the non-Federal entity must
establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance
that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations,
and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with
guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General
of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Condition
During our testwork over the quarterly and annual reports for the student aid portion, KPMG noted the
following:
• The September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2022 quarterly student aid portion reports were incorrectly
prepared as the College reported the student and institutional portion award grant amounts on the
incorrect lines within the report.
• There was no evidence that the quarterly or annual reports were reviewed by an appropriate
responsible official at the College before the reports were posted on the College’s website or submitted
to the U.S. Department of Education.
Cause
The condition resulted from an insufficient review of the reports by responsible officials prior to the reports
being posted to the College’s website or being submitted to the U.S. Department of Education.
Possible Asserted Effect
Failure to implement sufficient internal controls to ensure the accuracy and timely filing of these quarterly
and annual reports in accordance with federal regulations resulted in the College program being
noncompliant with federal statues, regulations and the terms and conditions of the federal awards.
Questioned Costs
None.
Statistical Sampling
The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Identification of Whether the Audit Finding was a Repeat Finding
This is not a repeat finding.
Recommendation
We recommend that the College enhance its process and controls over required federal reports to ensure,
where applicable, the following:
1) Adequate support is maintained to document that the reports are prepared and reviewed by an
appropriate individual at the College prior to posting the information to the College’s website.
2) Ensure appropriate segregation of duties between the preparer and reviewer of such reports.
3) Ensure that the reports are accurately prepared prior to being filed with the U.S. Department of
Education.
Criteria
ED Form 646-1, Fiscal Operations Report and Application to Participate (FISAP) (OMB No. 1845-0030) –
This electronic report is submitted annually to receive funds for the campus-based programs. The
institution uses the Fiscal Operations Report portion to report its expenditures in the previous award year
and the Application to Participate portion to apply for the following year.
Key Line Items – The following line items contain critical information:
Part I, Identifying Information, Certification, and Warning
Part II, Application to Participate
• Information on enrollment
• Assessments and expendituresInformation on eligible aid applicants
Part III, Fiscal Operations Report
• All sections
Part IV, Fiscal Operations Report Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG) Program
• All sections
Part V, Fiscal Operations Report Federal Work-Study (FWS) Program
• All sections
Part VI, Program Summary for Award Year
• Distribution of Program Recipients and Expenditures by Type of Student
Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2CFR 200) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, section 303(a) states, the non-Federal entity must
establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance
that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations,
and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with
guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General
of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Condition
During our testwork over the FISAP for the 2022/2023 award year, certain key information as required in
Part III, Fiscal Operations Report Section E was omitted. In addition, there was no documentation that the
FISAP was reviewed by someone other than the preparer of the report prior to the report being filed with
the U.S. Department of Education.
Cause
The condition resulted from an insufficient review of the report by someone other than the preparer of the
report prior to the report being filed with the U.S. Department of Education.
Possible Asserted Effect
Failure to file accurate and complete information in accordance with federal requirements and implement
sufficient internal controls resulted in the College’s FISAP for the 2022/2023 award year being
noncompliant with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the awards.
Questioned Costs
None. Statistical Sampling
The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample.
Identification of Whether the Audit Finding was a Repeat Finding
This is not a repeat finding.
Recommendation
We recommend the College review and enhance its process related to the preparation and review of the
FISAP to ensure that it is completely and accurately prepared prior to the report being filed with the U.S.
Department of Education.
Criteria
Institutions submit Direct Loan, Pell Grant, TEACH Grant, and IASG origination records and disbursement
records to the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) system. Origination records can be sent well
in advance of any disbursements, as early as the institution chooses to submit them for any student the
institution reasonably believes will be eligible for a payment. The disbursement record reports the actual
disbursement date, amount of the disbursement, enrollment dates, and the cost of attendance. ED
processes origination and/or disbursement records and returns acknowledgments to the institution. The
acknowledgments identify the processing status of each record: Rejected, Accepted with Corrections, or
Accepted.
Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2CFR 200) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, section 303(a) states, the non-Federal entity must
establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance
that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations,
and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with
guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General
of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition
In testing the origination and disbursement data, key items to test on origination records, if applicable, are:
Social Security number, award amount, enrollment date, verification status code, transaction number, cost
of attendance, and academic calendar.
During our testwork over the key items on origination records as reported on COD, KPMG identified the
following:
• 15 of the 40 students selected for testwork had cost of attendance amounts that did not agree to the
College’s records.
• 6 of the 40 students selected for testwork had academic start or end dates that did not agree to the
College’s records.
None of the items that were exceptions described above resulted in changes to the amounts awarded or
disbursed to students by the College for the current fiscal year.
Cause
The condition resulted from the College Student Financial Aid Operations Department not reporting
updated information to the COD System when changes were made to enrollment dates or the cost of
attendance of the students identified due to the College not having an adequate internal control process.
Possible Asserted Effect
Failure to provide required key item information in accordance with federal requirements and implement
sufficient internal controls to ensure the programs are operating effectively could have resulted in the
College awarding or disbursing incorrect amounts to students.
Questioned Costs
None.
Statistical Sampling
The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample.
Identification of Whether the Audit Finding was a Repeat Finding
This is not a repeat finding.
Recommendation
We recommend the College review and enhance its process related to reporting key items to the COD
System and update key fields as information may change during the awarding process to ensure that they
agree to the College’s records.
Criteria
Institutions submit Direct Loan, Pell Grant, TEACH Grant, and IASG origination records and disbursement
records to the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) system. Origination records can be sent well
in advance of any disbursements, as early as the institution chooses to submit them for any student the
institution reasonably believes will be eligible for a payment. The disbursement record reports the actual
disbursement date, the amount of the disbursement, enrollment dates, and the cost of attendance. ED
processes origination and/or disbursement records and returns acknowledgments to the institution. The
acknowledgments identify the processing status of each record: Rejected, Accepted with Corrections, or
Accepted. Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution
makes a disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported
student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. Institutions may do this by reporting
once every 15 calendar days, bi-weekly or weekly, or may set up their own system to ensure that changes
are reported in a timely manner.
Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2CFR 200) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, section 303(a) states, the non-Federal entity must
establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance
that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations,
and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with
guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General
of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Condition
During our testwork over COD reporting, KPMG identified an instance where one student’s disbursement
data was not transmitted within the 15 calendar days requirement as it was transmitted 153 days late.
Cause
The condition resulted from the College’s Student Financial Aid Operations Department not identifying that
the disbursement data had not been reported until after the 15-day period had passed.Possible Asserted Effect
Failure to provide report disbursement data timely in accordance with federal requirements and implement
sufficient internal controls to ensure the programs are operating effectively resulted in the College not being
compliant.
Questioned Costs
None.
Statistical Sampling
The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample.
Identification of Whether the Audit Finding was a Repeat Finding
This is not a repeat finding.
Recommendation
We recommend the College review and enhance its process related to reporting disbursement data to the
COD System timely.
Criteria
On May 13, 2021, ED published an additional notice for student aid public reporting under CRRSAA and
ARP, which requires that institutions publicly post certain information on their website. Institutions must
publicly post their report as soon as possible, but no later than 30 days after the publication of the notice or
30 days after the date ED first obligated funds under HEERF I, II, or III to the institution for Emergency
Financial Aid Grants to Students, whichever comes later. The report must be updated no later than 10 days
after the end of each calendar quarter (September 30, and December 31, March 31, June 30). In addition,
the U.S. Department of Education requires an annual report for HEERF grantees which is due no later than
March 24, 2023.
Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2CFR 200) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, section 303(a) states, the non-Federal entity must
establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance
that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations,
and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with
guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General
of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Condition
During our testwork over the quarterly and annual reports for the student aid portion, KPMG noted the
following:
• The September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2022 quarterly student aid portion reports were incorrectly
prepared as the College reported the student and institutional portion award grant amounts on the
incorrect lines within the report.
• There was no evidence that the quarterly or annual reports were reviewed by an appropriate
responsible official at the College before the reports were posted on the College’s website or submitted
to the U.S. Department of Education.
Cause
The condition resulted from an insufficient review of the reports by responsible officials prior to the reports
being posted to the College’s website or being submitted to the U.S. Department of Education.
Possible Asserted Effect
Failure to implement sufficient internal controls to ensure the accuracy and timely filing of these quarterly
and annual reports in accordance with federal regulations resulted in the College program being
noncompliant with federal statues, regulations and the terms and conditions of the federal awards.
Questioned Costs
None.
Statistical Sampling
The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Identification of Whether the Audit Finding was a Repeat Finding
This is not a repeat finding.
Recommendation
We recommend that the College enhance its process and controls over required federal reports to ensure,
where applicable, the following:
1) Adequate support is maintained to document that the reports are prepared and reviewed by an
appropriate individual at the College prior to posting the information to the College’s website.
2) Ensure appropriate segregation of duties between the preparer and reviewer of such reports.
3) Ensure that the reports are accurately prepared prior to being filed with the U.S. Department of
Education.
Criteria
ED Form 646-1, Fiscal Operations Report and Application to Participate (FISAP) (OMB No. 1845-0030) –
This electronic report is submitted annually to receive funds for the campus-based programs. The
institution uses the Fiscal Operations Report portion to report its expenditures in the previous award year
and the Application to Participate portion to apply for the following year.
Key Line Items – The following line items contain critical information:
Part I, Identifying Information, Certification, and Warning
Part II, Application to Participate
• Information on enrollment
• Assessments and expendituresInformation on eligible aid applicants
Part III, Fiscal Operations Report
• All sections
Part IV, Fiscal Operations Report Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG) Program
• All sections
Part V, Fiscal Operations Report Federal Work-Study (FWS) Program
• All sections
Part VI, Program Summary for Award Year
• Distribution of Program Recipients and Expenditures by Type of Student
Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2CFR 200) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, section 303(a) states, the non-Federal entity must
establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance
that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations,
and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with
guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General
of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Condition
During our testwork over the FISAP for the 2022/2023 award year, certain key information as required in
Part III, Fiscal Operations Report Section E was omitted. In addition, there was no documentation that the
FISAP was reviewed by someone other than the preparer of the report prior to the report being filed with
the U.S. Department of Education.
Cause
The condition resulted from an insufficient review of the report by someone other than the preparer of the
report prior to the report being filed with the U.S. Department of Education.
Possible Asserted Effect
Failure to file accurate and complete information in accordance with federal requirements and implement
sufficient internal controls resulted in the College’s FISAP for the 2022/2023 award year being
noncompliant with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the awards.
Questioned Costs
None. Statistical Sampling
The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample.
Identification of Whether the Audit Finding was a Repeat Finding
This is not a repeat finding.
Recommendation
We recommend the College review and enhance its process related to the preparation and review of the
FISAP to ensure that it is completely and accurately prepared prior to the report being filed with the U.S.
Department of Education.
Criteria
Institutions submit Direct Loan, Pell Grant, TEACH Grant, and IASG origination records and disbursement
records to the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) system. Origination records can be sent well
in advance of any disbursements, as early as the institution chooses to submit them for any student the
institution reasonably believes will be eligible for a payment. The disbursement record reports the actual
disbursement date, amount of the disbursement, enrollment dates, and the cost of attendance. ED
processes origination and/or disbursement records and returns acknowledgments to the institution. The
acknowledgments identify the processing status of each record: Rejected, Accepted with Corrections, or
Accepted.
Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2CFR 200) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, section 303(a) states, the non-Federal entity must
establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance
that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations,
and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with
guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General
of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition
In testing the origination and disbursement data, key items to test on origination records, if applicable, are:
Social Security number, award amount, enrollment date, verification status code, transaction number, cost
of attendance, and academic calendar.
During our testwork over the key items on origination records as reported on COD, KPMG identified the
following:
• 15 of the 40 students selected for testwork had cost of attendance amounts that did not agree to the
College’s records.
• 6 of the 40 students selected for testwork had academic start or end dates that did not agree to the
College’s records.
None of the items that were exceptions described above resulted in changes to the amounts awarded or
disbursed to students by the College for the current fiscal year.
Cause
The condition resulted from the College Student Financial Aid Operations Department not reporting
updated information to the COD System when changes were made to enrollment dates or the cost of
attendance of the students identified due to the College not having an adequate internal control process.
Possible Asserted Effect
Failure to provide required key item information in accordance with federal requirements and implement
sufficient internal controls to ensure the programs are operating effectively could have resulted in the
College awarding or disbursing incorrect amounts to students.
Questioned Costs
None.
Statistical Sampling
The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample.
Identification of Whether the Audit Finding was a Repeat Finding
This is not a repeat finding.
Recommendation
We recommend the College review and enhance its process related to reporting key items to the COD
System and update key fields as information may change during the awarding process to ensure that they
agree to the College’s records.
Criteria
Institutions submit Direct Loan, Pell Grant, TEACH Grant, and IASG origination records and disbursement
records to the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) system. Origination records can be sent well
in advance of any disbursements, as early as the institution chooses to submit them for any student the
institution reasonably believes will be eligible for a payment. The disbursement record reports the actual
disbursement date, the amount of the disbursement, enrollment dates, and the cost of attendance. ED
processes origination and/or disbursement records and returns acknowledgments to the institution. The
acknowledgments identify the processing status of each record: Rejected, Accepted with Corrections, or
Accepted. Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution
makes a disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported
student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. Institutions may do this by reporting
once every 15 calendar days, bi-weekly or weekly, or may set up their own system to ensure that changes
are reported in a timely manner.
Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200 (2CFR 200) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, section 303(a) states, the non-Federal entity must
establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance
that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations,
and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with
guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General
of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Condition
During our testwork over COD reporting, KPMG identified an instance where one student’s disbursement
data was not transmitted within the 15 calendar days requirement as it was transmitted 153 days late.
Cause
The condition resulted from the College’s Student Financial Aid Operations Department not identifying that
the disbursement data had not been reported until after the 15-day period had passed.Possible Asserted Effect
Failure to provide report disbursement data timely in accordance with federal requirements and implement
sufficient internal controls to ensure the programs are operating effectively resulted in the College not being
compliant.
Questioned Costs
None.
Statistical Sampling
The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample.
Identification of Whether the Audit Finding was a Repeat Finding
This is not a repeat finding.
Recommendation
We recommend the College review and enhance its process related to reporting disbursement data to the
COD System timely.