Audit 293198

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$3.82M
Findings
4
Programs
1
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-01

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
371928 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes E
371929 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes E
948370 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes E
948371 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.157 Supportive Housing for the Elderly $354,770 Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
N8FFNQYELTN9 David Defrain Auditee
7343431312 Justin Masters Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 3. Capital Advance Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal grant activity of East Detroit Area Non-Profit Housing Corporation (the "Project") under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards ("Uniform Guidance"). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Project, it is not intended to and does not present the net assets, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Project. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance or other applicable guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: For purposes of charging indirect costs to federal awards, the Project has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis cost rate as permitted by §200.414 of the Uniform Guidance. The Project has a Capital Advance from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Capital Advance bears no interest and is not required to be repaid as long as the Project is operated in accordance with Section 202 and the housing remains available to eligible, very low income households for a period of 40 years. The Capital Advance expires in 2033. Pursuant with the Uniform Guidance the Capital Advance expenditure is reporting at its July 1, 2022 balance, which is equal to the Capital Advance balance at June 30, 2023.

Finding Details

2023-001 – Eligibility - Tenant File Documentation Finding Type. Immaterial noncompliance; Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance (Eligibility) Federal program U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ·   Supportive Housing for the Elderly (ALN# 14.157) Criteria. Under Section 202 of the National Housing Act of 1959, Project management is responsible for performing an examination of and obtaining support for items of income, assets, and expenses, for proper calculation of tenant assistance payments of applying residents, and annual recertification and calculation of such information thereafter, and for obtaining signed and properly completed forms. Condition. Out of a sample of 6 tenant files, we noted: 1) Two out of six instances where an EIV was not run for a tenant file within 90 days of move in; 2) One out of six instances where the incorrect tenant income was used to calculate the tenant assistance payment; 3) One out of six instances where a tenant moved out and the requested overages were not adjusted for the correct time period; In addition, procedures were not in place to document the applicants, admissions, and removals to and from the tenant waitlist. Cause. Management does not appear to have sufficient internal control procedures in place to properly implement all of HUD's program requirements. Effect. As a result of this condition, certain tenant files did not contain all required supporting documentation and tenant application, waitlist, and removal history was not able to be tracked. In addition, employees did not follow HUD guideline procedures, and/or did not properly calculate the tenant subsidy in HUD Form 50059. While there were no significant differences in the amount of subsidies allowed compared to subsidies received, the lack of effective internal controls could lead to future significant noncompliance. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding, inasmuch as no unallowable expenditures were noted. Recommendation. We recommend that management should strengthen their current policies and follow a documented review process for all new and existing resident files and ensure that this review occurs on a timely basis. Further, we recommend that management ensure all proper supporting documentation is maintained in the residents' files, HUD guideline procedures be followed, and tenant subsidies be appropriately calculated. A tenant application waitlist should also be established and maintained such that applications, admissions, and removals can be documented. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this comment and has prepared a corrective action plan.
2023-001 – Eligibility - Tenant File Documentation Finding Type. Immaterial noncompliance; Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance (Eligibility) Federal program U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ·   Supportive Housing for the Elderly (ALN# 14.157) Criteria. Under Section 202 of the National Housing Act of 1959, Project management is responsible for performing an examination of and obtaining support for items of income, assets, and expenses, for proper calculation of tenant assistance payments of applying residents, and annual recertification and calculation of such information thereafter, and for obtaining signed and properly completed forms. Condition. Out of a sample of 6 tenant files, we noted: 1) Two out of six instances where an EIV was not run for a tenant file within 90 days of move in; 2) One out of six instances where the incorrect tenant income was used to calculate the tenant assistance payment; 3) One out of six instances where a tenant moved out and the requested overages were not adjusted for the correct time period; In addition, procedures were not in place to document the applicants, admissions, and removals to and from the tenant waitlist. Cause. Management does not appear to have sufficient internal control procedures in place to properly implement all of HUD's program requirements. Effect. As a result of this condition, certain tenant files did not contain all required supporting documentation and tenant application, waitlist, and removal history was not able to be tracked. In addition, employees did not follow HUD guideline procedures, and/or did not properly calculate the tenant subsidy in HUD Form 50059. While there were no significant differences in the amount of subsidies allowed compared to subsidies received, the lack of effective internal controls could lead to future significant noncompliance. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding, inasmuch as no unallowable expenditures were noted. Recommendation. We recommend that management should strengthen their current policies and follow a documented review process for all new and existing resident files and ensure that this review occurs on a timely basis. Further, we recommend that management ensure all proper supporting documentation is maintained in the residents' files, HUD guideline procedures be followed, and tenant subsidies be appropriately calculated. A tenant application waitlist should also be established and maintained such that applications, admissions, and removals can be documented. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this comment and has prepared a corrective action plan.
2023-001 – Eligibility - Tenant File Documentation Finding Type. Immaterial noncompliance; Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance (Eligibility) Federal program U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ·   Supportive Housing for the Elderly (ALN# 14.157) Criteria. Under Section 202 of the National Housing Act of 1959, Project management is responsible for performing an examination of and obtaining support for items of income, assets, and expenses, for proper calculation of tenant assistance payments of applying residents, and annual recertification and calculation of such information thereafter, and for obtaining signed and properly completed forms. Condition. Out of a sample of 6 tenant files, we noted: 1) Two out of six instances where an EIV was not run for a tenant file within 90 days of move in; 2) One out of six instances where the incorrect tenant income was used to calculate the tenant assistance payment; 3) One out of six instances where a tenant moved out and the requested overages were not adjusted for the correct time period; In addition, procedures were not in place to document the applicants, admissions, and removals to and from the tenant waitlist. Cause. Management does not appear to have sufficient internal control procedures in place to properly implement all of HUD's program requirements. Effect. As a result of this condition, certain tenant files did not contain all required supporting documentation and tenant application, waitlist, and removal history was not able to be tracked. In addition, employees did not follow HUD guideline procedures, and/or did not properly calculate the tenant subsidy in HUD Form 50059. While there were no significant differences in the amount of subsidies allowed compared to subsidies received, the lack of effective internal controls could lead to future significant noncompliance. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding, inasmuch as no unallowable expenditures were noted. Recommendation. We recommend that management should strengthen their current policies and follow a documented review process for all new and existing resident files and ensure that this review occurs on a timely basis. Further, we recommend that management ensure all proper supporting documentation is maintained in the residents' files, HUD guideline procedures be followed, and tenant subsidies be appropriately calculated. A tenant application waitlist should also be established and maintained such that applications, admissions, and removals can be documented. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this comment and has prepared a corrective action plan.
2023-001 – Eligibility - Tenant File Documentation Finding Type. Immaterial noncompliance; Significant deficiency in internal control over compliance (Eligibility) Federal program U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ·   Supportive Housing for the Elderly (ALN# 14.157) Criteria. Under Section 202 of the National Housing Act of 1959, Project management is responsible for performing an examination of and obtaining support for items of income, assets, and expenses, for proper calculation of tenant assistance payments of applying residents, and annual recertification and calculation of such information thereafter, and for obtaining signed and properly completed forms. Condition. Out of a sample of 6 tenant files, we noted: 1) Two out of six instances where an EIV was not run for a tenant file within 90 days of move in; 2) One out of six instances where the incorrect tenant income was used to calculate the tenant assistance payment; 3) One out of six instances where a tenant moved out and the requested overages were not adjusted for the correct time period; In addition, procedures were not in place to document the applicants, admissions, and removals to and from the tenant waitlist. Cause. Management does not appear to have sufficient internal control procedures in place to properly implement all of HUD's program requirements. Effect. As a result of this condition, certain tenant files did not contain all required supporting documentation and tenant application, waitlist, and removal history was not able to be tracked. In addition, employees did not follow HUD guideline procedures, and/or did not properly calculate the tenant subsidy in HUD Form 50059. While there were no significant differences in the amount of subsidies allowed compared to subsidies received, the lack of effective internal controls could lead to future significant noncompliance. Questioned Costs. No costs are required to be questioned as a result of this finding, inasmuch as no unallowable expenditures were noted. Recommendation. We recommend that management should strengthen their current policies and follow a documented review process for all new and existing resident files and ensure that this review occurs on a timely basis. Further, we recommend that management ensure all proper supporting documentation is maintained in the residents' files, HUD guideline procedures be followed, and tenant subsidies be appropriately calculated. A tenant application waitlist should also be established and maintained such that applications, admissions, and removals can be documented. View of Responsible Officials. Management agrees with this comment and has prepared a corrective action plan.