Audit 292418

FY End
2023-08-31
Total Expended
$33.99M
Findings
44
Programs
27
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-02-27

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
370747 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370748 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370749 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370750 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370751 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370752 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370753 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370754 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370755 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370756 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370757 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370758 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370759 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370760 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370761 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370762 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370763 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370764 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370765 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370766 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370767 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
370768 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947189 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947190 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947191 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947192 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947193 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947194 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947195 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947196 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947197 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947198 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947199 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947200 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947201 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947202 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947203 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947204 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947205 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947206 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947207 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947208 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947209 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B
947210 2023-005 Significant Deficiency - B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.334 Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs $7.46M - 0
93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response $1.98M Yes 1
84.181 Special Education-Grants for Infants and Families $1.53M Yes 1
10.560 State Administrative Expenses for Child Nutrition $691,354 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $389,825 - 0
84.011 Migrant Education_state Grant Program $381,576 Yes 1
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $313,078 - 0
93.327 Demonstration Grants for Domestic Victims of Severe Forms of Human Trafficking $309,479 - 0
84.047 Trio_upward Bound $274,420 - 0
84.066 Trio_educational Opportunity Centers $271,864 - 0
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants $264,617 Yes 1
84.002 Adult Education - Basic Grants to States $215,712 - 0
84.184 Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities_national Programs $206,226 - 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $161,379 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $159,559 - 0
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $120,240 Yes 1
93.434 Every Student Succeeds Act/preschool Development Grants $118,849 - 0
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $88,670 - 0
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants $82,340 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $60,423 Yes 1
84.196 Education for Homeless Children and Youth $55,968 - 0
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $48,156 Yes 1
84.999 Esc Essa Basic Services - 6000 $43,024 - 0
93.575 Child Care and Development Block Grant $31,962 - 0
84.374 Teacher Incentive Fund $21,258 - 0
84.365 English Language Acquisition State Grants $9,083 - 0
84.325 Special Education - Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities $8,847 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
RLSVGNCNY125 Rumalda Ruiz Auditee
9569846290 Ricky Longoria Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: RECONCILIATION TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Accounting Policies: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all applicable federal and state award programs of the Region One Education Service Center (the Center). The Center’s reporting entity is defined in Note I of the financial statements. Federal and state awards received directly from federal and state agencies, as well as federal and state awards passed through other government agencies, are included on the Schedule. In accordance with TEA instructions, federal funds for the School Health and Related Services (SHARS) have been excluded from the Schedule. All federal programs are accounted for and reported in Special Revenue Funds. The Schedule is presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting. The Center’s significant accounting policies, including the modified accrual basis of accounting, are presented in Note 1 of the basic financial statements. The Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) and the State of Texas Uniform Grant Management Standards (UGMS). Therefore, some of the amounts presented in this Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Center has received a negotiated indirect cost rate from TEA and may not elect to use a de minimis cost rate of 10% as described at 2 CFR §200.414(f)—Indirect (F&A) costs. The following is the reconciliation of federal and state revenues and the Schedule for the year ended August 31, 2023. Total expenditures of federal and state awards, per Exhibit K-1 $ 38,882,410 Add: Other federal and state revenues 7,130,651 Total federal and state revenues, per Exhibit C-3 $ 46,013,061

Finding Details

Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.
Criteria and Condition: The Center’s internal controls require the payroll register to be approved once payroll has been processed but before payroll payments are issued. No documented evidence could be provided to verify that the payroll registers were approved prior to payment. Cause and Effect: Based on discussion with management, the approvals had been made with a message on Microsoft Teams. However, the Microsoft Teams chat history is no longer available to provide documented evidence that the approvals had been granted. The lack of documented evidence does not provide an audit trail to support the internal control was followed. Repeat Finding from Prior Year(s): N/A Questioned Costs: $0 Recommendation: We recommend the payroll register be signed and dated to document the approval to proceed with processing payments. The approvals should be maintained to provide verifiable evidence. Views of Responsible Officials: See management’s corrective action plan.