Audit 292346

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$867,636
Findings
8
Programs
2
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-02-27
Auditor: Mahoney

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
370639 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
370640 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
370641 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - P
370642 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - P
947081 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
947082 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
947083 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - P
947084 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - P

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $855,386 Yes 2
59.008 Economic Injury Disaster Loan $12,250 - 2

Contacts

Name Title Type
LUVBSG86L8Q9 Molly Jalma Auditee
6517899688 Marc Kotsonas Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: (1) Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. (2) Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Listening House has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of Listening House of St. Paul, Inc. (Listening House) under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Listening House, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of Listening House.
Title: Loans Accounting Policies: (1) Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. (2) Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Listening House has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Federal expenditures for the SBA Disaster Assistance Loan includes $12,250 of loan amounts used during the year. At September 31, 2022, the loan had a balance of $1,074,000.

Finding Details

Criteria – A good system of internal controls contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. Condition – The limited number of staff of Listening House does not facilitate the segregation of duties necessary to achieve a low level. Cause – Listening House’s size and budget constraints limit the number of personnel and does not allow. Effect – A material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements occurred and was not detected. Repeat Finding – Yes. Recommendation – Management, the contract accountant, and the Board of Listening House should remain involved on the financial affairs of Listening House on a regular basis to provide oversight and independent review functions and mitigate the weakness created by the lack of segregation. Auditee's comments and response – Management, the Board, and its contracted accounting staff will regularly monitor financial reports and activities of Listening House. Responsible party for the corrective action – Molly Jalma, Co-Executive Director
Criteria – A good system of internal controls contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. Condition – The limited number of staff of Listening House does not facilitate the segregation of duties necessary to achieve a low level. Cause – Listening House’s size and budget constraints limit the number of personnel and does not allow. Effect – A material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements occurred and was not detected. Repeat Finding – Yes. Recommendation – Management, the contract accountant, and the Board of Listening House should remain involved on the financial affairs of Listening House on a regular basis to provide oversight and independent review functions and mitigate the weakness created by the lack of segregation. Auditee's comments and response – Management, the Board, and its contracted accounting staff will regularly monitor financial reports and activities of Listening House. Responsible party for the corrective action – Molly Jalma, Co-Executive Director
Criteria – Organizations are required to maintain their accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Condition – During the audit, significant adjusting entries were proposed and made: • to record the interest expense for the SBA loan in the amount of $29,000. • to record $44,000 receivable for revenue • to record $330,000 of in-kind contributions received Cause – There was a breakdown in the internal controls over the review of internal financial statements. Effect – A material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements occurred and was not detected. Repeat Finding – No. Recommendation – Management and the board should establish a process for regular review of its consolidated financial statements with its contracted accountant to ensure activity is recorded in accordance with GAAP. Auditee's comments and response – Management and its contracted accounting staff will monitor financial reports and activities of Listening House to ensure proper recording. Responsible party for the corrective action – Molly Jalma, Co-Executive Director
Criteria – Organizations are required to maintain their accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Condition – During the audit, significant adjusting entries were proposed and made: • to record the interest expense for the SBA loan in the amount of $29,000. • to record $44,000 receivable for revenue • to record $330,000 of in-kind contributions received Cause – There was a breakdown in the internal controls over the review of internal financial statements. Effect – A material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements occurred and was not detected. Repeat Finding – No. Recommendation – Management and the board should establish a process for regular review of its consolidated financial statements with its contracted accountant to ensure activity is recorded in accordance with GAAP. Auditee's comments and response – Management and its contracted accounting staff will monitor financial reports and activities of Listening House to ensure proper recording. Responsible party for the corrective action – Molly Jalma, Co-Executive Director
Criteria – A good system of internal controls contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. Condition – The limited number of staff of Listening House does not facilitate the segregation of duties necessary to achieve a low level. Cause – Listening House’s size and budget constraints limit the number of personnel and does not allow. Effect – A material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements occurred and was not detected. Repeat Finding – Yes. Recommendation – Management, the contract accountant, and the Board of Listening House should remain involved on the financial affairs of Listening House on a regular basis to provide oversight and independent review functions and mitigate the weakness created by the lack of segregation. Auditee's comments and response – Management, the Board, and its contracted accounting staff will regularly monitor financial reports and activities of Listening House. Responsible party for the corrective action – Molly Jalma, Co-Executive Director
Criteria – A good system of internal controls contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. Condition – The limited number of staff of Listening House does not facilitate the segregation of duties necessary to achieve a low level. Cause – Listening House’s size and budget constraints limit the number of personnel and does not allow. Effect – A material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements occurred and was not detected. Repeat Finding – Yes. Recommendation – Management, the contract accountant, and the Board of Listening House should remain involved on the financial affairs of Listening House on a regular basis to provide oversight and independent review functions and mitigate the weakness created by the lack of segregation. Auditee's comments and response – Management, the Board, and its contracted accounting staff will regularly monitor financial reports and activities of Listening House. Responsible party for the corrective action – Molly Jalma, Co-Executive Director
Criteria – Organizations are required to maintain their accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Condition – During the audit, significant adjusting entries were proposed and made: • to record the interest expense for the SBA loan in the amount of $29,000. • to record $44,000 receivable for revenue • to record $330,000 of in-kind contributions received Cause – There was a breakdown in the internal controls over the review of internal financial statements. Effect – A material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements occurred and was not detected. Repeat Finding – No. Recommendation – Management and the board should establish a process for regular review of its consolidated financial statements with its contracted accountant to ensure activity is recorded in accordance with GAAP. Auditee's comments and response – Management and its contracted accounting staff will monitor financial reports and activities of Listening House to ensure proper recording. Responsible party for the corrective action – Molly Jalma, Co-Executive Director
Criteria – Organizations are required to maintain their accounting records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Condition – During the audit, significant adjusting entries were proposed and made: • to record the interest expense for the SBA loan in the amount of $29,000. • to record $44,000 receivable for revenue • to record $330,000 of in-kind contributions received Cause – There was a breakdown in the internal controls over the review of internal financial statements. Effect – A material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements occurred and was not detected. Repeat Finding – No. Recommendation – Management and the board should establish a process for regular review of its consolidated financial statements with its contracted accountant to ensure activity is recorded in accordance with GAAP. Auditee's comments and response – Management and its contracted accounting staff will monitor financial reports and activities of Listening House to ensure proper recording. Responsible party for the corrective action – Molly Jalma, Co-Executive Director