Federal Program
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.458)
Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.468)
Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment
Criteria
Uniform Guidance states “Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220”.
Condition
We tested two vendors for whom the City entered into covered transactions with. We noted one of the vendors was not reviewed to ensure they were not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. We reviewed Sam.gov and noted this vendor was not listed as having an active exclusion.
Questioned Costs
None.
Context
2 vendors were tested from a population of 2.
Effect
The City has in increased risk of entering into a covered transaction with a suspended or debarred vendor.
Cause
The City did not follow their procurement policy.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The City should follow their procurement policy.
Views of Responsible Officials
The City agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.458)
Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.468)
Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment
Criteria
Uniform Guidance states “Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220”.
Condition
We tested two vendors for whom the City entered into covered transactions with. We noted one of the vendors was not reviewed to ensure they were not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. We reviewed Sam.gov and noted this vendor was not listed as having an active exclusion.
Questioned Costs
None.
Context
2 vendors were tested from a population of 2.
Effect
The City has in increased risk of entering into a covered transaction with a suspended or debarred vendor.
Cause
The City did not follow their procurement policy.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The City should follow their procurement policy.
Views of Responsible Officials
The City agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.458)
Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.468)
Allowable Activities/Costs
Criteria
An entity should have internal controls in place to ensure all federal expenditures are allowed.
Condition
We tested 15 transactions for internal controls and noted 2 transactions did not have the proper
approval.
Questioned Costs
None.
Context
15 transactions were selected from a population of 17.
Effect
The City has an increased risk in using federal dollars on an unallowable activity/cost.
Cause
The City does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure all federal expenditures are being
approved.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The City should implement policies and procedures to ensure all federal expenditures are being
approved to ensure allowability with federal requirements.
Views of Responsible Officials
The City agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.458)
Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.468)
Allowable Activities/Costs
Criteria
An entity should have internal controls in place to ensure all federal expenditures are allowed.
Condition
We tested 15 transactions for internal controls and noted 2 transactions did not have the proper
approval.
Questioned Costs
None.
Context
15 transactions were selected from a population of 17.
Effect
The City has an increased risk in using federal dollars on an unallowable activity/cost.
Cause
The City does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure all federal expenditures are being
approved.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The City should implement policies and procedures to ensure all federal expenditures are being
approved to ensure allowability with federal requirements.
Views of Responsible Officials
The City agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.458)
Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.468)
Reporting
Criteria
Single audit reports need to be submitted to the federal clearinghouse within 9 months after
year end, or by 30 days after issuance of the entity’s audited financial statements.
Condition
We noted that the City’s single audit report was not submitted by the due date.
Questioned Costs
None.
Context
The City submitted their Data Collection Form late.
Effect
The City was late on submitting their single audit report.
Cause
Management oversight
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The City should implement policies and procedures to ensure their single audit report is
submitted by the due date.
Views of Responsible Officials
The City agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.458)
Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.468)
Reporting
Criteria
Single audit reports need to be submitted to the federal clearinghouse within 9 months after
year end, or by 30 days after issuance of the entity’s audited financial statements.
Condition
We noted that the City’s single audit report was not submitted by the due date.
Questioned Costs
None.
Context
The City submitted their Data Collection Form late.
Effect
The City was late on submitting their single audit report.
Cause
Management oversight
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The City should implement policies and procedures to ensure their single audit report is
submitted by the due date.
Views of Responsible Officials
The City agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.458)
Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.468)
Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment
Criteria
Uniform Guidance states “Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220”.
Condition
We tested two vendors for whom the City entered into covered transactions with. We noted one of the vendors was not reviewed to ensure they were not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. We reviewed Sam.gov and noted this vendor was not listed as having an active exclusion.
Questioned Costs
None.
Context
2 vendors were tested from a population of 2.
Effect
The City has in increased risk of entering into a covered transaction with a suspended or debarred vendor.
Cause
The City did not follow their procurement policy.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The City should follow their procurement policy.
Views of Responsible Officials
The City agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.458)
Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.468)
Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment
Criteria
Uniform Guidance states “Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220”.
Condition
We tested two vendors for whom the City entered into covered transactions with. We noted one of the vendors was not reviewed to ensure they were not suspended or debarred from receiving federal funds. We reviewed Sam.gov and noted this vendor was not listed as having an active exclusion.
Questioned Costs
None.
Context
2 vendors were tested from a population of 2.
Effect
The City has in increased risk of entering into a covered transaction with a suspended or debarred vendor.
Cause
The City did not follow their procurement policy.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The City should follow their procurement policy.
Views of Responsible Officials
The City agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.458)
Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.468)
Allowable Activities/Costs
Criteria
An entity should have internal controls in place to ensure all federal expenditures are allowed.
Condition
We tested 15 transactions for internal controls and noted 2 transactions did not have the proper
approval.
Questioned Costs
None.
Context
15 transactions were selected from a population of 17.
Effect
The City has an increased risk in using federal dollars on an unallowable activity/cost.
Cause
The City does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure all federal expenditures are being
approved.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The City should implement policies and procedures to ensure all federal expenditures are being
approved to ensure allowability with federal requirements.
Views of Responsible Officials
The City agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.458)
Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.468)
Allowable Activities/Costs
Criteria
An entity should have internal controls in place to ensure all federal expenditures are allowed.
Condition
We tested 15 transactions for internal controls and noted 2 transactions did not have the proper
approval.
Questioned Costs
None.
Context
15 transactions were selected from a population of 17.
Effect
The City has an increased risk in using federal dollars on an unallowable activity/cost.
Cause
The City does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure all federal expenditures are being
approved.
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The City should implement policies and procedures to ensure all federal expenditures are being
approved to ensure allowability with federal requirements.
Views of Responsible Officials
The City agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.458)
Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.468)
Reporting
Criteria
Single audit reports need to be submitted to the federal clearinghouse within 9 months after
year end, or by 30 days after issuance of the entity’s audited financial statements.
Condition
We noted that the City’s single audit report was not submitted by the due date.
Questioned Costs
None.
Context
The City submitted their Data Collection Form late.
Effect
The City was late on submitting their single audit report.
Cause
Management oversight
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The City should implement policies and procedures to ensure their single audit report is
submitted by the due date.
Views of Responsible Officials
The City agrees with the recommendation.
Federal Program
Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.458)
Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (AL 66.468)
Reporting
Criteria
Single audit reports need to be submitted to the federal clearinghouse within 9 months after
year end, or by 30 days after issuance of the entity’s audited financial statements.
Condition
We noted that the City’s single audit report was not submitted by the due date.
Questioned Costs
None.
Context
The City submitted their Data Collection Form late.
Effect
The City was late on submitting their single audit report.
Cause
Management oversight
Repeat Finding
No.
Recommendation
The City should implement policies and procedures to ensure their single audit report is
submitted by the due date.
Views of Responsible Officials
The City agrees with the recommendation.