Audit 291003

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$7.55M
Findings
10
Programs
8
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-02-17
Auditor: Donovan PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
369627 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - P
369628 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - P
369629 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
369630 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
369631 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
946069 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - P
946070 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - P
946071 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
946072 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
946073 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $1.22M Yes 1
10.555 National School Lunch Program $434,397 - 0
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants $96,720 - 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $80,723 - 0
84.424 Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program $65,469 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $19,650 Yes 1
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $5,551 - 0
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants $3,168 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
UVP8UVFY7B33 Eva Spilker Auditee
4105983087 Jason Schultz Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of Drexel Foundation for Educational Excellence, Inc. d/b/a Thea Bowman Leadership Academy (the “School”) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the School, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, functional expenses, or cash flows of the School.
Title: NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: NOTE 3 - INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The School elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The School elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

FINDING 2023-001 DOCUMENT RETENTION SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Title I, Part A Assistance Listing Number: 84.010 Condition The Indiana Department of Education uses data on the poverty levels of students in determining funding amounts for the program. We selected a sample of forty students from the Real Time Data report used in making funding assessments for the year under audit. The School was unable to provide documentation to support the poverty levels of ten of those students. Criteria Per 7 CFR 200.334, “Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non- Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient.” Cause The School did not maintain poverty level documentation for all students reported. Effect We were unable to determine if the poverty levels of all students were properly reported. Funding amounts could have been incorrectly determined. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls requiring the maintenance of student poverty level documentation. Views of Responsible Officials The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.
FINDING 2023-001 DOCUMENT RETENTION SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Title I, Part A Assistance Listing Number: 84.010 Condition The Indiana Department of Education uses data on the poverty levels of students in determining funding amounts for the program. We selected a sample of forty students from the Real Time Data report used in making funding assessments for the year under audit. The School was unable to provide documentation to support the poverty levels of ten of those students. Criteria Per 7 CFR 200.334, “Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non- Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient.” Cause The School did not maintain poverty level documentation for all students reported. Effect We were unable to determine if the poverty levels of all students were properly reported. Funding amounts could have been incorrectly determined. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls requiring the maintenance of student poverty level documentation. Views of Responsible Officials The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.
FINDING 2023-002 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into agreements with contractors for various construction projects paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. The School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week in which work was performed under the contract to document compliance with the David-Bacon Act. Criteria Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School was unable to document the contractors were compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.
FINDING 2023-002 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into agreements with contractors for various construction projects paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. The School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week in which work was performed under the contract to document compliance with the David-Bacon Act. Criteria Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School was unable to document the contractors were compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.
FINDING 2023-002 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into agreements with contractors for various construction projects paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. The School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week in which work was performed under the contract to document compliance with the David-Bacon Act. Criteria Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School was unable to document the contractors were compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.
FINDING 2023-001 DOCUMENT RETENTION SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Title I, Part A Assistance Listing Number: 84.010 Condition The Indiana Department of Education uses data on the poverty levels of students in determining funding amounts for the program. We selected a sample of forty students from the Real Time Data report used in making funding assessments for the year under audit. The School was unable to provide documentation to support the poverty levels of ten of those students. Criteria Per 7 CFR 200.334, “Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non- Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient.” Cause The School did not maintain poverty level documentation for all students reported. Effect We were unable to determine if the poverty levels of all students were properly reported. Funding amounts could have been incorrectly determined. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls requiring the maintenance of student poverty level documentation. Views of Responsible Officials The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.
FINDING 2023-001 DOCUMENT RETENTION SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Title I, Part A Assistance Listing Number: 84.010 Condition The Indiana Department of Education uses data on the poverty levels of students in determining funding amounts for the program. We selected a sample of forty students from the Real Time Data report used in making funding assessments for the year under audit. The School was unable to provide documentation to support the poverty levels of ten of those students. Criteria Per 7 CFR 200.334, “Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other non- Federal entity records pertinent to a Federal award must be retained for a period of three years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report or, for Federal awards that are renewed quarterly or annually, from the date of the submission of the quarterly or annual financial report, respectively, as reported to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity in the case of a subrecipient.” Cause The School did not maintain poverty level documentation for all students reported. Effect We were unable to determine if the poverty levels of all students were properly reported. Funding amounts could have been incorrectly determined. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls requiring the maintenance of student poverty level documentation. Views of Responsible Officials The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.
FINDING 2023-002 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into agreements with contractors for various construction projects paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. The School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week in which work was performed under the contract to document compliance with the David-Bacon Act. Criteria Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School was unable to document the contractors were compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.
FINDING 2023-002 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into agreements with contractors for various construction projects paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. The School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week in which work was performed under the contract to document compliance with the David-Bacon Act. Criteria Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School was unable to document the contractors were compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.
FINDING 2023-002 DAVIS-BACON COMPLIANCE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Federal Program: Education Stabilization Fund Assistance Listing Numbers: 84.425D, 84.425U, and 84.425W Condition The School entered into agreements with contractors for various construction projects paid with funds from the Education Stabilization Fund. The School did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor for each week in which work was performed under the contract to document compliance with the David-Bacon Act. Criteria Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements (which still may be referenced as the Davis-Bacon Act) a provision that the contractor or subcontractor comply with those requirements and the DOL regulations (29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contacts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction). This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls) (29 CFR sections 5.5 and 5.6; the A-102 Common Rule (section 36(i)(5)); OMB Circular A-110 (2 CFR Part 215, Appendix A, Contract Provisions); 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart C; and 2 CFR section 200.326). Cause The School was not aware of the requirement outlined in the Criteria section above. Effect The School was unable to document the contractors were compliant with the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation We recommend the School develop internal controls to ensure that certified payrolls are obtained for each week that work is performed under qualifying construction or sub-construction contracts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The School’s Corrective Action Plan is included on page 24.