Audit 290203

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$3.03M
Findings
12
Programs
2
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-02-13

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
367033 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
367034 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
367035 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
367036 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
367037 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
367038 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
943475 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
943476 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
943477 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
943478 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
943479 2023-001 Material Weakness - N
943480 2023-001 Material Weakness - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
Z5EGG2NBGMB7 Valerie Butt Auditee
7576180476 Jeff Fox Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1- Basis of presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on this Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Organization did not expend any federal or state awards during fiscal year 2023 in the form of noncash assistance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal and state grant activity of the Organization for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”) as codified by DHHS at 45 CFR Part 75 and the state of Tennessee. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, operations and changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Note 4-Payments to subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on this Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Organization did not expend any federal or state awards during fiscal year 2023 in the form of noncash assistance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. The Organization did not pass-through any federal awards to subrecipients.

Finding Details

Finding 2023-001 – Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance in Internal Control over Retention of Supporting Documentation Relating to Sliding Fee Test. Condition: During the audit, 40 sliding fee payments were selected for testing; however, the sliding scale was applied incorrectly for 7 sample items based on reported patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Criteria: The Organization is responsible for charging a sliding fee based on household income and number of residents that reside within the patient’s household. Cause: The Organization did not have fully operating controls in place to ensure the sliding scale was applied correctly for patients who received services. Effect: Eight patients were charged incorrectly based on patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Recommendation: We recommend controls and procedures be implemented to ensure the sliding scale application and assessed rate is reviewed by a secondary reviewer prior to billing. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to ensure appropriate documentation regarding household income and number of residents who reside within the individual’s household is obtained and retained prior to any services being provided to a patient.
Finding 2023-001 – Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance in Internal Control over Retention of Supporting Documentation Relating to Sliding Fee Test. Condition: During the audit, 40 sliding fee payments were selected for testing; however, the sliding scale was applied incorrectly for 7 sample items based on reported patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Criteria: The Organization is responsible for charging a sliding fee based on household income and number of residents that reside within the patient’s household. Cause: The Organization did not have fully operating controls in place to ensure the sliding scale was applied correctly for patients who received services. Effect: Eight patients were charged incorrectly based on patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Recommendation: We recommend controls and procedures be implemented to ensure the sliding scale application and assessed rate is reviewed by a secondary reviewer prior to billing. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to ensure appropriate documentation regarding household income and number of residents who reside within the individual’s household is obtained and retained prior to any services being provided to a patient.
Finding 2023-001 – Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance in Internal Control over Retention of Supporting Documentation Relating to Sliding Fee Test. Condition: During the audit, 40 sliding fee payments were selected for testing; however, the sliding scale was applied incorrectly for 7 sample items based on reported patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Criteria: The Organization is responsible for charging a sliding fee based on household income and number of residents that reside within the patient’s household. Cause: The Organization did not have fully operating controls in place to ensure the sliding scale was applied correctly for patients who received services. Effect: Eight patients were charged incorrectly based on patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Recommendation: We recommend controls and procedures be implemented to ensure the sliding scale application and assessed rate is reviewed by a secondary reviewer prior to billing. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to ensure appropriate documentation regarding household income and number of residents who reside within the individual’s household is obtained and retained prior to any services being provided to a patient.
Finding 2023-001 – Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance in Internal Control over Retention of Supporting Documentation Relating to Sliding Fee Test. Condition: During the audit, 40 sliding fee payments were selected for testing; however, the sliding scale was applied incorrectly for 7 sample items based on reported patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Criteria: The Organization is responsible for charging a sliding fee based on household income and number of residents that reside within the patient’s household. Cause: The Organization did not have fully operating controls in place to ensure the sliding scale was applied correctly for patients who received services. Effect: Eight patients were charged incorrectly based on patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Recommendation: We recommend controls and procedures be implemented to ensure the sliding scale application and assessed rate is reviewed by a secondary reviewer prior to billing. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to ensure appropriate documentation regarding household income and number of residents who reside within the individual’s household is obtained and retained prior to any services being provided to a patient.
Finding 2023-001 – Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance in Internal Control over Retention of Supporting Documentation Relating to Sliding Fee Test. Condition: During the audit, 40 sliding fee payments were selected for testing; however, the sliding scale was applied incorrectly for 7 sample items based on reported patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Criteria: The Organization is responsible for charging a sliding fee based on household income and number of residents that reside within the patient’s household. Cause: The Organization did not have fully operating controls in place to ensure the sliding scale was applied correctly for patients who received services. Effect: Eight patients were charged incorrectly based on patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Recommendation: We recommend controls and procedures be implemented to ensure the sliding scale application and assessed rate is reviewed by a secondary reviewer prior to billing. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to ensure appropriate documentation regarding household income and number of residents who reside within the individual’s household is obtained and retained prior to any services being provided to a patient.
Finding 2023-001 – Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance in Internal Control over Retention of Supporting Documentation Relating to Sliding Fee Test. Condition: During the audit, 40 sliding fee payments were selected for testing; however, the sliding scale was applied incorrectly for 7 sample items based on reported patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Criteria: The Organization is responsible for charging a sliding fee based on household income and number of residents that reside within the patient’s household. Cause: The Organization did not have fully operating controls in place to ensure the sliding scale was applied correctly for patients who received services. Effect: Eight patients were charged incorrectly based on patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Recommendation: We recommend controls and procedures be implemented to ensure the sliding scale application and assessed rate is reviewed by a secondary reviewer prior to billing. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to ensure appropriate documentation regarding household income and number of residents who reside within the individual’s household is obtained and retained prior to any services being provided to a patient.
Finding 2023-001 – Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance in Internal Control over Retention of Supporting Documentation Relating to Sliding Fee Test. Condition: During the audit, 40 sliding fee payments were selected for testing; however, the sliding scale was applied incorrectly for 7 sample items based on reported patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Criteria: The Organization is responsible for charging a sliding fee based on household income and number of residents that reside within the patient’s household. Cause: The Organization did not have fully operating controls in place to ensure the sliding scale was applied correctly for patients who received services. Effect: Eight patients were charged incorrectly based on patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Recommendation: We recommend controls and procedures be implemented to ensure the sliding scale application and assessed rate is reviewed by a secondary reviewer prior to billing. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to ensure appropriate documentation regarding household income and number of residents who reside within the individual’s household is obtained and retained prior to any services being provided to a patient.
Finding 2023-001 – Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance in Internal Control over Retention of Supporting Documentation Relating to Sliding Fee Test. Condition: During the audit, 40 sliding fee payments were selected for testing; however, the sliding scale was applied incorrectly for 7 sample items based on reported patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Criteria: The Organization is responsible for charging a sliding fee based on household income and number of residents that reside within the patient’s household. Cause: The Organization did not have fully operating controls in place to ensure the sliding scale was applied correctly for patients who received services. Effect: Eight patients were charged incorrectly based on patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Recommendation: We recommend controls and procedures be implemented to ensure the sliding scale application and assessed rate is reviewed by a secondary reviewer prior to billing. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to ensure appropriate documentation regarding household income and number of residents who reside within the individual’s household is obtained and retained prior to any services being provided to a patient.
Finding 2023-001 – Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance in Internal Control over Retention of Supporting Documentation Relating to Sliding Fee Test. Condition: During the audit, 40 sliding fee payments were selected for testing; however, the sliding scale was applied incorrectly for 7 sample items based on reported patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Criteria: The Organization is responsible for charging a sliding fee based on household income and number of residents that reside within the patient’s household. Cause: The Organization did not have fully operating controls in place to ensure the sliding scale was applied correctly for patients who received services. Effect: Eight patients were charged incorrectly based on patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Recommendation: We recommend controls and procedures be implemented to ensure the sliding scale application and assessed rate is reviewed by a secondary reviewer prior to billing. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to ensure appropriate documentation regarding household income and number of residents who reside within the individual’s household is obtained and retained prior to any services being provided to a patient.
Finding 2023-001 – Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance in Internal Control over Retention of Supporting Documentation Relating to Sliding Fee Test. Condition: During the audit, 40 sliding fee payments were selected for testing; however, the sliding scale was applied incorrectly for 7 sample items based on reported patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Criteria: The Organization is responsible for charging a sliding fee based on household income and number of residents that reside within the patient’s household. Cause: The Organization did not have fully operating controls in place to ensure the sliding scale was applied correctly for patients who received services. Effect: Eight patients were charged incorrectly based on patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Recommendation: We recommend controls and procedures be implemented to ensure the sliding scale application and assessed rate is reviewed by a secondary reviewer prior to billing. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to ensure appropriate documentation regarding household income and number of residents who reside within the individual’s household is obtained and retained prior to any services being provided to a patient.
Finding 2023-001 – Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance in Internal Control over Retention of Supporting Documentation Relating to Sliding Fee Test. Condition: During the audit, 40 sliding fee payments were selected for testing; however, the sliding scale was applied incorrectly for 7 sample items based on reported patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Criteria: The Organization is responsible for charging a sliding fee based on household income and number of residents that reside within the patient’s household. Cause: The Organization did not have fully operating controls in place to ensure the sliding scale was applied correctly for patients who received services. Effect: Eight patients were charged incorrectly based on patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Recommendation: We recommend controls and procedures be implemented to ensure the sliding scale application and assessed rate is reviewed by a secondary reviewer prior to billing. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to ensure appropriate documentation regarding household income and number of residents who reside within the individual’s household is obtained and retained prior to any services being provided to a patient.
Finding 2023-001 – Material Weakness and Nonmaterial Noncompliance in Internal Control over Retention of Supporting Documentation Relating to Sliding Fee Test. Condition: During the audit, 40 sliding fee payments were selected for testing; however, the sliding scale was applied incorrectly for 7 sample items based on reported patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Criteria: The Organization is responsible for charging a sliding fee based on household income and number of residents that reside within the patient’s household. Cause: The Organization did not have fully operating controls in place to ensure the sliding scale was applied correctly for patients who received services. Effect: Eight patients were charged incorrectly based on patient household income and number of residents who resided within the household. Recommendation: We recommend controls and procedures be implemented to ensure the sliding scale application and assessed rate is reviewed by a secondary reviewer prior to billing. Management’s Response: Management agrees with the finding and is in the process of developing and implementing a comprehensive plan to ensure appropriate documentation regarding household income and number of residents who reside within the individual’s household is obtained and retained prior to any services being provided to a patient.