Audit 28140

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$2.03M
Findings
32
Programs
11
Organization: Midland Area Agency on Aging (IL)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-04-24
Auditor: Sikich LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
31381 2022-001 - - M
31382 2022-001 - - M
31383 2022-001 - - M
31384 2022-001 - - M
31385 2022-001 - - M
31386 2022-001 - - M
31387 2022-001 - - M
31388 2022-001 - - M
31389 2022-001 - - M
31390 2022-001 - - M
31391 2022-001 - - M
31392 2022-001 - - M
31393 2022-001 - - M
31394 2022-001 - - M
31395 2022-001 - - M
31396 2022-001 - - M
607823 2022-001 - - M
607824 2022-001 - - M
607825 2022-001 - - M
607826 2022-001 - - M
607827 2022-001 - - M
607828 2022-001 - - M
607829 2022-001 - - M
607830 2022-001 - - M
607831 2022-001 - - M
607832 2022-001 - - M
607833 2022-001 - - M
607834 2022-001 - - M
607835 2022-001 - - M
607836 2022-001 - - M
607837 2022-001 - - M
607838 2022-001 - - M

Contacts

Name Title Type
MYHGJMNC75X9 Heather Fontanez Auditee
6185321853 Lauren Groff Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Description of Major Federal Programs Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards presents the activity of all federal award programs of Midland Area Agency on Aging, PSA No. 9. The Area Agency's nature of activities is defined in Note 1 to the Area Agency's financial statements. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with requirements of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented using the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 1 to the Area Agency's financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. Special Program for the Aging Title Ill, Part B Grants for Supportive Services and Senior CentersThe objective of the program is to encourage State Agencies on Aging and Area Agencies on Aging to concentrate resources to develop and implement comprehensive and coordinated community -based systems of services for older individuals via statewide planning and area planning and provision of supportive services, including multipurpose senior centers. The objective of these services and centers is to maximize the informal support provided to older Americans to enable them to remain in their homes and communities. Providing transportation services, in-home services and caregiver support services, this program ensures that elders receive the services they need to remain independent.Special Programs for the Aging Title Ill, Part C Nutrition ServicesThe objective of this program is to provide grants to States to support nutrition services including nutritious meals, nutrition education and other appropriate nutrition services for older Americans in order to maintain health, independence and quality of life. Meals may be served in a congregate setting or delivered to the home.Nutrition Services Incentive Program The objective of this program is to reward effective performance by States in the efficient delivery of nutritious meals to older adults through the use of cash or commodities.
Title: Loan Guarantees Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards presents the activity of all federal award programs of Midland Area Agency on Aging, PSA No. 9. The Area Agency's nature of activities is defined in Note 1 to the Area Agency's financial statements. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with requirements of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented using the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 1 to the Area Agency's financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. During fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, there were no federal awards expensed in the form of non-cash assistance and there were no loan guarantees outstanding at year end.

Finding Details

Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.
Criteria: As part of the annual monitoring of subrecipients, a review of the subrecipients auditor?s report should be conducted. Condition: In testing one of four subrecipient monitoring files completed by the Area Agency, it was noted the Area Agency did not obtain and review the audited financial statements of the sub-recipient. We consider this to be a finding of noncompliance with the monitoring requirement. Questioned Costs: $0. Cause and Effect: Area Agency relied on the subrecipient to provide the report once completed and due to turnover at the subrecipient, the report was not sent. Recommendation: We recommend the Area Agency create a process to ensure all reports are obtained and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with this finding and response is included in the Corrective Action Plan.