Audit 27978

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$1.21M
Findings
4
Programs
4
Organization: City of Whitewood (SD)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-07-10

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
32561 2022-001 Material Weakness - L
32562 2022-004 Significant Deficiency - B
609003 2022-001 Material Weakness - L
609004 2022-004 Significant Deficiency - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
FV9FJJ13JLN7 Cory Heckenlaible Auditee
6052692247 Traci Hanson Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Loan/loan guarantee outstanding balances Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the City under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the City. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. COMMUNITY FACILITIES LOANS AND GRANTS (10.766) - Balances outstanding at the end of the audit period were 458645.

Finding Details

Finding No. 2022-001: Financial Statement and Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Preparation Federal Program Affected: Community Development Block Grant (ALN #14.228) Compliance Requirement: Reporting Questioned Costs: None Condition and Cause: We were requested to draft the audited financial statements and related footnote disclosures as part of our regular audit services. Ultimately, it is management?s responsibility to provide for the preparation of the City?s statements and footnotes, and the responsibility of the auditor to determine the fairness of presentation of those statements. From a practical standpoint, we do both for the City at the same time in connection with our audit. This is not unusual for us to do this with cities of your size. Criteria and Effect: It is our responsibility to inform the Council that this deficiency could result in a material misstatement to the financial statements that could have been prevented or detected by the City?s management. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year Finding No. 2021-001. Recommendation: As in prior years, we have instructed management to review a draft of the auditor prepared financials in detail for their accuracy, we have answered any questions they might have, and we have encouraged research of any accounting guidance in connection with the adequacy and appropriateness of classification and disclosure in your statements. We are satisfied the appropriate steps have been taken to provide the City with the completed financial statements. It is the responsibility of management and the City Council to make the decision whether to accept the degree of risk associated with this condition because of cost or other considerations. Response/Corrective Action Plan: See City?s Corrective Action Plan.
Finding No. 2022-004: Written Uniform Guidance Policies Federal Program Affected: Community Development Block Grant (ALN #14.228) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: None Condition and Cause: The City does not have written policies for allowable costs/cost principles. Criteria and Effect: Uniform Guidance specifically requires entities to maintain written policies for allowable costs/cost principles. Not properly maintaining such policies leads to noncompliance and potential unallowable costs. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The City should create written policies for allowable costs/cost principles. Response/Corrective Action Plan: The City is in agreement with the finding. See City?s Corrective Action Plan.
Finding No. 2022-001: Financial Statement and Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Preparation Federal Program Affected: Community Development Block Grant (ALN #14.228) Compliance Requirement: Reporting Questioned Costs: None Condition and Cause: We were requested to draft the audited financial statements and related footnote disclosures as part of our regular audit services. Ultimately, it is management?s responsibility to provide for the preparation of the City?s statements and footnotes, and the responsibility of the auditor to determine the fairness of presentation of those statements. From a practical standpoint, we do both for the City at the same time in connection with our audit. This is not unusual for us to do this with cities of your size. Criteria and Effect: It is our responsibility to inform the Council that this deficiency could result in a material misstatement to the financial statements that could have been prevented or detected by the City?s management. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes, prior year Finding No. 2021-001. Recommendation: As in prior years, we have instructed management to review a draft of the auditor prepared financials in detail for their accuracy, we have answered any questions they might have, and we have encouraged research of any accounting guidance in connection with the adequacy and appropriateness of classification and disclosure in your statements. We are satisfied the appropriate steps have been taken to provide the City with the completed financial statements. It is the responsibility of management and the City Council to make the decision whether to accept the degree of risk associated with this condition because of cost or other considerations. Response/Corrective Action Plan: See City?s Corrective Action Plan.
Finding No. 2022-004: Written Uniform Guidance Policies Federal Program Affected: Community Development Block Grant (ALN #14.228) Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Questioned Costs: None Condition and Cause: The City does not have written policies for allowable costs/cost principles. Criteria and Effect: Uniform Guidance specifically requires entities to maintain written policies for allowable costs/cost principles. Not properly maintaining such policies leads to noncompliance and potential unallowable costs. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No. Recommendation: The City should create written policies for allowable costs/cost principles. Response/Corrective Action Plan: The City is in agreement with the finding. See City?s Corrective Action Plan.