Audit 26659

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$161.54M
Findings
4
Programs
11
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
G4ALRBCZ52G7 Denis Donegan Auditee
6466054217 Meaghan Schachtel Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan Rural Distribution Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of St. Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital Center and Affiliates (SLR) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information on the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance). In accordance with applicable requirements, certain programs may be presented in a fiscal period based on the program-specific guidance (see Notes 3, 4 and 5). Therefore, some amounts presented in the Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the consolidated financial statements of SLR. For purposes of the Schedule, federal awards include any assistance provided by a federal agency either directly or indirectly in the form of grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, direct appropriations, loan and loan guarantees, or other non-cash assistance. Direct and indirect costs are charged to awards in accordance with cost principles contained in the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Cost Principles for Hospitals at 45 CFR Part 75 Appendix IX for awards subject to the Uniform Guidance. Under these cost principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Uniform Guidance provides for a 10% de minimis indirect cost rate election; however, SLR did not make this election and uses a negotiated indirect cost rate. In accordance with HHS requirements specific to Federal Assistance Listing No. 93.498, COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution, the amount presented on the accompanying Schedule for the year ended December 31, 2022 for Federal Assistance Listing No. 93.498 relates to Provider Relief Fund (PRF) payments received from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 used for PRF-eligible activity from the period January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022. SLR did not receive PRF payments during Reporting Period 3. The amounts presented on the accompanying Schedule for the year ended December 31, 2022 reconciles to the PRF information previously reported to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) for PRF Reporting Period 4 (see Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for table). The lost revenues incurred by SLR during the period of availability for PRF Reporting Period 4 (January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022) are in excess of the distributions received from July 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, therefore, the amounts presented in the table above and on the accompanying Schedule are limited to the amount of such distributions.
Title: Food and Nutrition Awards Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of St. Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital Center and Affiliates (SLR) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information on the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance). In accordance with applicable requirements, certain programs may be presented in a fiscal period based on the program-specific guidance (see Notes 3, 4 and 5). Therefore, some amounts presented in the Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the consolidated financial statements of SLR. For purposes of the Schedule, federal awards include any assistance provided by a federal agency either directly or indirectly in the form of grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, direct appropriations, loan and loan guarantees, or other non-cash assistance. Direct and indirect costs are charged to awards in accordance with cost principles contained in the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Cost Principles for Hospitals at 45 CFR Part 75 Appendix IX for awards subject to the Uniform Guidance. Under these cost principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Uniform Guidance provides for a 10% de minimis indirect cost rate election; however, SLR did not make this election and uses a negotiated indirect cost rate. During the year ended December 31, 2022, SLR participated in the New York State Department of Health, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) through the receipt and distribution of food instruments. The United States Department of Agriculture has determined that such WIC food instruments are considered property in lieu of money and, therefore, should be considered part of the subgrant received by SLR. The total amount reported as federal awards on the Schedule represents the value of food instruments redeemed in the amount of $931,441, plus administrative costs of $587,022 for the year ended December 31, 2022. As New York State funds are commingled with federal funds, percentages were applied to determine the total amount of federal funds to be reported above. The federal percentages supplied by the New York State Department of Health were 83.8% for Administrative costs and 100% for Food instruments.
Title: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Mortgage Insurance: Hospit Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of St. Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital Center and Affiliates (SLR) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information on the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance). In accordance with applicable requirements, certain programs may be presented in a fiscal period based on the program-specific guidance (see Notes 3, 4 and 5). Therefore, some amounts presented in the Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the consolidated financial statements of SLR. For purposes of the Schedule, federal awards include any assistance provided by a federal agency either directly or indirectly in the form of grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, direct appropriations, loan and loan guarantees, or other non-cash assistance. Direct and indirect costs are charged to awards in accordance with cost principles contained in the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Cost Principles for Hospitals at 45 CFR Part 75 Appendix IX for awards subject to the Uniform Guidance. Under these cost principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Uniform Guidance provides for a 10% de minimis indirect cost rate election; however, SLR did not make this election and uses a negotiated indirect cost rate. SLR has a mortgage insured under the provisions of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Housing Administration Section 223 Mortgage Insurance Program, pursuant to Section 242 of the National Housing Act. At January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022, the outstanding balance of the loan totaled approximately $151,137,321 and $135,455,856, respectively. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has determined that the mortgage insurance program is to be considered a federal award for purposes of compliance with the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Disaster Grants Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disaster) Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of St. Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital Center and Affiliates (SLR) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information on the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance). In accordance with applicable requirements, certain programs may be presented in a fiscal period based on the program-specific guidance (see Notes 3, 4 and 5). Therefore, some amounts presented in the Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the consolidated financial statements of SLR. For purposes of the Schedule, federal awards include any assistance provided by a federal agency either directly or indirectly in the form of grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, direct appropriations, loan and loan guarantees, or other non-cash assistance. Direct and indirect costs are charged to awards in accordance with cost principles contained in the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Cost Principles for Hospitals at 45 CFR Part 75 Appendix IX for awards subject to the Uniform Guidance. Under these cost principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Uniform Guidance provides for a 10% de minimis indirect cost rate election; however, SLR did not make this election and uses a negotiated indirect cost rate. SLR incurred certain expenditures related to the COVID-19 pandemic which are eligible for reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Disaster Grants Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) (Federal Assistance Listing No. 97.036). In 2022, SLR recognized approximately $1.6 million of obligated reimbursement payments from FEMA. Certain costs were incurred during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 and approved by FEMA in 2022. These amounts have been included in the accompanying Schedule for the year ended December 31, 2022, in accordance with the guidance specific to Federal Assistance Listing No. 97.036. Other FEMA project worksheets have been submitted by SLR but were not approved in 2022. SLR will continue to finalize the project worksheets previously submitted to FEMA and intends to submit additional applications for funding for costs incurred; however, the ultimate amount that SLR may be reimbursed is uncertain.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-001 Eligibility Identification of the Federal Program: Grantor: Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Public Health Solutions (MHRA) Program Name: HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Assistance Listing No.: 93.914 Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.303 states, ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? The Addendum 1, Client Eligibility Addendum of the award grant agreement states the following: ?Subrecipients must obtain evidence of household income for all new and continuing clients to establish eligibility for this program during pre-enrollment, enrollment or re-assessment activities. Clients who do not meet the income requirements are not eligible for this program and should be referred to another program within the organization that is not funded by RW Part A. ?Clients must be re-assessed for income eligibility at least every six months, at the time of the scheduled re-assessment. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is a change in household income and the household income exceeds the eligibility threshold, program staff must obtain documentation of the new household income before services are discontinued. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is no change in household income, or there is a change but it does not exceed the eligibility threshold, the client must sign an attestation stating there is no change in eligibility. This attestation is filed in the client record. Subrecipients must conduct an annual reassessment of income eligibility, using the updated Federal Poverty Guidelines, and must obtain and file documentation of income for each client in order for the client to remain enrolled. ?Clients must confirm residency at least every six months, at the time of the scheduled re-assessment. If at the time of re-assessment there is a change in residency, the provider must obtain documentation of the new address. If at the time of re-assessment there is no change in residency the client must sign an attestation stating there is no change. This attestation is filed in the client record. Subrecipient must request and obtain current documentation of residency annually. The Addendum 1, Client Eligibility Addendum of the award grant agreement states the following, effective March 1, 2022: ?Subrecipients must obtain evidence of household income for all new enrolled clients to comply with income criteria eligibility for this program. Clients who do not meet the income criteria requirements are not eligible for this program and should be referred to another program within the organization that is not funded by Ryan White Part A. ?Subrecipients must conduct an annual reassessment of income eligibility using the updated Federal Poverty Guidelines. Clients must be re-assessed for income eligibility at least once per program year after initial verification occurs (within 90 days of program enrollment). This may include during any Reassessment. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is a change in household income and the household income exceeds the eligibility threshold, program staff must obtain documentation of the new household income before services are discontinued. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is no change in household income, or there is a change, but it does not exceed the eligibility income threshold, the subrecipient can obtain a signed client-attestation and document in the client record. ?Clients must be re-assessed for residency criteria eligibility at least once per program year after initial verification occurs (within 90 days of program enrollment). This may include during any Reassessment. If at the time of re-assessment there is a change in residency, the subrecipient must obtain documentation of the new address and update the Common Demographics form in eSHARE. Condition: During our testing of the internal controls over the eligibility compliance requirement, we observed management did not have effective internal controls in place to retain supporting documentation to support management?s reassessment of a participant?s continued eligibility to receive program services. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place over the compliance requirements as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above. Effect or Potential Effect: Participants receiving services from this grant could potentially be ineligible to receive program services. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs for Assistance Listing No. 93.914 are indeterminable, as program expenditures are not made on a per participant basis. Context: During our testing of internal controls over eligibility as it relates to intake eligibility determination, we selected a sample of 19 out of a total population of 182. We observed that management did not retain the required supporting documentation for 1 participant to support management?s verification of income criteria necessary to support the participant?s eligibility to receive program services. During our testing of internal controls over eligibility as it relates to the reassessment of eligibility, we selected a sample of 40 out of a total population of 339. We observed that management did not retain the required supporting documentation for 15 participants to support management?s reassessment of the participants? continued eligibility to receive program services. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement effective internal controls to retain supporting documentation to support income verification and to perform the reassessment of participants and properly have supporting documentation for each participant in the program to support their eligibility to receive program services. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges this finding and will address remediation in the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-001 Eligibility Identification of the Federal Program: Grantor: Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Public Health Solutions (MHRA) Program Name: HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Assistance Listing No.: 93.914 Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.303 states, ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? The Addendum 1, Client Eligibility Addendum of the award grant agreement states the following: ?Subrecipients must obtain evidence of household income for all new and continuing clients to establish eligibility for this program during pre-enrollment, enrollment or re-assessment activities. Clients who do not meet the income requirements are not eligible for this program and should be referred to another program within the organization that is not funded by RW Part A. ?Clients must be re-assessed for income eligibility at least every six months, at the time of the scheduled re-assessment. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is a change in household income and the household income exceeds the eligibility threshold, program staff must obtain documentation of the new household income before services are discontinued. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is no change in household income, or there is a change but it does not exceed the eligibility threshold, the client must sign an attestation stating there is no change in eligibility. This attestation is filed in the client record. Subrecipients must conduct an annual reassessment of income eligibility, using the updated Federal Poverty Guidelines, and must obtain and file documentation of income for each client in order for the client to remain enrolled. ?Clients must confirm residency at least every six months, at the time of the scheduled re-assessment. If at the time of re-assessment there is a change in residency, the provider must obtain documentation of the new address. If at the time of re-assessment there is no change in residency the client must sign an attestation stating there is no change. This attestation is filed in the client record. Subrecipient must request and obtain current documentation of residency annually. The Addendum 1, Client Eligibility Addendum of the award grant agreement states the following, effective March 1, 2022: ?Subrecipients must obtain evidence of household income for all new enrolled clients to comply with income criteria eligibility for this program. Clients who do not meet the income criteria requirements are not eligible for this program and should be referred to another program within the organization that is not funded by Ryan White Part A. ?Subrecipients must conduct an annual reassessment of income eligibility using the updated Federal Poverty Guidelines. Clients must be re-assessed for income eligibility at least once per program year after initial verification occurs (within 90 days of program enrollment). This may include during any Reassessment. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is a change in household income and the household income exceeds the eligibility threshold, program staff must obtain documentation of the new household income before services are discontinued. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is no change in household income, or there is a change, but it does not exceed the eligibility income threshold, the subrecipient can obtain a signed client-attestation and document in the client record. ?Clients must be re-assessed for residency criteria eligibility at least once per program year after initial verification occurs (within 90 days of program enrollment). This may include during any Reassessment. If at the time of re-assessment there is a change in residency, the subrecipient must obtain documentation of the new address and update the Common Demographics form in eSHARE. Condition: During our testing of the internal controls over the eligibility compliance requirement, we observed management did not have effective internal controls in place to retain supporting documentation to support management?s reassessment of a participant?s continued eligibility to receive program services. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place over the compliance requirements as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above. Effect or Potential Effect: Participants receiving services from this grant could potentially be ineligible to receive program services. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs for Assistance Listing No. 93.914 are indeterminable, as program expenditures are not made on a per participant basis. Context: During our testing of internal controls over eligibility as it relates to intake eligibility determination, we selected a sample of 19 out of a total population of 182. We observed that management did not retain the required supporting documentation for 1 participant to support management?s verification of income criteria necessary to support the participant?s eligibility to receive program services. During our testing of internal controls over eligibility as it relates to the reassessment of eligibility, we selected a sample of 40 out of a total population of 339. We observed that management did not retain the required supporting documentation for 15 participants to support management?s reassessment of the participants? continued eligibility to receive program services. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement effective internal controls to retain supporting documentation to support income verification and to perform the reassessment of participants and properly have supporting documentation for each participant in the program to support their eligibility to receive program services. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges this finding and will address remediation in the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-001 Eligibility Identification of the Federal Program: Grantor: Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Public Health Solutions (MHRA) Program Name: HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Assistance Listing No.: 93.914 Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.303 states, ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? The Addendum 1, Client Eligibility Addendum of the award grant agreement states the following: ?Subrecipients must obtain evidence of household income for all new and continuing clients to establish eligibility for this program during pre-enrollment, enrollment or re-assessment activities. Clients who do not meet the income requirements are not eligible for this program and should be referred to another program within the organization that is not funded by RW Part A. ?Clients must be re-assessed for income eligibility at least every six months, at the time of the scheduled re-assessment. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is a change in household income and the household income exceeds the eligibility threshold, program staff must obtain documentation of the new household income before services are discontinued. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is no change in household income, or there is a change but it does not exceed the eligibility threshold, the client must sign an attestation stating there is no change in eligibility. This attestation is filed in the client record. Subrecipients must conduct an annual reassessment of income eligibility, using the updated Federal Poverty Guidelines, and must obtain and file documentation of income for each client in order for the client to remain enrolled. ?Clients must confirm residency at least every six months, at the time of the scheduled re-assessment. If at the time of re-assessment there is a change in residency, the provider must obtain documentation of the new address. If at the time of re-assessment there is no change in residency the client must sign an attestation stating there is no change. This attestation is filed in the client record. Subrecipient must request and obtain current documentation of residency annually. The Addendum 1, Client Eligibility Addendum of the award grant agreement states the following, effective March 1, 2022: ?Subrecipients must obtain evidence of household income for all new enrolled clients to comply with income criteria eligibility for this program. Clients who do not meet the income criteria requirements are not eligible for this program and should be referred to another program within the organization that is not funded by Ryan White Part A. ?Subrecipients must conduct an annual reassessment of income eligibility using the updated Federal Poverty Guidelines. Clients must be re-assessed for income eligibility at least once per program year after initial verification occurs (within 90 days of program enrollment). This may include during any Reassessment. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is a change in household income and the household income exceeds the eligibility threshold, program staff must obtain documentation of the new household income before services are discontinued. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is no change in household income, or there is a change, but it does not exceed the eligibility income threshold, the subrecipient can obtain a signed client-attestation and document in the client record. ?Clients must be re-assessed for residency criteria eligibility at least once per program year after initial verification occurs (within 90 days of program enrollment). This may include during any Reassessment. If at the time of re-assessment there is a change in residency, the subrecipient must obtain documentation of the new address and update the Common Demographics form in eSHARE. Condition: During our testing of the internal controls over the eligibility compliance requirement, we observed management did not have effective internal controls in place to retain supporting documentation to support management?s reassessment of a participant?s continued eligibility to receive program services. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place over the compliance requirements as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above. Effect or Potential Effect: Participants receiving services from this grant could potentially be ineligible to receive program services. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs for Assistance Listing No. 93.914 are indeterminable, as program expenditures are not made on a per participant basis. Context: During our testing of internal controls over eligibility as it relates to intake eligibility determination, we selected a sample of 19 out of a total population of 182. We observed that management did not retain the required supporting documentation for 1 participant to support management?s verification of income criteria necessary to support the participant?s eligibility to receive program services. During our testing of internal controls over eligibility as it relates to the reassessment of eligibility, we selected a sample of 40 out of a total population of 339. We observed that management did not retain the required supporting documentation for 15 participants to support management?s reassessment of the participants? continued eligibility to receive program services. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement effective internal controls to retain supporting documentation to support income verification and to perform the reassessment of participants and properly have supporting documentation for each participant in the program to support their eligibility to receive program services. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges this finding and will address remediation in the accompanying corrective action plan.
Finding 2022-001 Eligibility Identification of the Federal Program: Grantor: Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Entity: Public Health Solutions (MHRA) Program Name: HIV Emergency Relief Project Grants Assistance Listing No.: 93.914 Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.303 states, ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? The Addendum 1, Client Eligibility Addendum of the award grant agreement states the following: ?Subrecipients must obtain evidence of household income for all new and continuing clients to establish eligibility for this program during pre-enrollment, enrollment or re-assessment activities. Clients who do not meet the income requirements are not eligible for this program and should be referred to another program within the organization that is not funded by RW Part A. ?Clients must be re-assessed for income eligibility at least every six months, at the time of the scheduled re-assessment. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is a change in household income and the household income exceeds the eligibility threshold, program staff must obtain documentation of the new household income before services are discontinued. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is no change in household income, or there is a change but it does not exceed the eligibility threshold, the client must sign an attestation stating there is no change in eligibility. This attestation is filed in the client record. Subrecipients must conduct an annual reassessment of income eligibility, using the updated Federal Poverty Guidelines, and must obtain and file documentation of income for each client in order for the client to remain enrolled. ?Clients must confirm residency at least every six months, at the time of the scheduled re-assessment. If at the time of re-assessment there is a change in residency, the provider must obtain documentation of the new address. If at the time of re-assessment there is no change in residency the client must sign an attestation stating there is no change. This attestation is filed in the client record. Subrecipient must request and obtain current documentation of residency annually. The Addendum 1, Client Eligibility Addendum of the award grant agreement states the following, effective March 1, 2022: ?Subrecipients must obtain evidence of household income for all new enrolled clients to comply with income criteria eligibility for this program. Clients who do not meet the income criteria requirements are not eligible for this program and should be referred to another program within the organization that is not funded by Ryan White Part A. ?Subrecipients must conduct an annual reassessment of income eligibility using the updated Federal Poverty Guidelines. Clients must be re-assessed for income eligibility at least once per program year after initial verification occurs (within 90 days of program enrollment). This may include during any Reassessment. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is a change in household income and the household income exceeds the eligibility threshold, program staff must obtain documentation of the new household income before services are discontinued. If, at the time of re-assessment, there is no change in household income, or there is a change, but it does not exceed the eligibility income threshold, the subrecipient can obtain a signed client-attestation and document in the client record. ?Clients must be re-assessed for residency criteria eligibility at least once per program year after initial verification occurs (within 90 days of program enrollment). This may include during any Reassessment. If at the time of re-assessment there is a change in residency, the subrecipient must obtain documentation of the new address and update the Common Demographics form in eSHARE. Condition: During our testing of the internal controls over the eligibility compliance requirement, we observed management did not have effective internal controls in place to retain supporting documentation to support management?s reassessment of a participant?s continued eligibility to receive program services. Cause: Management did not have effective internal controls in place over the compliance requirements as stated in the criteria or specific requirement section above. Effect or Potential Effect: Participants receiving services from this grant could potentially be ineligible to receive program services. Questioned Costs: Questioned costs for Assistance Listing No. 93.914 are indeterminable, as program expenditures are not made on a per participant basis. Context: During our testing of internal controls over eligibility as it relates to intake eligibility determination, we selected a sample of 19 out of a total population of 182. We observed that management did not retain the required supporting documentation for 1 participant to support management?s verification of income criteria necessary to support the participant?s eligibility to receive program services. During our testing of internal controls over eligibility as it relates to the reassessment of eligibility, we selected a sample of 40 out of a total population of 339. We observed that management did not retain the required supporting documentation for 15 participants to support management?s reassessment of the participants? continued eligibility to receive program services. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement effective internal controls to retain supporting documentation to support income verification and to perform the reassessment of participants and properly have supporting documentation for each participant in the program to support their eligibility to receive program services. Views of Responsible Officials: Management acknowledges this finding and will address remediation in the accompanying corrective action plan.