Audit 251646

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$54.74M
Findings
2
Programs
5
Organization: Fulton County Health Center (OH)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-06-07

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
213917 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
790359 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L

Contacts

Name Title Type
FRH2FFME3RM7 Ms. Jenee Seibert Auditee
4193302606 Ryan Sells Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Loans balances Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Fulton County Health Center (the Hospital) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Hospital, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Hospital. Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement, except for expenditures related to Assistance Listing Number (ALN) 93.498, Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan Rural Distribution (PRF). PRF does not apply the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, but rather applies the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) guidance and frequently asked questions, as outlined in the Compliance Supplement. For the PRF program, HHS has indicated that the amounts on the Schedule should be reported in correspondence with reporting requirements of the HHS PRF Reporting Portal. Payments from HHS for PRF are assigned to one of five payment received periods based upon the date each PRF payment was received. Each period has a specific period of availability and timing of reporting requirements. The pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. The Hospital has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate to recover indirect costs as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. Loans outstanding at the beginning of the year and loans made during the year are included in the federal expenditures presented in the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. The balances of loans outstanding at December 31, 2022 consist of the following: See footnotes to the SEFA for chart/table

Finding Details

Assitance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 93.498, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, COVID 19: Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution (PRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year N/A, 2022 Pass through Entity N/A Direct funded Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding Yes 2021 002 Criteria Per the Provider Relief Fund General and Targeted Distribution Post Payment Notice of Reporting Requirements dated June 11, 2021, recipients may choose to apply PRF payments toward lost revenue using one of three options, up to the following amounts: Option i: The difference between actual patient care revenue Option ii: The difference between budgeted (prior to March 27, 2020) and actual patient care revenue Option iii: The amount calculated by any reasonable method of estimating revenue. Condition The Hospital?s controls in place for reporting submissions did not identify that the lost revenue amounts reported in the period 3 portal submission did not consistently follow the Hospital's Option iii methodology. Questioned Costs None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed N/A Refer to context below for additional information. Context The reporting submission for lost revenue did not follow the acceptable options provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, because the amounts reported by the Hospital were not consistent with its Option iii methodology. Recipients may choose to apply Provider Relief Fund payments toward lost revenue using one of three options: (i) up to the amount of the difference between actual patient care revenue, (ii) up to the amount of the difference between budgeted (if approved prior to March 27, 2020) and actual patient care revenue, or (iii) up to the amount calculated by any reasonable method of estimating revenue. The Hospital used Option iii to calculate lost revenue, but inconsistently applied its methodology and, as a result, reported an incorrect total of lost revenue in 3 of the quarters included in the period 3 submission, resulting in overstated lost revenue of $330,557. If the Hospital had reported amounts that were consistent with its Option iii methodology, it still would have qualified to recognize all PRF payments received during the period. Cause and Effect Appropriate review of the reporting submission was not completed to ensure the report followed the required guidelines and the Hospital's methodologies. As a result, the report submitted was inaccurate. Recommendation We recommend the Hospital implement controls, including levels of review, to ensure reports are completed and submitted in accordance with the guidelines established by HHS. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Let it be known that if the overstated lost revenue amount from the period 3 submission were to be disallowed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the unused lost revenue after the overstatement is corrected more than offsets the disallowed amount. The issue was corrected in the period 4 submission.
Assitance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name 93.498, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, COVID 19: Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution (PRF) Federal Award Identification Number and Year N/A, 2022 Pass through Entity N/A Direct funded Finding Type Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding Yes 2021 002 Criteria Per the Provider Relief Fund General and Targeted Distribution Post Payment Notice of Reporting Requirements dated June 11, 2021, recipients may choose to apply PRF payments toward lost revenue using one of three options, up to the following amounts: Option i: The difference between actual patient care revenue Option ii: The difference between budgeted (prior to March 27, 2020) and actual patient care revenue Option iii: The amount calculated by any reasonable method of estimating revenue. Condition The Hospital?s controls in place for reporting submissions did not identify that the lost revenue amounts reported in the period 3 portal submission did not consistently follow the Hospital's Option iii methodology. Questioned Costs None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed N/A Refer to context below for additional information. Context The reporting submission for lost revenue did not follow the acceptable options provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, because the amounts reported by the Hospital were not consistent with its Option iii methodology. Recipients may choose to apply Provider Relief Fund payments toward lost revenue using one of three options: (i) up to the amount of the difference between actual patient care revenue, (ii) up to the amount of the difference between budgeted (if approved prior to March 27, 2020) and actual patient care revenue, or (iii) up to the amount calculated by any reasonable method of estimating revenue. The Hospital used Option iii to calculate lost revenue, but inconsistently applied its methodology and, as a result, reported an incorrect total of lost revenue in 3 of the quarters included in the period 3 submission, resulting in overstated lost revenue of $330,557. If the Hospital had reported amounts that were consistent with its Option iii methodology, it still would have qualified to recognize all PRF payments received during the period. Cause and Effect Appropriate review of the reporting submission was not completed to ensure the report followed the required guidelines and the Hospital's methodologies. As a result, the report submitted was inaccurate. Recommendation We recommend the Hospital implement controls, including levels of review, to ensure reports are completed and submitted in accordance with the guidelines established by HHS. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan Let it be known that if the overstated lost revenue amount from the period 3 submission were to be disallowed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the unused lost revenue after the overstatement is corrected more than offsets the disallowed amount. The issue was corrected in the period 4 submission.