Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Services Cluster, ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Wagner Peyser ES -MWSC Operations, AY 20 WIOA Adult Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - An auditee must prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule"), as required by 2 CFR 200.508. The Schedule should be for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended. Condition - The controls in place were not adequate to ensure the Schedule was complete and accurate. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - The original Schedule provided for audit did not reconcile to the general ledger and changed by approximately $480,000 between the original and final version. The most significant changes impacted the WIOA cluster and TANF federal programs. Cause and Effect - An accurate Schedule is a necessary component of major program selection. Without proper processes and controls to determine the completeness and accuracy of the Schedule, DESC risks noncompliance with federal requirements. Recommendation - DESC should perform a thorough review of the Schedule and ensure it reconciles to the underlying general ledger prior to the onset of the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understands their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of the grants in their portfolio, which is the basis for the creation of the Schedule. Additionally, audit procedures are being put in place to ensure that the Schedule is created and reviewed, at minimum, on a semiannual basis.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Services Cluster, ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Wagner Peyser ES -MWSC Operations, AY 20 WIOA Adult Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - An auditee must prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule"), as required by 2 CFR 200.508. The Schedule should be for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended. Condition - The controls in place were not adequate to ensure the Schedule was complete and accurate. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - The original Schedule provided for audit did not reconcile to the general ledger and changed by approximately $480,000 between the original and final version. The most significant changes impacted the WIOA cluster and TANF federal programs. Cause and Effect - An accurate Schedule is a necessary component of major program selection. Without proper processes and controls to determine the completeness and accuracy of the Schedule, DESC risks noncompliance with federal requirements. Recommendation - DESC should perform a thorough review of the Schedule and ensure it reconciles to the underlying general ledger prior to the onset of the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understands their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of the grants in their portfolio, which is the basis for the creation of the Schedule. Additionally, audit procedures are being put in place to ensure that the Schedule is created and reviewed, at minimum, on a semiannual basis.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Services Cluster, ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Wagner Peyser ES -MWSC Operations, AY 20 WIOA Adult Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - An auditee must prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule"), as required by 2 CFR 200.508. The Schedule should be for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended. Condition - The controls in place were not adequate to ensure the Schedule was complete and accurate. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - The original Schedule provided for audit did not reconcile to the general ledger and changed by approximately $480,000 between the original and final version. The most significant changes impacted the WIOA cluster and TANF federal programs. Cause and Effect - An accurate Schedule is a necessary component of major program selection. Without proper processes and controls to determine the completeness and accuracy of the Schedule, DESC risks noncompliance with federal requirements. Recommendation - DESC should perform a thorough review of the Schedule and ensure it reconciles to the underlying general ledger prior to the onset of the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understands their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of the grants in their portfolio, which is the basis for the creation of the Schedule. Additionally, audit procedures are being put in place to ensure that the Schedule is created and reviewed, at minimum, on a semiannual basis.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AY 21 WIOA Local Administration Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.405(d) indicates that costs that benefit two or more projects or activities must be allocated to projects based on the proportional benefit. Condition - During the year, DESC incurred expenditures to hire a consultant to assist with the search for a chief financial officer. The full cost was charged to the WIOA cluster. Since the chief financial officer position benefits the entire organization, it should have been proportionately allocated to all programs. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Executive searches are not a commonly incurred expenditure for DESC. The amount of the expenditure was $10,000. Cause and Effect - An internal control was not in place to ensure that the chief financial officer search was proportionately allocated. When the matter was brought to management's attention during the audit, a correction was made. Recommendation - Controls should be put in place to ensure that costs that benefit multiple activities are appropriately allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understand their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of costs charged to their grants within their portfolios. DESC will implement purchase orders prior to the end of FY 2022/2023, which will include financial analysts providing cost allocations coding in advance of receiving the invoice. Additionally, training has been provided to fiscal staff on cost allocation requirements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Services Cluster, ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Wagner Peyser ES -MWSC Operations, AY 20 WIOA Adult Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - An auditee must prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule"), as required by 2 CFR 200.508. The Schedule should be for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended. Condition - The controls in place were not adequate to ensure the Schedule was complete and accurate. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - The original Schedule provided for audit did not reconcile to the general ledger and changed by approximately $480,000 between the original and final version. The most significant changes impacted the WIOA cluster and TANF federal programs. Cause and Effect - An accurate Schedule is a necessary component of major program selection. Without proper processes and controls to determine the completeness and accuracy of the Schedule, DESC risks noncompliance with federal requirements. Recommendation - DESC should perform a thorough review of the Schedule and ensure it reconciles to the underlying general ledger prior to the onset of the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understands their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of the grants in their portfolio, which is the basis for the creation of the Schedule. Additionally, audit procedures are being put in place to ensure that the Schedule is created and reviewed, at minimum, on a semiannual basis.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AY 21 WIOA Local Administration Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.405(d) indicates that costs that benefit two or more projects or activities must be allocated to projects based on the proportional benefit. Condition - During the year, DESC incurred expenditures to hire a consultant to assist with the search for a chief financial officer. The full cost was charged to the WIOA cluster. Since the chief financial officer position benefits the entire organization, it should have been proportionately allocated to all programs. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Executive searches are not a commonly incurred expenditure for DESC. The amount of the expenditure was $10,000. Cause and Effect - An internal control was not in place to ensure that the chief financial officer search was proportionately allocated. When the matter was brought to management's attention during the audit, a correction was made. Recommendation - Controls should be put in place to ensure that costs that benefit multiple activities are appropriately allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understand their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of costs charged to their grants within their portfolios. DESC will implement purchase orders prior to the end of FY 2022/2023, which will include financial analysts providing cost allocations coding in advance of receiving the invoice. Additionally, training has been provided to fiscal staff on cost allocation requirements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AY 21 WIOA Local Administration Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.405(d) indicates that costs that benefit two or more projects or activities must be allocated to projects based on the proportional benefit. Condition - During the year, DESC incurred expenditures to hire a consultant to assist with the search for a chief financial officer. The full cost was charged to the WIOA cluster. Since the chief financial officer position benefits the entire organization, it should have been proportionately allocated to all programs. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Executive searches are not a commonly incurred expenditure for DESC. The amount of the expenditure was $10,000. Cause and Effect - An internal control was not in place to ensure that the chief financial officer search was proportionately allocated. When the matter was brought to management's attention during the audit, a correction was made. Recommendation - Controls should be put in place to ensure that costs that benefit multiple activities are appropriately allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understand their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of costs charged to their grants within their portfolios. DESC will implement purchase orders prior to the end of FY 2022/2023, which will include financial analysts providing cost allocations coding in advance of receiving the invoice. Additionally, training has been provided to fiscal staff on cost allocation requirements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Services Cluster, ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Wagner Peyser ES -MWSC Operations, AY 20 WIOA Adult Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - An auditee must prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule"), as required by 2 CFR 200.508. The Schedule should be for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended. Condition - The controls in place were not adequate to ensure the Schedule was complete and accurate. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - The original Schedule provided for audit did not reconcile to the general ledger and changed by approximately $480,000 between the original and final version. The most significant changes impacted the WIOA cluster and TANF federal programs. Cause and Effect - An accurate Schedule is a necessary component of major program selection. Without proper processes and controls to determine the completeness and accuracy of the Schedule, DESC risks noncompliance with federal requirements. Recommendation - DESC should perform a thorough review of the Schedule and ensure it reconciles to the underlying general ledger prior to the onset of the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understands their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of the grants in their portfolio, which is the basis for the creation of the Schedule. Additionally, audit procedures are being put in place to ensure that the Schedule is created and reviewed, at minimum, on a semiannual basis.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Services Cluster, ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Wagner Peyser ES -MWSC Operations, AY 20 WIOA Adult Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - An auditee must prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule"), as required by 2 CFR 200.508. The Schedule should be for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended. Condition - The controls in place were not adequate to ensure the Schedule was complete and accurate. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - The original Schedule provided for audit did not reconcile to the general ledger and changed by approximately $480,000 between the original and final version. The most significant changes impacted the WIOA cluster and TANF federal programs. Cause and Effect - An accurate Schedule is a necessary component of major program selection. Without proper processes and controls to determine the completeness and accuracy of the Schedule, DESC risks noncompliance with federal requirements. Recommendation - DESC should perform a thorough review of the Schedule and ensure it reconciles to the underlying general ledger prior to the onset of the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understands their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of the grants in their portfolio, which is the basis for the creation of the Schedule. Additionally, audit procedures are being put in place to ensure that the Schedule is created and reviewed, at minimum, on a semiannual basis.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Services Cluster, ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Wagner Peyser ES -MWSC Operations, AY 20 WIOA Adult Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - An auditee must prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule"), as required by 2 CFR 200.508. The Schedule should be for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended. Condition - The controls in place were not adequate to ensure the Schedule was complete and accurate. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - The original Schedule provided for audit did not reconcile to the general ledger and changed by approximately $480,000 between the original and final version. The most significant changes impacted the WIOA cluster and TANF federal programs. Cause and Effect - An accurate Schedule is a necessary component of major program selection. Without proper processes and controls to determine the completeness and accuracy of the Schedule, DESC risks noncompliance with federal requirements. Recommendation - DESC should perform a thorough review of the Schedule and ensure it reconciles to the underlying general ledger prior to the onset of the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understands their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of the grants in their portfolio, which is the basis for the creation of the Schedule. Additionally, audit procedures are being put in place to ensure that the Schedule is created and reviewed, at minimum, on a semiannual basis.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AY 21 WIOA Local Administration Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.405(d) indicates that costs that benefit two or more projects or activities must be allocated to projects based on the proportional benefit. Condition - During the year, DESC incurred expenditures to hire a consultant to assist with the search for a chief financial officer. The full cost was charged to the WIOA cluster. Since the chief financial officer position benefits the entire organization, it should have been proportionately allocated to all programs. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Executive searches are not a commonly incurred expenditure for DESC. The amount of the expenditure was $10,000. Cause and Effect - An internal control was not in place to ensure that the chief financial officer search was proportionately allocated. When the matter was brought to management's attention during the audit, a correction was made. Recommendation - Controls should be put in place to ensure that costs that benefit multiple activities are appropriately allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understand their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of costs charged to their grants within their portfolios. DESC will implement purchase orders prior to the end of FY 2022/2023, which will include financial analysts providing cost allocations coding in advance of receiving the invoice. Additionally, training has been provided to fiscal staff on cost allocation requirements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Services Cluster, ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Wagner Peyser ES -MWSC Operations, AY 20 WIOA Adult Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - An auditee must prepare appropriate financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule"), as required by 2 CFR 200.508. The Schedule should be for the period covered by the auditee's financial statements, which must include the total federal awards expended. Condition - The controls in place were not adequate to ensure the Schedule was complete and accurate. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - The original Schedule provided for audit did not reconcile to the general ledger and changed by approximately $480,000 between the original and final version. The most significant changes impacted the WIOA cluster and TANF federal programs. Cause and Effect - An accurate Schedule is a necessary component of major program selection. Without proper processes and controls to determine the completeness and accuracy of the Schedule, DESC risks noncompliance with federal requirements. Recommendation - DESC should perform a thorough review of the Schedule and ensure it reconciles to the underlying general ledger prior to the onset of the audit. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understands their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of the grants in their portfolio, which is the basis for the creation of the Schedule. Additionally, audit procedures are being put in place to ensure that the Schedule is created and reviewed, at minimum, on a semiannual basis.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AY 21 WIOA Local Administration Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.405(d) indicates that costs that benefit two or more projects or activities must be allocated to projects based on the proportional benefit. Condition - During the year, DESC incurred expenditures to hire a consultant to assist with the search for a chief financial officer. The full cost was charged to the WIOA cluster. Since the chief financial officer position benefits the entire organization, it should have been proportionately allocated to all programs. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Executive searches are not a commonly incurred expenditure for DESC. The amount of the expenditure was $10,000. Cause and Effect - An internal control was not in place to ensure that the chief financial officer search was proportionately allocated. When the matter was brought to management's attention during the audit, a correction was made. Recommendation - Controls should be put in place to ensure that costs that benefit multiple activities are appropriately allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understand their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of costs charged to their grants within their portfolios. DESC will implement purchase orders prior to the end of FY 2022/2023, which will include financial analysts providing cost allocations coding in advance of receiving the invoice. Additionally, training has been provided to fiscal staff on cost allocation requirements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AY 21 WIOA Local Administration Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.405(d) indicates that costs that benefit two or more projects or activities must be allocated to projects based on the proportional benefit. Condition - During the year, DESC incurred expenditures to hire a consultant to assist with the search for a chief financial officer. The full cost was charged to the WIOA cluster. Since the chief financial officer position benefits the entire organization, it should have been proportionately allocated to all programs. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Executive searches are not a commonly incurred expenditure for DESC. The amount of the expenditure was $10,000. Cause and Effect - An internal control was not in place to ensure that the chief financial officer search was proportionately allocated. When the matter was brought to management's attention during the audit, a correction was made. Recommendation - Controls should be put in place to ensure that costs that benefit multiple activities are appropriately allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC has replaced members and expanded the number of members on the fiscal/accounting team, including an experienced accounting manager and senior accountant, and implemented a training program to ensure all fiscal/accounting team members are aware of and understand their duties and responsibilities as related to the reconciliation of costs charged to their grants within their portfolios. DESC will implement purchase orders prior to the end of FY 2022/2023, which will include financial analysts providing cost allocations coding in advance of receiving the invoice. Additionally, training has been provided to fiscal staff on cost allocation requirements.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 U.S. Department of Labor - WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - AA332361955A26 and AA347752055A26 2020, 2021 and 2022 Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.403(g) indicates that costs must be adequately documented in order to be allowable under federal awards. Condition - DESC transferred $70,590 of expenditures to the WIOA cluster from another grant. There was no support to document the rationale for the transfer or to support allowability. Questioned Costs - $70,590 Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - The questioned cost is made up of the total amount that was transferred. Context - There was only one journal entry transferring expenditures from another grant activity into the WIOA cluster. Cause and Effect - The journal entry was made by a departed staff member, and DESC was unable to locate support for the transfer of expenditures to the WIOA grant. Since there is not adequate documentation to support the transfer, there are questioned costs. In addition, the pass-through agency could disallow the unsupported cost and require a return of funds. Recommendation - DESC should ensure there is adequate support for each cost charged to a federal award. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - DESC has updated fiscal policies and procedures, requiring supporting documentation for all journal entries that has been reviewed with all fiscal staff. Additionally, a review of the supervisor requirements to review the support documentation prior to approval has been completed. Additionally, the Abila MIP financial accounting system has been updated to allow for supporting documentation to be attached to each individual journal entry. Finally, a SharePoint site has been created for all supporting documentation to be stored for access by the appropriate staff members.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - ALN 17.207 Employment Service Cluster and ALN 17.258, 17.259, and 17.278 WIOA Cluster Federal Award Identification Number and Year - Various Pass-through Entity - Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity - Workforce Development Agency Finding Type - Significant deficiency Repeat Finding - No Criteria - 2 CFR 200.430(a)(3) indicates that personal services are allowable to the extent they are determined and supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition - An internal control was not in place to document that the current rates of pay were approved. During our testing of payroll, we determined that actual pay was charged to the federal grants tested. However, there was no documentation (within personnel files or other means) to support that the rates of pay were approved. Questioned Costs - Not applicable Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed - Not applicable Context - Five of the six personnel files that were provided as support for pay rates appeared to contain outdated information. Cause and Effect - DESC did not have a control in place to maintain current payrates in personnel files or to provide alternative documentation to support that pay rates were approved. As a result, we were not able to determine if the rates of pay were approved by management. Recommendation - DESC should maintain up-to-date personnel information to support that the rates of pay for employees are approved. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions - DESC was unable to locate evidence due to turnover with the HR department. We have hired a new director of human resources (the "Director"), who has implemented an employee filing system that incorporates up-to-date employee information and salary information. This information is noted in offer letters, promotion letters, and salary increase letters. All payroll updates are required in writing to evidence approval of the Director and another executive team member's authorization (president or CFO). This confidential information is stored in the Director?s locked office.