Audit 24655

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$2.13M
Findings
2
Programs
1
Organization: Jackson Transit Authority (TN)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-14

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
30489 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - I
606931 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
20.507 Federal Transit_formula Grants $411 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
TS7EBVDTKXQ6 Elizabeth Merriwether Auditee
7314220200 James Bence Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: The accompanying supplemental Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards includes the Federal and State grant activity of JTA under programs of the Federal and State governments for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Because the schedule presents note only a selected portion of the operations of JTA, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of JTA. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. Passthrough entity identifying numbers are presented where available. JTA has elected not to use the 10percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Criteria: When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: The Authority did not have controls in place to document the proper review of one covered transaction for proper suspension and debarment prior to entering into the transaction. Cause: Management did not maintain documentation as required through 2 CFR section 180 to support the transaction was not entered into with a suspended or debarred third party. Effects: Failure to properly maintain documentation of the transaction does not allow for the verification that the test occurred prior to entering into the transaction. If the Authority were to enter into a transaction with an suspended or debarred party, the whole transaction could be disallowed and not be eligible for federal funding. Questioned Costs: Based on testing, the particular entity was noted to not be included in the listing maintained at SAM.gov and therefore, there are no questioned costs. Context: This was the only instance noted in testing and appears to be an isolated instance. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority ensure all covered transactions are properly reviewed for proper suspension and debarment compliance prior to entering into the transaction. There are three optional ways to accomplish this requirement, which are (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Views of Responsible Officials: We will ensure all covered transactions are properly reviewed and documentation maintained in the procurement files, prior to entering into future agreements.
Criteria: When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: The Authority did not have controls in place to document the proper review of one covered transaction for proper suspension and debarment prior to entering into the transaction. Cause: Management did not maintain documentation as required through 2 CFR section 180 to support the transaction was not entered into with a suspended or debarred third party. Effects: Failure to properly maintain documentation of the transaction does not allow for the verification that the test occurred prior to entering into the transaction. If the Authority were to enter into a transaction with an suspended or debarred party, the whole transaction could be disallowed and not be eligible for federal funding. Questioned Costs: Based on testing, the particular entity was noted to not be included in the listing maintained at SAM.gov and therefore, there are no questioned costs. Context: This was the only instance noted in testing and appears to be an isolated instance. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority ensure all covered transactions are properly reviewed for proper suspension and debarment compliance prior to entering into the transaction. There are three optional ways to accomplish this requirement, which are (1) checking the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions maintained by the General Services Administration (GSA) and available at SAM.gov, (2) collecting a certification from the entity, or (3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that entity (2 CFR section 180.300). Views of Responsible Officials: We will ensure all covered transactions are properly reviewed and documentation maintained in the procurement files, prior to entering into future agreements.