Audit 24608

FY End
2022-11-30
Total Expended
$953,712
Findings
2
Programs
2
Organization: Saline County (IL)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-08-30

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
35178 2022-004 - - B
611620 2022-004 - - B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $930,911 Yes 1
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $22,801 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
M217LNJT9PT9 Jeremy Maloney Auditee
6182526915 Sarah Gibbens Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Saline County, IL under programs of the federal government for the year ended November 30, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U>S> Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Saline County, IL, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net assets of Saline County, IL. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

2022-004 Related Party Transaction Documentation Federal Program: CFDA# 27.027 Department of the Treasury Criteria: Related party transactions should be supported by proper documentation. Condition: During disbursement testing, we noted transactions recorded where proper documentation could not be located. During receipt and disbursement testing of the County's funds for federal awards testing, we noted that assessed value documentation of the purchase of a building for document storage from a related party couldn?t not be provided for one transaction sampled. Questioned Costs: $106,469.42. The questioned costs were determined by using a statistical sample. Context: Total federal funds expended during the fiscal year ending November 30, 2022 under this program totaled $953,712. Cause: These instances occur due to misfiling of documentation or management override of the approval process itself. Effect: The transaction could not be vouched during the testing process, and management may not be able to substantiate transactions recorded without support. We could not determine that the property was purchased at a reasonable price. Recommendation: We recommend that the assessed value documentation or other supporting documentation be kept on file for all related party transactions to ensure the property was purchased at a reasonable price. Managements Response: Recommendations are considered at the issuance of the report.
2022-004 Related Party Transaction Documentation Federal Program: CFDA# 27.027 Department of the Treasury Criteria: Related party transactions should be supported by proper documentation. Condition: During disbursement testing, we noted transactions recorded where proper documentation could not be located. During receipt and disbursement testing of the County's funds for federal awards testing, we noted that assessed value documentation of the purchase of a building for document storage from a related party couldn?t not be provided for one transaction sampled. Questioned Costs: $106,469.42. The questioned costs were determined by using a statistical sample. Context: Total federal funds expended during the fiscal year ending November 30, 2022 under this program totaled $953,712. Cause: These instances occur due to misfiling of documentation or management override of the approval process itself. Effect: The transaction could not be vouched during the testing process, and management may not be able to substantiate transactions recorded without support. We could not determine that the property was purchased at a reasonable price. Recommendation: We recommend that the assessed value documentation or other supporting documentation be kept on file for all related party transactions to ensure the property was purchased at a reasonable price. Managements Response: Recommendations are considered at the issuance of the report.