Audit 24560

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$3.30M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Organization: Town of Edinburgh (IN)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-05-02

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
20464 2022-002 Material Weakness - AB
596906 2022-002 Material Weakness - AB

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZH25GZNLP2M7 Scott Finley Auditee
8125263511 Beth Kelley, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesA. Basis of PresentationThe accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) includes the federalgrant activity of the Town under programs of the federal government for the year endedDecember 31, 2022. The information in the SEFA is presented in accordance with therequirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform AdministrativeRequirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UniformGuidance). Because the SEFA presents only a select portion of the operations of the Town,it is not intended to and does not present the financial position of the Town.B. Other Significant Accounting PoliciesExpenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Suchexpenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in OMBCircular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, or the costprinciples contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are notallowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on areimbursement basis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursementis received. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program: Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds Assistance Listings Number: 66.468 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): DW211014101 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The Town failed to properly design and implement a review of the invoices paid to one vendor during the audit period. Although one employee reviewed the invoices prior to them being sent to the Indiana Finance Authority for payment, there was no secondary review to ensure the expenditures were for an allowable activity or an allowable cost. This vendor accounted for 4 of the 17 (24 percent) claims paid from the grant funds. The lack of internal controls was isolated to the vendor noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls, which would include segregation of duties, that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Town at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the Town's management establish a system of internal controls, which would include segregation of duties, related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-002 Subject: Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Cluster - Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Federal Agency: Environmental Protection Agency Federal Program: Capitalization Grants for Drinking Water State Revolving Funds Assistance Listings Number: 66.468 Federal Award Number and Year (or Other Identifying Number): DW211014101 Pass-Through Entity: Indiana Finance Authority Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Audit Finding: Material Weakness Condition and Context The Town failed to properly design and implement a review of the invoices paid to one vendor during the audit period. Although one employee reviewed the invoices prior to them being sent to the Indiana Finance Authority for payment, there was no secondary review to ensure the expenditures were for an allowable activity or an allowable cost. This vendor accounted for 4 of the 17 (24 percent) claims paid from the grant funds. The lack of internal controls was isolated to the vendor noted above. Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 states in part: "The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ." Cause Management had not developed a system of internal controls, which would include segregation of duties, that would have ensured compliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Effect The failure to establish an effective internal control system placed the Town at risk of noncompliance with the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified. Recommendation We recommended the Town's management establish a system of internal controls, which would include segregation of duties, related to the grant agreement and the Activities Allowed or Unallowed and the Allowable Costs/Cost Principles compliance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials For the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.