FAC Explorer

Audit 24436

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$3.40M
Findings
0
Programs
6
Organization: City of Clemson, South Carolina (SC)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-01-30
Auditor: Mauldin & Jenkins CPAS and Advisors

Organization Exclusion Status:

Findings

No findings recorded

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
20.507 Federal Transit_formula Grants $1.06M Yes 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $201,081 - 0
20.526 Buses and Bus Facilities Formula, Competitive, and Low Or No Emissions Programs $111,922 Yes 0
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $80,000 - 0
16.835 Body Worn Camera Policy and Implementation $20,292 - 0
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $16,978 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
V9DFD5NDWLM8 Leslie Wilder Auditee
8646532038 Grant Davis Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATIONThe accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federalgrant activity of the City of Clemson, South Carolina (the City), and is presented on the modifiedaccrual basis of accounting for governmental fund types and the accrual basis of accounting for theproprietary fund types. The City reporting entity is described in Note 1 to the Citys basic financialstatements.The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S.Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, CostPrinciples, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in theschedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financialstatements.NOTE 2. DE MINIMIS INDIRECT COST RATEThe City chose not to use the ten percent de Minimis indirect cost rate for the year ended June 30,2022.NOTE 3. NON-CASH AWARDS AND LOANSThere were no federal awards expended in the form of noncash assistance during the fiscal year.There were also no loans or loan guarantees outstanding at year end. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.