Audit 23125

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$5.95M
Findings
2
Programs
14
Organization: Noxubee County School District (MS)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-06-14
Auditor: Brown CPA PLLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
26226 2022-001 Material Weakness - B
602668 2022-001 Material Weakness - B

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
DZGAK1KRP8A5 Pam Norris Auditee
6627264527 Clint Brown Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Other Items Accounting Policies: Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards(1) Basis of PresentationThe accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes thefederal award activity of the Noxubee County School District under programs of the federalgovernment for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented inaccordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, UniformAdministrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards(Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations ofthe Noxubee County School District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position,changes in net position, or cash flows of the Noxubee County School District.(2) Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesExpenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the same basis of accounting and the samesignificant accounting policies, as applicable, as those used for the financial statements; however,the expenditures include transfers out. Such expenditures are recognized following the costprinciples contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are notallowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule representadjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expendituresin prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. Donated commodities are included in the National School Lunch Program.E-rate funds have not been included on this schedule due to the fact the FCC considers the support to be in the form of providing a discount to the schools and libraries and does not consider the assistance to be direct financial support.

Finding Details

Section III: Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Material Weakness/Material Non-compliance 2022-001 Finding Internal Controls Surrounding Payroll Expenditures Program: COVID-19 ? Elementary & Secondary School Emergency Relief II (ESSER) Program Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D Compliance Requirement: Allowable Cost Repeat Finding: None Criteria: According to the U.S. Department of Education under the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act of 2021, Public Law 117-2, enacted on March 11, 2021 ESSER funds may be used for other activities that are necessary to maintain operation of a continuity of and services, including continuing to employ existing or hiring new LEA and school staff. Specifically, it does not identify hazard payments, bonuses, or premium payments to employees as eligible use of funds. Article 4 Section 96 of the Mississippi State Constitution prohibits extra compensation (bonuses) to any public employee. According to the AG opinion no. 2020-00144 ?hazard pay? must be ?(1) contracted for between the parties or with the employee prior to the date when services are to be performed; (2) determined in accordance with objective standards of measurement; and (3) earned by personal services performed by the employees.? Condition: During our testing of payroll expenditures, it was noted that all employees received a one time $1,700 payment at the end of the fiscal year titled ?hazard pay? to recognize efforts of employees to support students? health, safety, and academic gains during the COVID pandemic. Cause: The payment did not comply with the criteria referenced. The payment was not properly board approved prior to services performed and the employees did not perform additional services or jobs to earn the payment that could be recognized and measured. Effect: This could cause payroll expenditures to be misspent according to the ESSER II federal grant and Article 4 Section 96 of the Mississippi State Constitution. Questioned Cost: $398,951 ? estimated based on 218 employees pulled from the MDES quarterly report plus applicable payroll related taxes. Recommendation: The district should comply with the ESSER II federal grant based on the eligible use of funds outlined and Article 4 Section 96 of the Mississippi State Constitution. The district should not provide hazard payments to staff with federal funds. Additional payments should be board approved prior to services performed and employees should perform additional services that can be measured to earn the payment. Response: Please refer to the Auditee?s Corrective Action Plan beginning on page 73
Section III: Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs Material Weakness/Material Non-compliance 2022-001 Finding Internal Controls Surrounding Payroll Expenditures Program: COVID-19 ? Elementary & Secondary School Emergency Relief II (ESSER) Program Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D Compliance Requirement: Allowable Cost Repeat Finding: None Criteria: According to the U.S. Department of Education under the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act of 2021, Public Law 117-2, enacted on March 11, 2021 ESSER funds may be used for other activities that are necessary to maintain operation of a continuity of and services, including continuing to employ existing or hiring new LEA and school staff. Specifically, it does not identify hazard payments, bonuses, or premium payments to employees as eligible use of funds. Article 4 Section 96 of the Mississippi State Constitution prohibits extra compensation (bonuses) to any public employee. According to the AG opinion no. 2020-00144 ?hazard pay? must be ?(1) contracted for between the parties or with the employee prior to the date when services are to be performed; (2) determined in accordance with objective standards of measurement; and (3) earned by personal services performed by the employees.? Condition: During our testing of payroll expenditures, it was noted that all employees received a one time $1,700 payment at the end of the fiscal year titled ?hazard pay? to recognize efforts of employees to support students? health, safety, and academic gains during the COVID pandemic. Cause: The payment did not comply with the criteria referenced. The payment was not properly board approved prior to services performed and the employees did not perform additional services or jobs to earn the payment that could be recognized and measured. Effect: This could cause payroll expenditures to be misspent according to the ESSER II federal grant and Article 4 Section 96 of the Mississippi State Constitution. Questioned Cost: $398,951 ? estimated based on 218 employees pulled from the MDES quarterly report plus applicable payroll related taxes. Recommendation: The district should comply with the ESSER II federal grant based on the eligible use of funds outlined and Article 4 Section 96 of the Mississippi State Constitution. The district should not provide hazard payments to staff with federal funds. Additional payments should be board approved prior to services performed and employees should perform additional services that can be measured to earn the payment. Response: Please refer to the Auditee?s Corrective Action Plan beginning on page 73