Audit 22557

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$1.14M
Findings
6
Programs
3
Organization: Someplace Safe (MN)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-01-09
Auditor: Carlsonsv LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
24470 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
24471 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
24472 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
600912 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
600913 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
600914 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P

Contacts

Name Title Type
RKNUKPH9SFU9 Sheila Korby Auditee
2187393486 Dean Birkeland Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal award activity of Someplace Safe under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Someplace Safe, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Someplace Safe.Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles of the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

2021-001. Inadequate Segregation of Duties Condition: The Organization has a limited number of office personnel and, accordingly, does not have adequate separation of duties. An effective internal control structure provides an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to its completion. Criteria: A fundamental concept in a good system of internal controls is the segregation of incompatible duties. Cause: Due to the relatively small size of the Organization?s staff, the Organization is not able to attain ideal segregation of duties of separating the assignment of different people to authorize transactions, record transactions, and maintain custody of assets. Effect: This control deficiency could result in a misstatement to the financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Recommendation: Although it may not be economically feasible for the Organization to attain an ideal segregation of duties environment, the Organization can periodically observe and evaluate its current structure so as to make improvements when considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization has determined the benefit of adequately segregating duties is less than the cost. Based on the assessment, the Organization is accepting the risk posed by the deficiency while also evaluating mitigating controls that will help reduce the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements. Management attempts to mitigate the associated risks by doing the following: 1. Identifies areas where the lack of segregation of duties exists and where there are higher risks of errors or fraud occurring. 2. Implements limited segregation to the extent possible to reduce risks without impairing efficiency. 3. Uses the knowledge that management and the Board of Directors have of operations by having them review certain accounting records and reports. 4. Monitors the effectiveness of the above actions and makes changes as considered appropriate.
2021-001. Inadequate Segregation of Duties Condition: The Organization has a limited number of office personnel and, accordingly, does not have adequate separation of duties. An effective internal control structure provides an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to its completion. Criteria: A fundamental concept in a good system of internal controls is the segregation of incompatible duties. Cause: Due to the relatively small size of the Organization?s staff, the Organization is not able to attain ideal segregation of duties of separating the assignment of different people to authorize transactions, record transactions, and maintain custody of assets. Effect: This control deficiency could result in a misstatement to the financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Recommendation: Although it may not be economically feasible for the Organization to attain an ideal segregation of duties environment, the Organization can periodically observe and evaluate its current structure so as to make improvements when considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization has determined the benefit of adequately segregating duties is less than the cost. Based on the assessment, the Organization is accepting the risk posed by the deficiency while also evaluating mitigating controls that will help reduce the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements. Management attempts to mitigate the associated risks by doing the following: 1. Identifies areas where the lack of segregation of duties exists and where there are higher risks of errors or fraud occurring. 2. Implements limited segregation to the extent possible to reduce risks without impairing efficiency. 3. Uses the knowledge that management and the Board of Directors have of operations by having them review certain accounting records and reports. 4. Monitors the effectiveness of the above actions and makes changes as considered appropriate.
2021-001. Inadequate Segregation of Duties Condition: The Organization has a limited number of office personnel and, accordingly, does not have adequate separation of duties. An effective internal control structure provides an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to its completion. Criteria: A fundamental concept in a good system of internal controls is the segregation of incompatible duties. Cause: Due to the relatively small size of the Organization?s staff, the Organization is not able to attain ideal segregation of duties of separating the assignment of different people to authorize transactions, record transactions, and maintain custody of assets. Effect: This control deficiency could result in a misstatement to the financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Recommendation: Although it may not be economically feasible for the Organization to attain an ideal segregation of duties environment, the Organization can periodically observe and evaluate its current structure so as to make improvements when considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization has determined the benefit of adequately segregating duties is less than the cost. Based on the assessment, the Organization is accepting the risk posed by the deficiency while also evaluating mitigating controls that will help reduce the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements. Management attempts to mitigate the associated risks by doing the following: 1. Identifies areas where the lack of segregation of duties exists and where there are higher risks of errors or fraud occurring. 2. Implements limited segregation to the extent possible to reduce risks without impairing efficiency. 3. Uses the knowledge that management and the Board of Directors have of operations by having them review certain accounting records and reports. 4. Monitors the effectiveness of the above actions and makes changes as considered appropriate.
2021-001. Inadequate Segregation of Duties Condition: The Organization has a limited number of office personnel and, accordingly, does not have adequate separation of duties. An effective internal control structure provides an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to its completion. Criteria: A fundamental concept in a good system of internal controls is the segregation of incompatible duties. Cause: Due to the relatively small size of the Organization?s staff, the Organization is not able to attain ideal segregation of duties of separating the assignment of different people to authorize transactions, record transactions, and maintain custody of assets. Effect: This control deficiency could result in a misstatement to the financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Recommendation: Although it may not be economically feasible for the Organization to attain an ideal segregation of duties environment, the Organization can periodically observe and evaluate its current structure so as to make improvements when considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization has determined the benefit of adequately segregating duties is less than the cost. Based on the assessment, the Organization is accepting the risk posed by the deficiency while also evaluating mitigating controls that will help reduce the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements. Management attempts to mitigate the associated risks by doing the following: 1. Identifies areas where the lack of segregation of duties exists and where there are higher risks of errors or fraud occurring. 2. Implements limited segregation to the extent possible to reduce risks without impairing efficiency. 3. Uses the knowledge that management and the Board of Directors have of operations by having them review certain accounting records and reports. 4. Monitors the effectiveness of the above actions and makes changes as considered appropriate.
2021-001. Inadequate Segregation of Duties Condition: The Organization has a limited number of office personnel and, accordingly, does not have adequate separation of duties. An effective internal control structure provides an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to its completion. Criteria: A fundamental concept in a good system of internal controls is the segregation of incompatible duties. Cause: Due to the relatively small size of the Organization?s staff, the Organization is not able to attain ideal segregation of duties of separating the assignment of different people to authorize transactions, record transactions, and maintain custody of assets. Effect: This control deficiency could result in a misstatement to the financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Recommendation: Although it may not be economically feasible for the Organization to attain an ideal segregation of duties environment, the Organization can periodically observe and evaluate its current structure so as to make improvements when considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization has determined the benefit of adequately segregating duties is less than the cost. Based on the assessment, the Organization is accepting the risk posed by the deficiency while also evaluating mitigating controls that will help reduce the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements. Management attempts to mitigate the associated risks by doing the following: 1. Identifies areas where the lack of segregation of duties exists and where there are higher risks of errors or fraud occurring. 2. Implements limited segregation to the extent possible to reduce risks without impairing efficiency. 3. Uses the knowledge that management and the Board of Directors have of operations by having them review certain accounting records and reports. 4. Monitors the effectiveness of the above actions and makes changes as considered appropriate.
2021-001. Inadequate Segregation of Duties Condition: The Organization has a limited number of office personnel and, accordingly, does not have adequate separation of duties. An effective internal control structure provides an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to its completion. Criteria: A fundamental concept in a good system of internal controls is the segregation of incompatible duties. Cause: Due to the relatively small size of the Organization?s staff, the Organization is not able to attain ideal segregation of duties of separating the assignment of different people to authorize transactions, record transactions, and maintain custody of assets. Effect: This control deficiency could result in a misstatement to the financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Recommendation: Although it may not be economically feasible for the Organization to attain an ideal segregation of duties environment, the Organization can periodically observe and evaluate its current structure so as to make improvements when considered necessary. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization has determined the benefit of adequately segregating duties is less than the cost. Based on the assessment, the Organization is accepting the risk posed by the deficiency while also evaluating mitigating controls that will help reduce the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements. Management attempts to mitigate the associated risks by doing the following: 1. Identifies areas where the lack of segregation of duties exists and where there are higher risks of errors or fraud occurring. 2. Implements limited segregation to the extent possible to reduce risks without impairing efficiency. 3. Uses the knowledge that management and the Board of Directors have of operations by having them review certain accounting records and reports. 4. Monitors the effectiveness of the above actions and makes changes as considered appropriate.