Notes to SEFA
Accounting Policies: 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATIONThe accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards of (the Schedule) include the federal grant activity of the California Association for Economic Development & Affiliate (the Organization") under programs of the federal government for the fiscal year then ended June 30, 2022. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Audits (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule represents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the combined financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization for the year then ended.2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIESExpenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. 3. INDIRECT COST RATEThe Organization has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. 4. SUBSEQUENT EVENTOn January 3, 2023, the California Academy for Economic Development (Affiliate) and the California Office of the Small Business Advocate (sub-recipient) entered into sub-award agreement (sub-agreement) for the Outsmart Disaster Resiliency Training. The sub-recipient portion of the federal grant is $350,000.Management has reviewed its financial statements and evaluated subsequent events for the period of time from its year ended June 30, 2022 through September 11, 2023, the date the financial statements were issued. Management is not aware of any subsequent events, other than those described above, that would require recognition or disclosure in the accompanying financial statements.
De Minimis Rate Used: N
Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.