Audit 21081

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$927,807
Findings
2
Programs
3
Organization: The Grand Oshkosh, Inc. (WI)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-06-12

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
24133 2022-003 Material Weakness - B
600575 2022-003 Material Weakness - B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
59.008 Disaster Assistance Loans $500,000 Yes 0
59.075 Shuttered Venue Operators Grant Program $263,206 Yes 1
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $164,601 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
MFM3MEDPHQH7 Ann Pisthol Auditee
9254242535 Steve Johnson, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION ECONOMIC INJURY DISASTER LOAN PROGRAM Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, or the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The federal disaster loan program listed subsequently is administered directly by The Grand Oshkosh, Inc., and the balance and transactions relating to this program are included in The Grand Oshkosh, Inc.s basic financial statements. The loan made during the year is included in the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule. The loan balance outstanding at June 30, 2022 was as follows: COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan, $500,000 outstanding.
Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, or the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of The Grand Oshkosh, Inc.s programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of The Grand Oshkosh, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of The Grand Oshkosh, Inc..

Finding Details

2022-003: Supporting documentation Federal Agency: U.S. Small Business Administration Federal Program Name: Shuttered Venue Operator Grant Assistant Listing Number: 59.075 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SBAHQ21SV000963.2-2022 Award Period: July 8, 2021 through June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards and SVOG Post-Award FAQs requires compliance with the provisions of allowable costs and cost principles. The organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: During our testing, we noted the organization did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure maintenance of clear records of the costs charged to the SVOG award substantiating eligibility and allowability. Questioned Costs: $625 actual, $7,243 likely Context: During our testing, we noted the organization did not retain documentation supporting costs charged to the grant for 6 of 60 transactions. Cause: The organization was unaware that emails supporting costs were no longer available after information technology system migration. Effect: No instances of noncompliance with the provision of allowable costs and cost principles were noted, based on description of expense and vendor services; however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the organization design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review costs charged to grants are properly supported by documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no significant disagreement with the audit finding.
2022-003: Supporting documentation Federal Agency: U.S. Small Business Administration Federal Program Name: Shuttered Venue Operator Grant Assistant Listing Number: 59.075 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SBAHQ21SV000963.2-2022 Award Period: July 8, 2021 through June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance ? Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards and SVOG Post-Award FAQs requires compliance with the provisions of allowable costs and cost principles. The organization should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: During our testing, we noted the organization did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure maintenance of clear records of the costs charged to the SVOG award substantiating eligibility and allowability. Questioned Costs: $625 actual, $7,243 likely Context: During our testing, we noted the organization did not retain documentation supporting costs charged to the grant for 6 of 60 transactions. Cause: The organization was unaware that emails supporting costs were no longer available after information technology system migration. Effect: No instances of noncompliance with the provision of allowable costs and cost principles were noted, based on description of expense and vendor services; however, the lack of internal controls over these compliance requirements provides an opportunity for noncompliance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the organization design controls to ensure an adequate review process is in place to review costs charged to grants are properly supported by documentation. Views of responsible officials: There is no significant disagreement with the audit finding.