Audit 20682

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$286.83M
Findings
0
Programs
8
Organization: Institute for Defense Analyses (VA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-06-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

No findings recorded

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
12.RD Maryland Procurement Office $74.76M Yes 0
47.RD Office of Science and Technology Policy Institute $11.61M Yes 0
13.RD Odni (e12) $1.36M Yes 0
81.RD Department of Energy $266,009 Yes 0
12.RD Ipa - Intergovernmental Personnel Act $177,549 Yes 0
12.RD Washington Headquarters Service Acquisition Directorate $86,144 Yes 0
12.RD Naval Sea Systems Command $9,398 Yes 0
43.RD NASA $120 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
JM98J68UPRK1 Jack Tade Auditee
7038452389 Sandra Aresti Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) for the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting which conforms to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and is consistent with the IDA's basic financial statements. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of applicable guidance, therefore some amounts presented in the Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the financial statements. For purposes of the Schedule, federal awards include all grants, contracts and similar agreements entered directly between IDA and agencies and departments of the federal government and all sub-awards to IDA by non-federal organizations pursuant to federal grants, contracts and similar agreements. For the purpose of the Schedule, expenditures for federal award programs are recognized on the accrual basis of accounting.Negative numbers in the schedule represent adjustments to amounts previously reported in the normal course of business. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Institute has negotiated an indirect cost rate with the Defense Contract Management Agency as our cognizant agency for indirect costs. As such, the Institute did not elect to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.