Audit 19213

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$867,361
Findings
4
Programs
4
Organization: Farmworker Justice (DC)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
20088 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - I
20089 2022-003 Significant Deficiency - CL
596530 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - I
596531 2022-003 Significant Deficiency - CL

Contacts

Name Title Type
P5KWHV8QH7F1 Ronald Estrada Auditee
2028002523 Susan Colladay Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in OMB Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations, or the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-002: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Federal Program: 93.224 - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires that, for covered transactions, a non-Federal entity must verify that entities are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) website maintained by the General Services Administration. Condition: For all disbursements tested, the Organization could not provide documentation of their verification, prior to payment, that the vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: $- Cause: The Organization did not require evidence of SAM checks be maintained in its vendor files. As a result, the Organization did not maintain adequate support to provide evidence that appropriate suspension and debarment searches were performed. Despite the lack of documentation, a search was performed after the fact to verify that the vendors or individuals in our sample were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Therefore, no questioned costs have been reported related to the sample that was tested. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the procurement documentation requirements of the Uniform Guidance. As a result, the Organization could not readily provide evidence that it had assessed whether or not its vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. As a result, the potential for payments to suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded vendors and individuals exists. Recommendation: The Organization should establish internal controls to ensure proper documentation is maintained as evidence to support that the Organization performed the required suspension and debarment searches on the SAM website.
Finding 2022-003: Cash Management and Reporting (Significant Deficiency) Federal Programs: 93.224 - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires auditees to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Organization did not maintain documentary evidence of the review and approval of either its requests for cash draw downs or its performance reports in accordance with the internal control requirements. Questioned Costs: $- Cause: The Organization's management team works collaboratively to prepare the requests for cash draw downs and prepare the performance reports prior to submission. Per discussion with management, the review and approval is performed verbally during this process. As a result, the Organization was not able to provide adequate support to document the review and approval of either its requests for cash draw downs or its performance reports. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organization was not able to provide evidence of the implementation of internal controls related to review and approval for cash draw downs and performance reports. Therefore, these submissions may have been inaccurately prepared. Recommendation: The Organization should retain documentary evidence of its review and approval process, which should occur prior to submission of the requests for cash draw downs and performance reports.
Finding 2022-002: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment (Significant Deficiency) Federal Program: 93.224 - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Section 200.214 requires that, for covered transactions, a non-Federal entity must verify that entities are not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. This verification may be accomplished by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) website maintained by the General Services Administration. Condition: For all disbursements tested, the Organization could not provide documentation of their verification, prior to payment, that the vendors were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Questioned Costs: $- Cause: The Organization did not require evidence of SAM checks be maintained in its vendor files. As a result, the Organization did not maintain adequate support to provide evidence that appropriate suspension and debarment searches were performed. Despite the lack of documentation, a search was performed after the fact to verify that the vendors or individuals in our sample were not suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded. Therefore, no questioned costs have been reported related to the sample that was tested. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organization was not in compliance with the procurement documentation requirements of the Uniform Guidance. As a result, the Organization could not readily provide evidence that it had assessed whether or not its vendors were suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. As a result, the potential for payments to suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded vendors and individuals exists. Recommendation: The Organization should establish internal controls to ensure proper documentation is maintained as evidence to support that the Organization performed the required suspension and debarment searches on the SAM website.
Finding 2022-003: Cash Management and Reporting (Significant Deficiency) Federal Programs: 93.224 - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Section 200.303 requires auditees to establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The Organization did not maintain documentary evidence of the review and approval of either its requests for cash draw downs or its performance reports in accordance with the internal control requirements. Questioned Costs: $- Cause: The Organization's management team works collaboratively to prepare the requests for cash draw downs and prepare the performance reports prior to submission. Per discussion with management, the review and approval is performed verbally during this process. As a result, the Organization was not able to provide adequate support to document the review and approval of either its requests for cash draw downs or its performance reports. Effect or Potential Effect: The Organization was not able to provide evidence of the implementation of internal controls related to review and approval for cash draw downs and performance reports. Therefore, these submissions may have been inaccurately prepared. Recommendation: The Organization should retain documentary evidence of its review and approval process, which should occur prior to submission of the requests for cash draw downs and performance reports.