Audit 18254

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$876,721
Findings
8
Programs
9
Organization: Waltonville Cusd 1 (IL)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
19898 2022-001 Material Weakness - L
19899 2022-001 Material Weakness - L
19900 2022-001 Material Weakness - L
19901 2022-001 Material Weakness - L
596340 2022-001 Material Weakness - L
596341 2022-001 Material Weakness - L
596342 2022-001 Material Weakness - L
596343 2022-001 Material Weakness - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.027 Special Education_grants to States $141,433 - 0
10.553 School Breakfast Program $41,577 Yes 0
84.010 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies $35,198 - 0
10.555 National School Lunch Program $12,121 Yes 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $8,063 - 0
84.048 Career and Technical Education -- Basic Grants to States $6,156 - 0
84.367 Improving Teacher Quality State Grants $1,721 - 0
84.173 Special Education_preschool Grants $1,591 - 0
84.425 Education Stabilization Fund $648 Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
NZ31UVGKMQ33 Michael Denault Auditee
6182793291 Bo Thomas Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation - The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Waltonville Community Unit District No. 1 and is presented on the cash basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the cash basis financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Criteria - District policy requires formal bidding procurement for expenditures in excess of $25,000 in compliance with 105 ILCS 5/10-20.21, unless specifically exempted. Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.320 also requires competitive procurement for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. Condition - We reviewed the District's purchase of playground equipment and installation in the amount of $89,100 under the ESSER III grant award. The District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement or explicit approval of exemption from competitive procurement procedures. Context - Although the District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement for the playground equipment, the December 16, 2021 Board of Education meeting minutes indicate explicit approval of the procurement in advance of work performed and payment made. Additionally, the Board of Education meeting minutes indicate performance of competitive bids for other District purchases. Effect - The District purchased $89,100 of playground equipment and installation from one vendor without obtaining bids or quotes; therefore the District cannot be sure it received teh best possible price for the equipment and installation under the ESSER program. Cause - The District has not historically used federal grant awards to fund procurements in excess of federal micro-purchase thresholds and was not aware of the competitive procurement requirements for federal awrds under uniform guidance. Recommendation - We recommend the District review their procurement policy and Uniform Guidance procurement requirements to ensure compliance with future purchases in excess of $25,000.
Criteria - District policy requires formal bidding procurement for expenditures in excess of $25,000 in compliance with 105 ILCS 5/10-20.21, unless specifically exempted. Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.320 also requires competitive procurement for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. Condition - We reviewed the District's purchase of playground equipment and installation in the amount of $89,100 under the ESSER III grant award. The District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement or explicit approval of exemption from competitive procurement procedures. Context - Although the District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement for the playground equipment, the December 16, 2021 Board of Education meeting minutes indicate explicit approval of the procurement in advance of work performed and payment made. Additionally, the Board of Education meeting minutes indicate performance of competitive bids for other District purchases. Effect - The District purchased $89,100 of playground equipment and installation from one vendor without obtaining bids or quotes; therefore the District cannot be sure it received teh best possible price for the equipment and installation under the ESSER program. Cause - The District has not historically used federal grant awards to fund procurements in excess of federal micro-purchase thresholds and was not aware of the competitive procurement requirements for federal awrds under uniform guidance. Recommendation - We recommend the District review their procurement policy and Uniform Guidance procurement requirements to ensure compliance with future purchases in excess of $25,000.
Criteria - District policy requires formal bidding procurement for expenditures in excess of $25,000 in compliance with 105 ILCS 5/10-20.21, unless specifically exempted. Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.320 also requires competitive procurement for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. Condition - We reviewed the District's purchase of playground equipment and installation in the amount of $89,100 under the ESSER III grant award. The District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement or explicit approval of exemption from competitive procurement procedures. Context - Although the District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement for the playground equipment, the December 16, 2021 Board of Education meeting minutes indicate explicit approval of the procurement in advance of work performed and payment made. Additionally, the Board of Education meeting minutes indicate performance of competitive bids for other District purchases. Effect - The District purchased $89,100 of playground equipment and installation from one vendor without obtaining bids or quotes; therefore the District cannot be sure it received teh best possible price for the equipment and installation under the ESSER program. Cause - The District has not historically used federal grant awards to fund procurements in excess of federal micro-purchase thresholds and was not aware of the competitive procurement requirements for federal awrds under uniform guidance. Recommendation - We recommend the District review their procurement policy and Uniform Guidance procurement requirements to ensure compliance with future purchases in excess of $25,000.
Criteria - District policy requires formal bidding procurement for expenditures in excess of $25,000 in compliance with 105 ILCS 5/10-20.21, unless specifically exempted. Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.320 also requires competitive procurement for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. Condition - We reviewed the District's purchase of playground equipment and installation in the amount of $89,100 under the ESSER III grant award. The District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement or explicit approval of exemption from competitive procurement procedures. Context - Although the District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement for the playground equipment, the December 16, 2021 Board of Education meeting minutes indicate explicit approval of the procurement in advance of work performed and payment made. Additionally, the Board of Education meeting minutes indicate performance of competitive bids for other District purchases. Effect - The District purchased $89,100 of playground equipment and installation from one vendor without obtaining bids or quotes; therefore the District cannot be sure it received teh best possible price for the equipment and installation under the ESSER program. Cause - The District has not historically used federal grant awards to fund procurements in excess of federal micro-purchase thresholds and was not aware of the competitive procurement requirements for federal awrds under uniform guidance. Recommendation - We recommend the District review their procurement policy and Uniform Guidance procurement requirements to ensure compliance with future purchases in excess of $25,000.
Criteria - District policy requires formal bidding procurement for expenditures in excess of $25,000 in compliance with 105 ILCS 5/10-20.21, unless specifically exempted. Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.320 also requires competitive procurement for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. Condition - We reviewed the District's purchase of playground equipment and installation in the amount of $89,100 under the ESSER III grant award. The District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement or explicit approval of exemption from competitive procurement procedures. Context - Although the District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement for the playground equipment, the December 16, 2021 Board of Education meeting minutes indicate explicit approval of the procurement in advance of work performed and payment made. Additionally, the Board of Education meeting minutes indicate performance of competitive bids for other District purchases. Effect - The District purchased $89,100 of playground equipment and installation from one vendor without obtaining bids or quotes; therefore the District cannot be sure it received teh best possible price for the equipment and installation under the ESSER program. Cause - The District has not historically used federal grant awards to fund procurements in excess of federal micro-purchase thresholds and was not aware of the competitive procurement requirements for federal awrds under uniform guidance. Recommendation - We recommend the District review their procurement policy and Uniform Guidance procurement requirements to ensure compliance with future purchases in excess of $25,000.
Criteria - District policy requires formal bidding procurement for expenditures in excess of $25,000 in compliance with 105 ILCS 5/10-20.21, unless specifically exempted. Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.320 also requires competitive procurement for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. Condition - We reviewed the District's purchase of playground equipment and installation in the amount of $89,100 under the ESSER III grant award. The District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement or explicit approval of exemption from competitive procurement procedures. Context - Although the District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement for the playground equipment, the December 16, 2021 Board of Education meeting minutes indicate explicit approval of the procurement in advance of work performed and payment made. Additionally, the Board of Education meeting minutes indicate performance of competitive bids for other District purchases. Effect - The District purchased $89,100 of playground equipment and installation from one vendor without obtaining bids or quotes; therefore the District cannot be sure it received teh best possible price for the equipment and installation under the ESSER program. Cause - The District has not historically used federal grant awards to fund procurements in excess of federal micro-purchase thresholds and was not aware of the competitive procurement requirements for federal awrds under uniform guidance. Recommendation - We recommend the District review their procurement policy and Uniform Guidance procurement requirements to ensure compliance with future purchases in excess of $25,000.
Criteria - District policy requires formal bidding procurement for expenditures in excess of $25,000 in compliance with 105 ILCS 5/10-20.21, unless specifically exempted. Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.320 also requires competitive procurement for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. Condition - We reviewed the District's purchase of playground equipment and installation in the amount of $89,100 under the ESSER III grant award. The District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement or explicit approval of exemption from competitive procurement procedures. Context - Although the District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement for the playground equipment, the December 16, 2021 Board of Education meeting minutes indicate explicit approval of the procurement in advance of work performed and payment made. Additionally, the Board of Education meeting minutes indicate performance of competitive bids for other District purchases. Effect - The District purchased $89,100 of playground equipment and installation from one vendor without obtaining bids or quotes; therefore the District cannot be sure it received teh best possible price for the equipment and installation under the ESSER program. Cause - The District has not historically used federal grant awards to fund procurements in excess of federal micro-purchase thresholds and was not aware of the competitive procurement requirements for federal awrds under uniform guidance. Recommendation - We recommend the District review their procurement policy and Uniform Guidance procurement requirements to ensure compliance with future purchases in excess of $25,000.
Criteria - District policy requires formal bidding procurement for expenditures in excess of $25,000 in compliance with 105 ILCS 5/10-20.21, unless specifically exempted. Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.320 also requires competitive procurement for purchases exceeding the micro-purchase threshold. Condition - We reviewed the District's purchase of playground equipment and installation in the amount of $89,100 under the ESSER III grant award. The District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement or explicit approval of exemption from competitive procurement procedures. Context - Although the District was unable to provide documentation supporting competitive procurement for the playground equipment, the December 16, 2021 Board of Education meeting minutes indicate explicit approval of the procurement in advance of work performed and payment made. Additionally, the Board of Education meeting minutes indicate performance of competitive bids for other District purchases. Effect - The District purchased $89,100 of playground equipment and installation from one vendor without obtaining bids or quotes; therefore the District cannot be sure it received teh best possible price for the equipment and installation under the ESSER program. Cause - The District has not historically used federal grant awards to fund procurements in excess of federal micro-purchase thresholds and was not aware of the competitive procurement requirements for federal awrds under uniform guidance. Recommendation - We recommend the District review their procurement policy and Uniform Guidance procurement requirements to ensure compliance with future purchases in excess of $25,000.