Audit 18211

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$884,131
Findings
2
Programs
3
Organization: The Richstone Center, Inc. (CA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-03-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
19960 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes G
596402 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes G

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $468,897 Yes 1
93.994 Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant to the States $326,354 - 0
93.569 Community Services Block Grant $88,880 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
NW5WQSYVFG87 Alicia Ramirez Auditee
3109701921 Jeffery Black Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on this schedule are presented using accrual basis of accounting as described inthe Note 2 of the Organizations basic financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized followingthe cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures may ormay not be allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

2022-001 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services CFDA 93.778, 2021 Award Year, Award Number: Not Provided Medical Assistance Program Compliance Requirement: Matching Level of Effort Type of Finding: Compliance Criteria: The contract requires assigned staff to be qualified in accordance with standards established by the County of Los Angeles. Those standards include signed disclosures made by the employee upon hire of Organization and where applicable, grant policies, an annual performance evaluation of all assigned employees to the programs, and documentation of notification that the employee is approved by the County of Los Angeles to participate in the program(s). Condition: One personnel file lacked required employee evaluation. Cause: In one case, a personnel file lacked a required employee evaluation in accordance with the grant requirements. Effect: Lack of required employee documentation might suggest that staff assigned to various programs are unaware of policies unique to the grants and thereby compromise program quality control of services provided in accordance with the contract. Questioned Costs: N/A. Context/Sampling: Auditor sampled 51 of 108 monthly payments to 12 employees who participated in the programs and were claimed for reimbursement for the year ended June 30, 2022. There was one exception of a required employee evaluation not found in the personnel file. Repeat Finding From Prior Year: Yes Recommendation: Review the personnel files annually and verify that employee evaluations have been completed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with finding. The corrective action plan to be implemented to make sure that employees receive their annual evaluation is that the HR manager will review all personnel files and confirm that all evaluations are completed and conduct any evaluations that are not complete. They will implement Paychex to track evaluation due dates.
2022-001 U.S. Department of Health & Human Services CFDA 93.778, 2021 Award Year, Award Number: Not Provided Medical Assistance Program Compliance Requirement: Matching Level of Effort Type of Finding: Compliance Criteria: The contract requires assigned staff to be qualified in accordance with standards established by the County of Los Angeles. Those standards include signed disclosures made by the employee upon hire of Organization and where applicable, grant policies, an annual performance evaluation of all assigned employees to the programs, and documentation of notification that the employee is approved by the County of Los Angeles to participate in the program(s). Condition: One personnel file lacked required employee evaluation. Cause: In one case, a personnel file lacked a required employee evaluation in accordance with the grant requirements. Effect: Lack of required employee documentation might suggest that staff assigned to various programs are unaware of policies unique to the grants and thereby compromise program quality control of services provided in accordance with the contract. Questioned Costs: N/A. Context/Sampling: Auditor sampled 51 of 108 monthly payments to 12 employees who participated in the programs and were claimed for reimbursement for the year ended June 30, 2022. There was one exception of a required employee evaluation not found in the personnel file. Repeat Finding From Prior Year: Yes Recommendation: Review the personnel files annually and verify that employee evaluations have been completed. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: Management agrees with finding. The corrective action plan to be implemented to make sure that employees receive their annual evaluation is that the HR manager will review all personnel files and confirm that all evaluations are completed and conduct any evaluations that are not complete. They will implement Paychex to track evaluation due dates.