Audit 18045

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$1.01M
Findings
2
Programs
4
Organization: Restore Nyc, Inc. (NY)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-06-26
Auditor: Sax LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
12555 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes AB
588997 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes AB

Contacts

Name Title Type
H8QGU55CQ4T5 Vanessa Holliday Auditee
2128408484 David Ashenfarb Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 3 - Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards are presented on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance. Under federal cost principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of the Organization under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Note 4 - Sub-Recipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards are presented on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance. Under federal cost principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate. There were no amounts provided to sub-recipients from federal awards received during the year ended September 30, 2022.

Finding Details

Criteria: Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i)Be supported by a system of internal control, which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii)Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii)Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities; (iv)Encompass both federally assisted, and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis; (v)Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; (vi)Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities, which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Citation: 2 CFR 200.430(i) Condition: Electronic timesheets are maintained for all employees to document time spent on this grant as required by the funder; however, there was no evidence of supervisory review available within the timekeeping system for the period covering October 2021 through May 2022. For the period after May 2022 through August 31, 2022, the review was inconsistently documented. Cause: There was no evidence of the supervisory review to ensure salary expense was distributed to specific Federal awards for the period from October 2021 to May 2022. Effect: There is a risk that the salary of an employee could be distributed to a federal award at an amount that is different than the actual time spent on that Federal program. Context: We reviewed timesheets and noted the entity?s system of internal control was not designed to include a supervisors? review of the accuracy of timesheets to verify that an employees? time was distributed to the program that they spent time on from October 2021 to May 2022. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that all timesheets and other electronic records used to track time spent on the program be reviewed by a supervisor and that this review be documented.
Criteria: Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: (i)Be supported by a system of internal control, which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated; (ii)Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity; (iii)Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities; (iv)Encompass both federally assisted, and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis; (v)Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; (vi)Support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities, which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Citation: 2 CFR 200.430(i) Condition: Electronic timesheets are maintained for all employees to document time spent on this grant as required by the funder; however, there was no evidence of supervisory review available within the timekeeping system for the period covering October 2021 through May 2022. For the period after May 2022 through August 31, 2022, the review was inconsistently documented. Cause: There was no evidence of the supervisory review to ensure salary expense was distributed to specific Federal awards for the period from October 2021 to May 2022. Effect: There is a risk that the salary of an employee could be distributed to a federal award at an amount that is different than the actual time spent on that Federal program. Context: We reviewed timesheets and noted the entity?s system of internal control was not designed to include a supervisors? review of the accuracy of timesheets to verify that an employees? time was distributed to the program that they spent time on from October 2021 to May 2022. Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that all timesheets and other electronic records used to track time spent on the program be reviewed by a supervisor and that this review be documented.