Condition During our audit, we examined six haphazardly selected subrecipient monitoring reports and identified one subrecipient for which the financial review portion of their subrecipient monitoring was not performed timely. Criteria 2 CFR 92.504(d) requires a financial review to be performed at least annually for rental projects with 10 or more units. Effect Failure to perform reviews timely may result in subrecipients misusing or mismanaging program funds. Cause Due to significant staffing turnover and COVID 19 pandemic restrictions, the City was unable to perform timely reviews and complete the monitoring reports. Recommendation Management should create policies and procedures to ensure required monitoring procedures are performed and completed timely.
Condition During our audit, we examined 25 haphazardly selected failed Housing Quality Standards (?HQS?) inspections to test if corrections and verifications of corrections were performed within the correction period and proper action taken by the Public Housing Agency (?PHA?). We identified for one owner, verification of correction was performed after the correction period, but no housing assistance payments (?HAP?) were abated. Criteria 24 CFR 92.252(a) provides certain rental assistance limitations that apply to the rent plus the tenant?s utility allowance. The maximum rent is the lesser of 1) the fair market rent for existing housing for comparable units in the area as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (?HUD?) under 24 CFR 888.111; or 2) a rent that does not exceed 30% of the adjusted income of a family whose annual income equals 65% of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for number of bedrooms in the unit. The HOME rent limits provided by HUD include average occupancy per unit and adjusted income assumptions. 24 CFR sections 982.404(a) requires owners to maintain units in accordance with HQS. If an owner fails to maintain a dwelling in accordance with HQS and fails to correct the HQS deficiencies within the correction period, the PHA should abate HAP or terminate the contract. Effect As the City verified correction of HQS deficiencies after the correction period, HAP in the amount of $12,222 was improperly disbursed in the year ended June 30, 2022 resulting in questioned costs. Cause Although the City has policies and procedures in place to ensure proper HQS enforcement, there was a lack of diligence in complying with the policies and procedures due to staffing shortages. Recommendation We recommend the City be more diligent in following its policies and procedures for tracking, documenting and performing HQS inspections and taking appropriate action timely when an owner fails to correct HQS deficiencies identified.
Condition During our audit, we examined 25 haphazardly selected failed Housing Quality Standards (?HQS?) inspections to test if corrections and verifications of corrections were performed within the correction period and proper action taken by the Public Housing Agency (?PHA?). We identified for one owner, verification of correction was performed after the correction period, but no housing assistance payments (?HAP?) were abated. Criteria 24 CFR 92.252(a) provides certain rental assistance limitations that apply to the rent plus the tenant?s utility allowance. The maximum rent is the lesser of 1) the fair market rent for existing housing for comparable units in the area as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (?HUD?) under 24 CFR 888.111; or 2) a rent that does not exceed 30% of the adjusted income of a family whose annual income equals 65% of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for number of bedrooms in the unit. The HOME rent limits provided by HUD include average occupancy per unit and adjusted income assumptions. 24 CFR sections 982.404(a) requires owners to maintain units in accordance with HQS. If an owner fails to maintain a dwelling in accordance with HQS and fails to correct the HQS deficiencies within the correction period, the PHA should abate HAP or terminate the contract. Effect As the City verified correction of HQS deficiencies after the correction period, HAP in the amount of $12,222 was improperly disbursed in the year ended June 30, 2022 resulting in questioned costs. Cause Although the City has policies and procedures in place to ensure proper HQS enforcement, there was a lack of diligence in complying with the policies and procedures due to staffing shortages. Recommendation We recommend the City be more diligent in following its policies and procedures for tracking, documenting and performing HQS inspections and taking appropriate action timely when an owner fails to correct HQS deficiencies identified.
Condition During our audit, we examined 25 haphazardly selected failed Housing Quality Standards (?HQS?) inspections to test if corrections and verifications of corrections were performed within the correction period and proper action taken by the Public Housing Agency (?PHA?). We identified for one owner, verification of correction was performed after the correction period, but no housing assistance payments (?HAP?) were abated. Criteria 24 CFR 92.252(a) provides certain rental assistance limitations that apply to the rent plus the tenant?s utility allowance. The maximum rent is the lesser of 1) the fair market rent for existing housing for comparable units in the area as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (?HUD?) under 24 CFR 888.111; or 2) a rent that does not exceed 30% of the adjusted income of a family whose annual income equals 65% of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for number of bedrooms in the unit. The HOME rent limits provided by HUD include average occupancy per unit and adjusted income assumptions. 24 CFR sections 982.404(a) requires owners to maintain units in accordance with HQS. If an owner fails to maintain a dwelling in accordance with HQS and fails to correct the HQS deficiencies within the correction period, the PHA should abate HAP or terminate the contract. Effect As the City verified correction of HQS deficiencies after the correction period, HAP in the amount of $12,222 was improperly disbursed in the year ended June 30, 2022 resulting in questioned costs. Cause Although the City has policies and procedures in place to ensure proper HQS enforcement, there was a lack of diligence in complying with the policies and procedures due to staffing shortages. Recommendation We recommend the City be more diligent in following its policies and procedures for tracking, documenting and performing HQS inspections and taking appropriate action timely when an owner fails to correct HQS deficiencies identified.
Condition During our audit, we examined 25 haphazardly selected failed Housing Quality Standards (?HQS?) inspections to test if corrections and verifications of corrections were performed within the correction period and proper action taken by the Public Housing Agency (?PHA?). We identified for one owner, verification of correction was performed after the correction period, but no housing assistance payments (?HAP?) were abated. Criteria 24 CFR 92.252(a) provides certain rental assistance limitations that apply to the rent plus the tenant?s utility allowance. The maximum rent is the lesser of 1) the fair market rent for existing housing for comparable units in the area as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (?HUD?) under 24 CFR 888.111; or 2) a rent that does not exceed 30% of the adjusted income of a family whose annual income equals 65% of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for number of bedrooms in the unit. The HOME rent limits provided by HUD include average occupancy per unit and adjusted income assumptions. 24 CFR sections 982.404(a) requires owners to maintain units in accordance with HQS. If an owner fails to maintain a dwelling in accordance with HQS and fails to correct the HQS deficiencies within the correction period, the PHA should abate HAP or terminate the contract. Effect As the City verified correction of HQS deficiencies after the correction period, HAP in the amount of $12,222 was improperly disbursed in the year ended June 30, 2022 resulting in questioned costs. Cause Although the City has policies and procedures in place to ensure proper HQS enforcement, there was a lack of diligence in complying with the policies and procedures due to staffing shortages. Recommendation We recommend the City be more diligent in following its policies and procedures for tracking, documenting and performing HQS inspections and taking appropriate action timely when an owner fails to correct HQS deficiencies identified.
Condition During our audit, we examined six haphazardly selected subrecipient monitoring reports and identified one subrecipient for which the financial review portion of their subrecipient monitoring was not performed timely. Criteria 2 CFR 92.504(d) requires a financial review to be performed at least annually for rental projects with 10 or more units. Effect Failure to perform reviews timely may result in subrecipients misusing or mismanaging program funds. Cause Due to significant staffing turnover and COVID 19 pandemic restrictions, the City was unable to perform timely reviews and complete the monitoring reports. Recommendation Management should create policies and procedures to ensure required monitoring procedures are performed and completed timely.
Condition During our audit, we examined 25 haphazardly selected failed Housing Quality Standards (?HQS?) inspections to test if corrections and verifications of corrections were performed within the correction period and proper action taken by the Public Housing Agency (?PHA?). We identified for one owner, verification of correction was performed after the correction period, but no housing assistance payments (?HAP?) were abated. Criteria 24 CFR 92.252(a) provides certain rental assistance limitations that apply to the rent plus the tenant?s utility allowance. The maximum rent is the lesser of 1) the fair market rent for existing housing for comparable units in the area as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (?HUD?) under 24 CFR 888.111; or 2) a rent that does not exceed 30% of the adjusted income of a family whose annual income equals 65% of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for number of bedrooms in the unit. The HOME rent limits provided by HUD include average occupancy per unit and adjusted income assumptions. 24 CFR sections 982.404(a) requires owners to maintain units in accordance with HQS. If an owner fails to maintain a dwelling in accordance with HQS and fails to correct the HQS deficiencies within the correction period, the PHA should abate HAP or terminate the contract. Effect As the City verified correction of HQS deficiencies after the correction period, HAP in the amount of $12,222 was improperly disbursed in the year ended June 30, 2022 resulting in questioned costs. Cause Although the City has policies and procedures in place to ensure proper HQS enforcement, there was a lack of diligence in complying with the policies and procedures due to staffing shortages. Recommendation We recommend the City be more diligent in following its policies and procedures for tracking, documenting and performing HQS inspections and taking appropriate action timely when an owner fails to correct HQS deficiencies identified.
Condition During our audit, we examined 25 haphazardly selected failed Housing Quality Standards (?HQS?) inspections to test if corrections and verifications of corrections were performed within the correction period and proper action taken by the Public Housing Agency (?PHA?). We identified for one owner, verification of correction was performed after the correction period, but no housing assistance payments (?HAP?) were abated. Criteria 24 CFR 92.252(a) provides certain rental assistance limitations that apply to the rent plus the tenant?s utility allowance. The maximum rent is the lesser of 1) the fair market rent for existing housing for comparable units in the area as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (?HUD?) under 24 CFR 888.111; or 2) a rent that does not exceed 30% of the adjusted income of a family whose annual income equals 65% of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for number of bedrooms in the unit. The HOME rent limits provided by HUD include average occupancy per unit and adjusted income assumptions. 24 CFR sections 982.404(a) requires owners to maintain units in accordance with HQS. If an owner fails to maintain a dwelling in accordance with HQS and fails to correct the HQS deficiencies within the correction period, the PHA should abate HAP or terminate the contract. Effect As the City verified correction of HQS deficiencies after the correction period, HAP in the amount of $12,222 was improperly disbursed in the year ended June 30, 2022 resulting in questioned costs. Cause Although the City has policies and procedures in place to ensure proper HQS enforcement, there was a lack of diligence in complying with the policies and procedures due to staffing shortages. Recommendation We recommend the City be more diligent in following its policies and procedures for tracking, documenting and performing HQS inspections and taking appropriate action timely when an owner fails to correct HQS deficiencies identified.
Condition During our audit, we examined 25 haphazardly selected failed Housing Quality Standards (?HQS?) inspections to test if corrections and verifications of corrections were performed within the correction period and proper action taken by the Public Housing Agency (?PHA?). We identified for one owner, verification of correction was performed after the correction period, but no housing assistance payments (?HAP?) were abated. Criteria 24 CFR 92.252(a) provides certain rental assistance limitations that apply to the rent plus the tenant?s utility allowance. The maximum rent is the lesser of 1) the fair market rent for existing housing for comparable units in the area as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (?HUD?) under 24 CFR 888.111; or 2) a rent that does not exceed 30% of the adjusted income of a family whose annual income equals 65% of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for number of bedrooms in the unit. The HOME rent limits provided by HUD include average occupancy per unit and adjusted income assumptions. 24 CFR sections 982.404(a) requires owners to maintain units in accordance with HQS. If an owner fails to maintain a dwelling in accordance with HQS and fails to correct the HQS deficiencies within the correction period, the PHA should abate HAP or terminate the contract. Effect As the City verified correction of HQS deficiencies after the correction period, HAP in the amount of $12,222 was improperly disbursed in the year ended June 30, 2022 resulting in questioned costs. Cause Although the City has policies and procedures in place to ensure proper HQS enforcement, there was a lack of diligence in complying with the policies and procedures due to staffing shortages. Recommendation We recommend the City be more diligent in following its policies and procedures for tracking, documenting and performing HQS inspections and taking appropriate action timely when an owner fails to correct HQS deficiencies identified.
Condition During our audit, we examined 25 haphazardly selected failed Housing Quality Standards (?HQS?) inspections to test if corrections and verifications of corrections were performed within the correction period and proper action taken by the Public Housing Agency (?PHA?). We identified for one owner, verification of correction was performed after the correction period, but no housing assistance payments (?HAP?) were abated. Criteria 24 CFR 92.252(a) provides certain rental assistance limitations that apply to the rent plus the tenant?s utility allowance. The maximum rent is the lesser of 1) the fair market rent for existing housing for comparable units in the area as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (?HUD?) under 24 CFR 888.111; or 2) a rent that does not exceed 30% of the adjusted income of a family whose annual income equals 65% of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for number of bedrooms in the unit. The HOME rent limits provided by HUD include average occupancy per unit and adjusted income assumptions. 24 CFR sections 982.404(a) requires owners to maintain units in accordance with HQS. If an owner fails to maintain a dwelling in accordance with HQS and fails to correct the HQS deficiencies within the correction period, the PHA should abate HAP or terminate the contract. Effect As the City verified correction of HQS deficiencies after the correction period, HAP in the amount of $12,222 was improperly disbursed in the year ended June 30, 2022 resulting in questioned costs. Cause Although the City has policies and procedures in place to ensure proper HQS enforcement, there was a lack of diligence in complying with the policies and procedures due to staffing shortages. Recommendation We recommend the City be more diligent in following its policies and procedures for tracking, documenting and performing HQS inspections and taking appropriate action timely when an owner fails to correct HQS deficiencies identified.