Audit 17744

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$1.14M
Findings
14
Programs
9
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-04-09
Auditor: Wade Stables PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
12825 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
12826 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
12827 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
12828 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
12829 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
12830 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
12831 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
589267 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
589268 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
589269 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
589270 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
589271 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
589272 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B
589273 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes B

Contacts

Name Title Type
C1BBXQ1YX615 Michael Drew Auditee
2172237904 Anita Failor Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Noncash Assistance and Federal Insurance Accounting Policies: Basis of Presentation The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federalaward transactions of West Central Illinois Area Agency on Aging recorded on the modified cash basis ofaccounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Codeof Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirementsfor Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ fromamounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate. The Agency did not receive any federal noncash assistance and had no federal insurance in effect during the year ended September 30, 2022.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding 2022-001 ? Controls over Grant Reporting and Monitoring (Repeat Finding) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entity: Illinois Department on Aging Federal Program: Aging Cluster (Federal Assistance Listing No.?s 93.044, 93.045, 93.053) Requirement: Allowable Costs and Reporting Criteria: To ensure the correctness and completeness of the various required grant reporting performed by the Agency, it is critical to have a process in place to regularly reconcile underlying financial records with the grant reports and ensure the underlying costs in the financial records can be supported. It is also imperative to have monitoring procedures in place to ensure compliance to all grant requirements. Condition: During the course of our audit, we noted that the Agency is not performing regular reconciliations between the general ledger and the grant reports. Management is using several worksheets to determine the grant report amounts, and it is evident that the Agency is allotting adequate time to prepare the grant reporting. However, we were not able to determine that the Agency is reconciling the reported amounts to the underlying financial documentation on a regular or cumulative basis. Additionally, it was observed that personnel activity reports were not completed for all employees as required by certain grant agreements. We also noted that no compliance review is being performed to ensure adherence to all grant requirements. Cause: There is currently no reconciliation process being maintained for each of the various grant sources. The Agency continues to improve in this area from the prior years, however, a formal reconciliation is not being performed. Regarding personnel activity reports, supporting documentation is not available for all employees? actual time spent and charged to the grants. We also were not able to obtain any monitoring documentation indicating that a formal process has been developed to ensure grant compliance. Effect: Without timely reconciliations, personnel activity reports, and monitoring processes, grant expenditures can be omitted or overstated on the submitted grant reporting and other grant noncompliance could be overlooked. This could result in missed funding or noncompliance with the grant agreement which could lead to adverse conditions with the grantor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency develop written procedures that require all grant reports are reconciled to the internal accounting records prior to submission. This reconciliation should be presented in a clear and concise manner to enable another party to review and approve before ultimately submitted it to the grantor. This should be attainable as each grant is coded separately. Additionally, we recommend the Agency implement that all employees submit personnel activity reports to provide documentation of their time that is reimbursed by each grant. We also recommend that the Agency require a periodic review of the adherence to the various grant compliance requirements and note such a review was performed. Response: The board and management continue to gain a better understanding of the grant reconciliation process. A procedure is intended to be put in place to reconcile grant reports to the general ledger, Procedures to implement the collection of employee activity reports and periodic reviews with the board showing grant funds used compared to grant funds requested from the grantor. See Corrective Action Plan.