Audit 17708

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$863,234
Findings
76
Programs
11
Organization: Hot Springs County (WY)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-02-22

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
12727 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12728 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12729 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12730 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12731 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12732 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12733 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12734 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12735 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12736 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12737 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12738 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12739 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12740 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12741 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12742 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12743 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12744 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12745 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12746 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12747 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12748 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12749 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12750 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12751 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12752 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12753 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12754 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12755 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12756 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12757 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12758 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12759 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12760 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12761 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12762 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12763 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
12764 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589169 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589170 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589171 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589172 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589173 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589174 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589175 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589176 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589177 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589178 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589179 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589180 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589181 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589182 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589183 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589184 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589185 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589186 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589187 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589188 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589189 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589190 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589191 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589192 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589193 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589194 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589195 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589196 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589197 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589198 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589199 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589200 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589201 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589202 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589203 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589204 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589205 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes P
589206 2022-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P

Contacts

Name Title Type
FLFTXFKWR3J5 Becky Kersten Auditee
3078643515 Jason Lund Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the accrual basis of accounting with modification for disbursements under the cash basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the SEFA represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria An effective internal control structure of an entity will include policies and procedures to: 1. Protect its assets against theft and waste. 2. Ensure compliance with the entity?s policies, procedures, and statutory requirements. 3. Evaluate the performance of personnel to promote efficient operations. 4. Ensure accurate and reliable operating and accounting data. Segregation of duties is a basic, key internal control and often difficult to achieve, especially in a small organization. The concept is that one individual should not be able to handle or dominate transactions for initiation to posting in the general ledger with access to assets and accounting records. Condition The County has a limited number of accounting personnel and accordingly a proper segregation of duties does not exist. Cause Due to the size of the County, as measured by the scope, volume and complexity of the entity?s activities and financial transactions, it is not practical to employ sufficient staff to maintain an adequate segregation of duties at all times. Effect or Potential Effect The potential effect is an increase in the risk of fraud and undetected errors in the processing of financial transactions and material noncompliance with requirements of federal programs. Recommendation We recognize that that is impractical for the entity to employ sufficient staff to achieve complete segregation of duties over all transactions at all times. However, we feel the County Commissioners should be aware of this deficiency in internal control. The County Commissioners should formulate and follow oversight policies and procedures to mitigate the risk of the lack of segregation of duties. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.
Criteria 2 CFR 200.303 requires that the entity establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Nonfederal entities are required to have certain written policies and procedures surrounding the management of their federal award funding. 2 CFR 200.302 Financial Management, Uniform Guidance require that entities receiving Federal Awards have written policies, ensuring procedures are in place for approval, budget, asset protection and training employees. Condition The County has not adopted policies and procedures to ensure that required internal controls for reporting are in place and operating sufficiently to ensure compliance with Uniform guidance. Questioned Costs None Cause As this is a repeat finding, the County was aware of the requirements, however, they are currently in the process of creating written policies and procedures pursuant to the Uniform Guidance. Effect or Potential Effect The County could be in violation with State and Federal regulations governing Federal awards. Recommendation We recommend that the County continue to work on creating policies and procedures and complete the process in a timely manner. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions See the following page(s) for the County?s response to this finding.