Audit 17300

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$1.86M
Findings
2
Programs
1
Organization: Capital Caring Health (VA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
12586 2022-001 Material Weakness - A
589028 2022-001 Material Weakness - A

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $1.86M Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
JJV3MMVT9EJ8 Joe Murray Auditee
7035311108 Jaime Rapps Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Consolidated Group did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Capital Caring Health and Related Entities (the Consolidated Group) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Consolidated Group, it is not intended to and does not present the consolidated financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Consolidated Group.
Title: subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Consolidated Group did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. There were no payments made to subrecipients for federal awards received during the year ended December 31, 2022.

Finding Details

AL 97.036 - COVID-19 Disaster Grant-Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Criteria: The Consolidated Group reported duplicative costs in its FEMA grant submission for reimbursement. Condition: The Consolidated Group?s grant submission for reimbursement included duplicate invoices resulting in unallowable. Cause: There was a miscommunication between two individuals responsible for FEMA grant submission for reimbursement, which resulted in the duplicative costs being used. Effect: The Consolidated Group was not in compliance with FEMA grant requirements. Questioned Cost: $355,481. PerspectiveInformation: The Consolidated Group utilized duplicate expenses totaling $355,481 as part of its request for reimbursement. The initial grant submission for reimbursement was $2,213,396. Identification of Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management modify their processes and procedures surrounding grant submissions for reimbursement to ensure that the same expense is not used as the basis for multiple grant submissions. Views of Responsible Officials: See Auditee?s Corrective Action
AL 97.036 - COVID-19 Disaster Grant-Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) Criteria: The Consolidated Group reported duplicative costs in its FEMA grant submission for reimbursement. Condition: The Consolidated Group?s grant submission for reimbursement included duplicate invoices resulting in unallowable. Cause: There was a miscommunication between two individuals responsible for FEMA grant submission for reimbursement, which resulted in the duplicative costs being used. Effect: The Consolidated Group was not in compliance with FEMA grant requirements. Questioned Cost: $355,481. PerspectiveInformation: The Consolidated Group utilized duplicate expenses totaling $355,481 as part of its request for reimbursement. The initial grant submission for reimbursement was $2,213,396. Identification of Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that management modify their processes and procedures surrounding grant submissions for reimbursement to ensure that the same expense is not used as the basis for multiple grant submissions. Views of Responsible Officials: See Auditee?s Corrective Action