Notes to SEFA
Title: Note 3: Subrecipients
Accounting Policies: Presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles using the modified accrual basis of accounting.
De Minimis Rate Used: N
Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.
No amounts ($0) were passed-through to subrecipients.
Title: Note 4: Pass-through Information
Accounting Policies: Presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles using the modified accrual basis of accounting.
De Minimis Rate Used: N
Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.
Information not available.
Title: Note 5: Cluster Totals
Accounting Policies: Presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles using the modified accrual basis of accounting.
De Minimis Rate Used: N
Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.
Total for Nutrition Cluster is $9,025,956; Total for Highway Safety Cluster is $55,966; Total for Special Education Cluster is $3,028,509.
Title: Note 6: Pass-through Entity Identifying Number Totals
Accounting Policies: Presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles using the modified accrual basis of accounting.
De Minimis Rate Used: N
Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.
Z21THS184 $29,517; Z22THS181 $26,449.
Title: Note 7: Federal Assistance Listing (FAL) Totals
Accounting Policies: Presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles using the modified accrual basis of accounting.
De Minimis Rate Used: N
Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.
Total for FAL No. 10.555 is $7,126,955; Total for FAL No. 16.034 is $140,704; Total for FAL No. 84.027 is $2,964,995; Total for FAL No. 84.173 is $63,514; Total for FAL No. 84.425 is $11,420,377.
Title: Note 8: Consolidated Administration
Accounting Policies: Presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles using the modified accrual basis of accounting.
De Minimis Rate Used: N
Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.
See the table in the notes to the SEFA for amounts consolidated for administration purposes.