Audit 16498

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$24.52M
Findings
4
Programs
43
Organization: Alamance County, North Carolina (NC)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-01-16

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
12248 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes E
12249 2022-003 Material Weakness - E
588690 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes E
588691 2022-003 Material Weakness - E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $7.56M Yes 0
93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (elc) $1.41M Yes 0
10.557 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children $738,490 Yes 2
93.658 Foster Care_title IV-E $366,383 - 0
93.596 Child Care Mandatory and Matching Funds of the Child Care and Development Fund $332,127 - 0
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $249,832 - 0
16.575 Crime Victim Assistance $248,090 - 0
93.568 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance $227,983 - 0
16.710 Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants $148,354 - 0
93.994 Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant to the States $147,280 - 0
16.528 Enhanced Training and Services to End Violence and Abuse of Women Later in Life $139,613 - 0
93.674 John H. Chafee Foster Care Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood $109,984 - 0
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $109,228 - 0
93.136 Injury Prevention and Control Research and State and Community Based Programs $108,802 - 0
93.217 Family Planning_services $95,517 - 0
16.745 Criminal and Juvenile Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program $88,918 - 0
93.053 Nutrition Services Incentive Program $74,421 - 0
93.045 Special Programs for the Aging_title Iii, Part C_nutrition Services $73,395 - 0
16.034 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program $58,008 - 0
93.052 National Family Caregiver Support, Title Iii, Part E $54,145 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $53,991 Yes 0
93.767 Children's Health Insurance Program $53,941 - 0
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $52,264 - 0
93.645 Stephanie Tubbs Jones Child Welfare Services Program $44,579 - 0
45.310 Grants to States $43,522 - 0
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $41,506 - 0
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $40,250 - 0
93.391 Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (stlt) Health Department Response to Public Health Or Healthcare Crises $34,082 - 0
93.991 Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant $30,607 - 0
93.498 Provider Relief Fund $28,932 - 0
93.556 Promoting Safe and Stable Families $23,250 - 0
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $17,146 - 0
93.667 Social Services Block Grant $16,285 - 0
21.016 Equitable Sharing $13,830 - 0
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $12,695 - 0
93.659 Adoption Assistance $11,743 - 0
20.703 Interagency Hazardous Materials Public Sector Training and Planning Grants $10,000 - 0
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $6,372 - 0
93.044 Special Programs for the Aging_title Iii, Part B_grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers $5,666 - 0
21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund $2,125 - 0
93.977 Preventive Health Services_sexually Transmitted Diseases Control Grants $100 - 0
93.116 Project Grants and Cooperative Agreements for Tuberculosis Control Programs $50 - 0
93.563 Child Support Enforcement $11 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
F5VHYUU13NC5 Susan Evans Auditee
3365704026 Erica Brown Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursements. Alamance County has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards (SEFSA) includes the federal and state grant activity of Alamance County under the programs of the federal government and the State of North Carolina for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in this SEFSA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards and the State Single Audit Implementation Act. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Alamance County, it is not intended to and does not present the net position, changes in net position or cash flows of Alamance County.
Title: Cluster of Programs Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursements. Alamance County has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The following are clustered by the NC Department of Health and Human Services and are treated separately for state audit requirement purposes: Subsidized Child Care, Foster Care Adoption and Guardianship Assistance Cluster and Special Children Adoption Fund.

Finding Details

US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the N.C. Dept. of Health and Human Services Program Name: (WIC) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children AL # 10.557 Grant Number: 403 13A2 5403 Finding: 2022-002 MATERIAL WEAKNESS Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to properly review and assess the eligibility of individuals to ensure the accuracy of the benefits being provided is within program requirements. Verification of accuracy of information used in determining eligibility should be performed by management. Evidence of the review should be documented and include authorized signatures. Condition: The County Health Department did not have adequate review controls in place to ensure the proper eligibility determinations were being made and documented. The County did not have evidence of reviews performed over the program tested for the entire period under audit. Context: The County did not have evidence of reviews performed over the program for the entire period under audit. Effect: Casefiles could be missing the required eligibility determination documentation which would allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: Weakness in implementation of controls over second party review procedures performed by management. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is a repeated finding from the immediate previous audit, 2021-001. Recommendation: Evidence of documentation of reviews should be retained and include electronic signatures of reviewer. Any deficiencies noted during the review should be corrected within a timely manner and documented as such. Name of Contact Person: Nicole Alston Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan.
US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the N.C. Dept. of Health and Human Services Program Name: (WIC) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children AL # 10.557 Grant Number: 403 13A2 5403 Finding: 2022-003 NON-MATERIAL NON-COMPLIANCE MATERIAL WEAKNESS Criteria: In accordance with 7 CFR 246, benefits should be terminated timely to prevent payment errors. In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that benefits are paid only through the proper certification period. Condition: One casefile certification was not set for the proper period. As a result, benefits continued for six months after they should have terminated. Context: Of the 89,500 benefit payments valued at $4,833,494, we examined 60 payment records ($2,436 value) and determined that one (2% valued at $369) of the participants received benefits after the proper certification period. Effect: Certification periods not being through the proper period could cause the County to expend funds over the eligible amount. Cause: The caseworker did not review to ensure that the certification period was proper. Questioned Costs: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, auditors are required to report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000. Even though the sample results only identified $369 (federal share $369 and state share $0) in questioned costs, if tests were extended to the entire population, questioned costs could exceed $25,000. Recommendation: Caseworkers should review cases to ensure that certification periods are through the proper period. Name of Contact Person: Nicole Alston Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan.
US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the N.C. Dept. of Health and Human Services Program Name: (WIC) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children AL # 10.557 Grant Number: 403 13A2 5403 Finding: 2022-002 MATERIAL WEAKNESS Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to properly review and assess the eligibility of individuals to ensure the accuracy of the benefits being provided is within program requirements. Verification of accuracy of information used in determining eligibility should be performed by management. Evidence of the review should be documented and include authorized signatures. Condition: The County Health Department did not have adequate review controls in place to ensure the proper eligibility determinations were being made and documented. The County did not have evidence of reviews performed over the program tested for the entire period under audit. Context: The County did not have evidence of reviews performed over the program for the entire period under audit. Effect: Casefiles could be missing the required eligibility determination documentation which would allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: Weakness in implementation of controls over second party review procedures performed by management. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is a repeated finding from the immediate previous audit, 2021-001. Recommendation: Evidence of documentation of reviews should be retained and include electronic signatures of reviewer. Any deficiencies noted during the review should be corrected within a timely manner and documented as such. Name of Contact Person: Nicole Alston Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan.
US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the N.C. Dept. of Health and Human Services Program Name: (WIC) Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children AL # 10.557 Grant Number: 403 13A2 5403 Finding: 2022-003 NON-MATERIAL NON-COMPLIANCE MATERIAL WEAKNESS Criteria: In accordance with 7 CFR 246, benefits should be terminated timely to prevent payment errors. In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that benefits are paid only through the proper certification period. Condition: One casefile certification was not set for the proper period. As a result, benefits continued for six months after they should have terminated. Context: Of the 89,500 benefit payments valued at $4,833,494, we examined 60 payment records ($2,436 value) and determined that one (2% valued at $369) of the participants received benefits after the proper certification period. Effect: Certification periods not being through the proper period could cause the County to expend funds over the eligible amount. Cause: The caseworker did not review to ensure that the certification period was proper. Questioned Costs: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, auditors are required to report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000. Even though the sample results only identified $369 (federal share $369 and state share $0) in questioned costs, if tests were extended to the entire population, questioned costs could exceed $25,000. Recommendation: Caseworkers should review cases to ensure that certification periods are through the proper period. Name of Contact Person: Nicole Alston Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan.