Audit 15780

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$6.20M
Findings
6
Programs
5
Organization: Sabine Parish Police Jury (LA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-02-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
11887 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes M
11888 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes M
11889 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes M
588329 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes M
588330 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes M
588331 2022-002 Material Weakness Yes M

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund $4.64M Yes 0
17.258 Wia Adult Program $622,381 Yes 1
17.278 Wia Dislocated Workers $535,244 Yes 1
17.259 Wia Youth Activities $394,118 Yes 1
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $13,354 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
U54XMBNNLBJ1 Bill Weatherford Auditee
3182565637 Lee Willis Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The schedule of expenditures of federal awards was prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. See Note 1 of the accompanying financial statements for further details. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Sabine Parish Police Jury has not used the 10% de minims indirect cost rate.

Finding Details

Sub Recipient Monitoring: 1) Condition - The entire amount received from the Department of Labor is passed through to a subrecipient that is responsible for providing the program services. Management has not engaged in any activities associated with monitoring the subrecipient's operations. 2) Criteria - Compliance requirements published by the Office of Management and Budget mandate monitoring of subrecipients. 3) Cause - The sub recipient has exercised sole responsibility for all operations of the program and the Police Jury has not engaged in any oversight. 4) Effect - Failure to meet compliance requirements and failure to establish appropriate internal controls over compliance. 5) Recommendation - The Police Jury has discontinued participation in the program and funding is currently collected by the Police Jury’s successor. Accordingly, no recommendations are necessary.
Sub Recipient Monitoring: 1) Condition - The entire amount received from the Department of Labor is passed through to a subrecipient that is responsible for providing the program services. Management has not engaged in any activities associated with monitoring the subrecipient's operations. 2) Criteria - Compliance requirements published by the Office of Management and Budget mandate monitoring of subrecipients. 3) Cause - The sub recipient has exercised sole responsibility for all operations of the program and the Police Jury has not engaged in any oversight. 4) Effect - Failure to meet compliance requirements and failure to establish appropriate internal controls over compliance. 5) Recommendation - The Police Jury has discontinued participation in the program and funding is currently collected by the Police Jury’s successor. Accordingly, no recommendations are necessary.
Sub Recipient Monitoring: 1) Condition - The entire amount received from the Department of Labor is passed through to a subrecipient that is responsible for providing the program services. Management has not engaged in any activities associated with monitoring the subrecipient's operations. 2) Criteria - Compliance requirements published by the Office of Management and Budget mandate monitoring of subrecipients. 3) Cause - The sub recipient has exercised sole responsibility for all operations of the program and the Police Jury has not engaged in any oversight. 4) Effect - Failure to meet compliance requirements and failure to establish appropriate internal controls over compliance. 5) Recommendation - The Police Jury has discontinued participation in the program and funding is currently collected by the Police Jury’s successor. Accordingly, no recommendations are necessary.
Sub Recipient Monitoring: 1) Condition - The entire amount received from the Department of Labor is passed through to a subrecipient that is responsible for providing the program services. Management has not engaged in any activities associated with monitoring the subrecipient's operations. 2) Criteria - Compliance requirements published by the Office of Management and Budget mandate monitoring of subrecipients. 3) Cause - The sub recipient has exercised sole responsibility for all operations of the program and the Police Jury has not engaged in any oversight. 4) Effect - Failure to meet compliance requirements and failure to establish appropriate internal controls over compliance. 5) Recommendation - The Police Jury has discontinued participation in the program and funding is currently collected by the Police Jury’s successor. Accordingly, no recommendations are necessary.
Sub Recipient Monitoring: 1) Condition - The entire amount received from the Department of Labor is passed through to a subrecipient that is responsible for providing the program services. Management has not engaged in any activities associated with monitoring the subrecipient's operations. 2) Criteria - Compliance requirements published by the Office of Management and Budget mandate monitoring of subrecipients. 3) Cause - The sub recipient has exercised sole responsibility for all operations of the program and the Police Jury has not engaged in any oversight. 4) Effect - Failure to meet compliance requirements and failure to establish appropriate internal controls over compliance. 5) Recommendation - The Police Jury has discontinued participation in the program and funding is currently collected by the Police Jury’s successor. Accordingly, no recommendations are necessary.
Sub Recipient Monitoring: 1) Condition - The entire amount received from the Department of Labor is passed through to a subrecipient that is responsible for providing the program services. Management has not engaged in any activities associated with monitoring the subrecipient's operations. 2) Criteria - Compliance requirements published by the Office of Management and Budget mandate monitoring of subrecipients. 3) Cause - The sub recipient has exercised sole responsibility for all operations of the program and the Police Jury has not engaged in any oversight. 4) Effect - Failure to meet compliance requirements and failure to establish appropriate internal controls over compliance. 5) Recommendation - The Police Jury has discontinued participation in the program and funding is currently collected by the Police Jury’s successor. Accordingly, no recommendations are necessary.