Audit 14412

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$1.27M
Findings
6
Programs
13
Organization: Town of Woodbridge (CT)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-01-30
Auditor: Rsm US LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
10693 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
10694 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
10695 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
587135 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
587136 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
587137 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
UU2NFPVMEKW8 Anthony Genovese Auditee
2033893482 Lauren Teran Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Town has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate provided under Section 200.414 of the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of the Town of Woodbridge, Connecticut (the Town), under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Town, it is not intended to, and does not present the financial position, changes in fund balance, changes in net position or cash flows of the Town.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Principals Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Town has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate provided under Section 200.414 of the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Town has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate provided under Section 200.414 of the Uniform Guidance. The Town currently does not have any grants which require the application of an overhead rate, however, if they did, the Town would elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Town has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate provided under Section 200.414 of the Uniform Guidance. The Town did not provide any federal funds to subrecipients for the year ended June 30, 2023.
Title: Non-Cash Awards Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Town has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate provided under Section 200.414 of the Uniform Guidance. Donated commodities in the amount of $10,967 are included in the Department of Agriculture’s National School Lunch Program, Assistance Listing Number #10.555. The amount represents the market value of commodities received.

Finding Details

Finding 2023-001 - Procurement and Suspension, and Debarment - Internal Control over Verification Against the System for Award Management (“SAM”) Assistance Listing Program Title and Number- Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 Federal Agency- Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity- State Office of Policy and Management, State Department of Education Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, (Uniform Guidance) requires compliance with provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During our audit, we noted that the Town did not have documentation to support that it verified vendors selected for testing against the SAM to ensure that they were not suspended or debarred from federally— funded purchases. Cause: While the Town has a formal policy requiring the purchasing department to perform verification of suspension or debarment over vendors that the Town makes contracts with federally-funded projects, it does not maintain formal documentation that this procedure occurred. Effect: Without documented evidence of verifying whether the Town was followings its policy, the Town could not provide evidence of this control was being completed for federally-funded projects. There were no standard forms or templates that were used to document verification that parties are not suspended or debarred. Questioned Cost: None Context: See condition above for context for the finding. There was no documentation available for 13 out of 13 selections tested. However, none of the vendors selected for testing were suspended or debarred. Repeating Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Town implement a policy to formally document the procedures they are performing. Views of responsible officials of the auditee: The Town agrees with the finding and the recommendation.
Finding 2023-001 - Procurement and Suspension, and Debarment - Internal Control over Verification Against the System for Award Management (“SAM”) Assistance Listing Program Title and Number- Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 Federal Agency- Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity- State Office of Policy and Management, State Department of Education Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, (Uniform Guidance) requires compliance with provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During our audit, we noted that the Town did not have documentation to support that it verified vendors selected for testing against the SAM to ensure that they were not suspended or debarred from federally— funded purchases. Cause: While the Town has a formal policy requiring the purchasing department to perform verification of suspension or debarment over vendors that the Town makes contracts with federally-funded projects, it does not maintain formal documentation that this procedure occurred. Effect: Without documented evidence of verifying whether the Town was followings its policy, the Town could not provide evidence of this control was being completed for federally-funded projects. There were no standard forms or templates that were used to document verification that parties are not suspended or debarred. Questioned Cost: None Context: See condition above for context for the finding. There was no documentation available for 13 out of 13 selections tested. However, none of the vendors selected for testing were suspended or debarred. Repeating Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Town implement a policy to formally document the procedures they are performing. Views of responsible officials of the auditee: The Town agrees with the finding and the recommendation.
Finding 2023-001 - Procurement and Suspension, and Debarment - Internal Control over Verification Against the System for Award Management (“SAM”) Assistance Listing Program Title and Number- Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 Federal Agency- Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity- State Office of Policy and Management, State Department of Education Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, (Uniform Guidance) requires compliance with provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During our audit, we noted that the Town did not have documentation to support that it verified vendors selected for testing against the SAM to ensure that they were not suspended or debarred from federally— funded purchases. Cause: While the Town has a formal policy requiring the purchasing department to perform verification of suspension or debarment over vendors that the Town makes contracts with federally-funded projects, it does not maintain formal documentation that this procedure occurred. Effect: Without documented evidence of verifying whether the Town was followings its policy, the Town could not provide evidence of this control was being completed for federally-funded projects. There were no standard forms or templates that were used to document verification that parties are not suspended or debarred. Questioned Cost: None Context: See condition above for context for the finding. There was no documentation available for 13 out of 13 selections tested. However, none of the vendors selected for testing were suspended or debarred. Repeating Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Town implement a policy to formally document the procedures they are performing. Views of responsible officials of the auditee: The Town agrees with the finding and the recommendation.
Finding 2023-001 - Procurement and Suspension, and Debarment - Internal Control over Verification Against the System for Award Management (“SAM”) Assistance Listing Program Title and Number- Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 Federal Agency- Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity- State Office of Policy and Management, State Department of Education Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, (Uniform Guidance) requires compliance with provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During our audit, we noted that the Town did not have documentation to support that it verified vendors selected for testing against the SAM to ensure that they were not suspended or debarred from federally— funded purchases. Cause: While the Town has a formal policy requiring the purchasing department to perform verification of suspension or debarment over vendors that the Town makes contracts with federally-funded projects, it does not maintain formal documentation that this procedure occurred. Effect: Without documented evidence of verifying whether the Town was followings its policy, the Town could not provide evidence of this control was being completed for federally-funded projects. There were no standard forms or templates that were used to document verification that parties are not suspended or debarred. Questioned Cost: None Context: See condition above for context for the finding. There was no documentation available for 13 out of 13 selections tested. However, none of the vendors selected for testing were suspended or debarred. Repeating Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Town implement a policy to formally document the procedures they are performing. Views of responsible officials of the auditee: The Town agrees with the finding and the recommendation.
Finding 2023-001 - Procurement and Suspension, and Debarment - Internal Control over Verification Against the System for Award Management (“SAM”) Assistance Listing Program Title and Number- Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 Federal Agency- Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity- State Office of Policy and Management, State Department of Education Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, (Uniform Guidance) requires compliance with provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During our audit, we noted that the Town did not have documentation to support that it verified vendors selected for testing against the SAM to ensure that they were not suspended or debarred from federally— funded purchases. Cause: While the Town has a formal policy requiring the purchasing department to perform verification of suspension or debarment over vendors that the Town makes contracts with federally-funded projects, it does not maintain formal documentation that this procedure occurred. Effect: Without documented evidence of verifying whether the Town was followings its policy, the Town could not provide evidence of this control was being completed for federally-funded projects. There were no standard forms or templates that were used to document verification that parties are not suspended or debarred. Questioned Cost: None Context: See condition above for context for the finding. There was no documentation available for 13 out of 13 selections tested. However, none of the vendors selected for testing were suspended or debarred. Repeating Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Town implement a policy to formally document the procedures they are performing. Views of responsible officials of the auditee: The Town agrees with the finding and the recommendation.
Finding 2023-001 - Procurement and Suspension, and Debarment - Internal Control over Verification Against the System for Award Management (“SAM”) Assistance Listing Program Title and Number- Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 Federal Agency- Department of Treasury Pass-through Entity- State Office of Policy and Management, State Department of Education Criteria or specific requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, (Uniform Guidance) requires compliance with provisions of procurement, suspension, and debarment. Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. When a non-federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the nonfederal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: During our audit, we noted that the Town did not have documentation to support that it verified vendors selected for testing against the SAM to ensure that they were not suspended or debarred from federally— funded purchases. Cause: While the Town has a formal policy requiring the purchasing department to perform verification of suspension or debarment over vendors that the Town makes contracts with federally-funded projects, it does not maintain formal documentation that this procedure occurred. Effect: Without documented evidence of verifying whether the Town was followings its policy, the Town could not provide evidence of this control was being completed for federally-funded projects. There were no standard forms or templates that were used to document verification that parties are not suspended or debarred. Questioned Cost: None Context: See condition above for context for the finding. There was no documentation available for 13 out of 13 selections tested. However, none of the vendors selected for testing were suspended or debarred. Repeating Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Town implement a policy to formally document the procedures they are performing. Views of responsible officials of the auditee: The Town agrees with the finding and the recommendation.