Audit 14297

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$875,877
Findings
2
Programs
5
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-01-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
10632 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - I
587074 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
11.999 Marine Debris Program $701,061 Yes 1
15.875 Economic, Social, and Political Development of the Territories $96,850 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $53,798 - 0
11.482 Coral Reef Conservation Program $20,708 - 0
11.452 Monofilament Project II $3,460 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
K9HJF2JME9Q7 Roberta Guerrero Auditee
6702337333 David Burger Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: MINA used the de minimis indirect cost rate (10%) allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Criteria: The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. CNMI Department of Finance Procurement regulations § 70-30.3-225, sole source procurement indicates: for any sole-source procurement pursuant to subsection (a)(1), a written justification for sole-source procurement shall be prepared by the official with expenditure authority and submitted to the Director. This written justification shall contain the specific unique capabilities required; the specific unique capabilities of the contractor; the efforts made to obtain competition; and the specific considerations given to alternative sources and specific reasons why alternative sources were not selected. Condition: For 3 or 100% of the 3 contractors selected for testing, MINA did not properly document their compliance with the sole source procurement regulation. There was no written justification regarding the specific unique capabilities required from the contractors, also the efforts made to obtain competition, and the specific considerations given to alternative sources. Cause: MINA did search for contractors in the CNMI and made their determination that there were no alternative sources, but they did not document these procedures. Effect: The possibility exists that the Organization may not have obtained the best combination of service and cost. Recommendation: MINA should establish, monitor and follow the existing procurement regulations, or develop its own procurement regulations that will be in accordance with local laws and regulations. MINA should ensure that required written documentation evidencing compliance is prepared and maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: MINA has agreed with the finding. See the details at the corrective action plan.
Criteria: The non-Federal entity must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with State, local, and tribal laws and regulations and the standards of this section, for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award or subaward. CNMI Department of Finance Procurement regulations § 70-30.3-225, sole source procurement indicates: for any sole-source procurement pursuant to subsection (a)(1), a written justification for sole-source procurement shall be prepared by the official with expenditure authority and submitted to the Director. This written justification shall contain the specific unique capabilities required; the specific unique capabilities of the contractor; the efforts made to obtain competition; and the specific considerations given to alternative sources and specific reasons why alternative sources were not selected. Condition: For 3 or 100% of the 3 contractors selected for testing, MINA did not properly document their compliance with the sole source procurement regulation. There was no written justification regarding the specific unique capabilities required from the contractors, also the efforts made to obtain competition, and the specific considerations given to alternative sources. Cause: MINA did search for contractors in the CNMI and made their determination that there were no alternative sources, but they did not document these procedures. Effect: The possibility exists that the Organization may not have obtained the best combination of service and cost. Recommendation: MINA should establish, monitor and follow the existing procurement regulations, or develop its own procurement regulations that will be in accordance with local laws and regulations. MINA should ensure that required written documentation evidencing compliance is prepared and maintained. Views of Responsible Officials: MINA has agreed with the finding. See the details at the corrective action plan.