Audit 14128

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$15.72M
Findings
12
Programs
17
Organization: Franklin Parish School Board (LA)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-01-29
Auditor: Eisneramper LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
10465 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
10466 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - I
10467 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - I
10468 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - I
10469 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - I
10470 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
586907 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
586908 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - I
586909 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - I
586910 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - I
586911 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - I
586912 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
XMZ8SEL3UB24 Ellen Lane Auditee
3184359046 Freddy Smith Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: FOOD DISTRIBUTION Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) includes the federal grant activity of Franklin Parish School Board and is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: During the year ended June 30, 2023, the Franklin Parish School Board did not elect to use the 10% de minimus cost rate as covered in §200.414 of the Uniform Guidance. Instead, the School Board has an indirect cost rate that is provided by the Louisiana Department of Education. Nonmonetary assistance is reported in the schedule at the fair market value of the commodities received and disbursed. During the year ended June 30, 2023, the School Board received commodities valued at $190,033. At June 30, 2023, the School Board had food commodities totaling $21,459 in inventory.
Title: RECONCILIATION TO THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENT Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) includes the federal grant activity of Franklin Parish School Board and is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: During the year ended June 30, 2023, the Franklin Parish School Board did not elect to use the 10% de minimus cost rate as covered in §200.414 of the Uniform Guidance. Instead, the School Board has an indirect cost rate that is provided by the Louisiana Department of Education. The federal expenditures reported on the SEFA of $15,724,623 are reported within the financial statements as evidenced through federal revenues reimbursing the expenditures reported in the following funds of the School Board’s Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance.

Finding Details

Criteria: Contracts and subcontracts involving construction activity with federal funds are subject to the Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. As such, the School Board, as a subgrantee to the State of LA, must monitor its construction contractors through review of payrolls for payment of Davis Bacon Act prevailing wage requirements. Condition: The School Board conducted construction activities with the ESSER funds, including roofing, window replacements, and other, but did not monitor its contractors’ compliance with Davis Bacon wage requirements. Universe/ Population: Approximately $345,000 was spent on construction type activities that under projects that would have required monitoring. None of the contractors performing the activity were monitored. Effect: The School Board is non-compliant with the requirements to monitor its subrecipients with respect to Davis-Bacon compliance. Cause: Construction activities are rarely conducted with educationally related federal grants and the administration was unfamiliar with the requirements. Recommendation: The School Board should be wary of all grant requirements prior to acceptance of the grant award. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: The Federal Programs Director acknowledges that we were not compliant with the Davis-Bacon requirement concerning prevailing wages. This project was completed early in the process of receiving ESSER funding and we were unaware of the Davis-Bacon wage requirements. Moving forward, the Federal Programs department and the Business department will work together to ensure that all Davis-Bacon requirements are met.
Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 (the Uniform Guidance) and use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Internal controls should be designed to ensure compliance with these federal requirements.Additionally, contracts involving federal funds must include certain provisions of Appendix II part 200. Condition: The Child Nutrition Program is administered for the School Board by the CNP department. The Department’s purchase of produce products was not subjected to bidding or other means of competitive solicitation in accordance with the Unform Guidance. Additionally, the contracts with vendors do not include the provisions contained in Appendix II part 200. Universe/ Population: Food purchases subject to the procurement regulations totaled approximately $1,000,000, among 5 vendors, of which 4 contracts totaling $800,000 were subject to audit. Of the 4 audited, 1 contract with purchases totaling $120,000 for the fiscal year was found to be non-compliant. Effect: The School Board may be non-compliant with the Uniform Guidance with respect to this contract for produce products. Cause: A shortage of suppliers in the geographic area may have led to the decision to forego the pricing and/or bidding process. Recommendation: Pricing, bidding or other forms of solicitation allowed by the Uniform Guidance should be conducted by the School Board’s Child Nutrition Department. Contracts should be standardized to include the language and provisions of Appendix II part 200. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan: The Child Nutrition Supervisor acknowledges the finding regarding the purchase of produce products for SY 2022-23. There is only one regional produce distributor that successfully delivers to the Franklin Parish area with accurate invoices and timely deliveries based on past history. Due to staff changes and re-assignment of essential job functions, the produce bid was overlooked for this this year only. Moving forward, the CNP Supervisor bas established a procurement schedule for developing and revising necessary formal bids in compliance with Federal and State requirements and all CNP central office staff. During SY 2022-23, the Franklin Parish Child Nutrition Program experienced multiple shortages of canned and frozen vegetables and fruits. This made it essential to fill in with fresh produce to meet meal pattern requirements. This created a marked increase in the cost of the fresh produce available to us and increased our reliance on fresh produce.
Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 (the Uniform Guidance) and use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Internal controls should be designed to ensure compliance with these federal requirements.Additionally, contracts involving federal funds must include certain provisions of Appendix II part 200. Condition: The Child Nutrition Program is administered for the School Board by the CNP department. The Department’s purchase of produce products was not subjected to bidding or other means of competitive solicitation in accordance with the Unform Guidance. Additionally, the contracts with vendors do not include the provisions contained in Appendix II part 200. Universe/ Population: Food purchases subject to the procurement regulations totaled approximately $1,000,000, among 5 vendors, of which 4 contracts totaling $800,000 were subject to audit. Of the 4 audited, 1 contract with purchases totaling $120,000 for the fiscal year was found to be non-compliant. Effect: The School Board may be non-compliant with the Uniform Guidance with respect to this contract for produce products. Cause: A shortage of suppliers in the geographic area may have led to the decision to forego the pricing and/or bidding process. Recommendation: Pricing, bidding or other forms of solicitation allowed by the Uniform Guidance should be conducted by the School Board’s Child Nutrition Department. Contracts should be standardized to include the language and provisions of Appendix II part 200. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan: The Child Nutrition Supervisor acknowledges the finding regarding the purchase of produce products for SY 2022-23. There is only one regional produce distributor that successfully delivers to the Franklin Parish area with accurate invoices and timely deliveries based on past history. Due to staff changes and re-assignment of essential job functions, the produce bid was overlooked for this this year only. Moving forward, the CNP Supervisor bas established a procurement schedule for developing and revising necessary formal bids in compliance with Federal and State requirements and all CNP central office staff. During SY 2022-23, the Franklin Parish Child Nutrition Program experienced multiple shortages of canned and frozen vegetables and fruits. This made it essential to fill in with fresh produce to meet meal pattern requirements. This created a marked increase in the cost of the fresh produce available to us and increased our reliance on fresh produce.
Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 (the Uniform Guidance) and use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Internal controls should be designed to ensure compliance with these federal requirements.Additionally, contracts involving federal funds must include certain provisions of Appendix II part 200. Condition: The Child Nutrition Program is administered for the School Board by the CNP department. The Department’s purchase of produce products was not subjected to bidding or other means of competitive solicitation in accordance with the Unform Guidance. Additionally, the contracts with vendors do not include the provisions contained in Appendix II part 200. Universe/ Population: Food purchases subject to the procurement regulations totaled approximately $1,000,000, among 5 vendors, of which 4 contracts totaling $800,000 were subject to audit. Of the 4 audited, 1 contract with purchases totaling $120,000 for the fiscal year was found to be non-compliant. Effect: The School Board may be non-compliant with the Uniform Guidance with respect to this contract for produce products. Cause: A shortage of suppliers in the geographic area may have led to the decision to forego the pricing and/or bidding process. Recommendation: Pricing, bidding or other forms of solicitation allowed by the Uniform Guidance should be conducted by the School Board’s Child Nutrition Department. Contracts should be standardized to include the language and provisions of Appendix II part 200. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan: The Child Nutrition Supervisor acknowledges the finding regarding the purchase of produce products for SY 2022-23. There is only one regional produce distributor that successfully delivers to the Franklin Parish area with accurate invoices and timely deliveries based on past history. Due to staff changes and re-assignment of essential job functions, the produce bid was overlooked for this this year only. Moving forward, the CNP Supervisor bas established a procurement schedule for developing and revising necessary formal bids in compliance with Federal and State requirements and all CNP central office staff. During SY 2022-23, the Franklin Parish Child Nutrition Program experienced multiple shortages of canned and frozen vegetables and fruits. This made it essential to fill in with fresh produce to meet meal pattern requirements. This created a marked increase in the cost of the fresh produce available to us and increased our reliance on fresh produce.
Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 (the Uniform Guidance) and use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Internal controls should be designed to ensure compliance with these federal requirements.Additionally, contracts involving federal funds must include certain provisions of Appendix II part 200. Condition: The Child Nutrition Program is administered for the School Board by the CNP department. The Department’s purchase of produce products was not subjected to bidding or other means of competitive solicitation in accordance with the Unform Guidance. Additionally, the contracts with vendors do not include the provisions contained in Appendix II part 200. Universe/ Population: Food purchases subject to the procurement regulations totaled approximately $1,000,000, among 5 vendors, of which 4 contracts totaling $800,000 were subject to audit. Of the 4 audited, 1 contract with purchases totaling $120,000 for the fiscal year was found to be non-compliant. Effect: The School Board may be non-compliant with the Uniform Guidance with respect to this contract for produce products. Cause: A shortage of suppliers in the geographic area may have led to the decision to forego the pricing and/or bidding process. Recommendation: Pricing, bidding or other forms of solicitation allowed by the Uniform Guidance should be conducted by the School Board’s Child Nutrition Department. Contracts should be standardized to include the language and provisions of Appendix II part 200. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan: The Child Nutrition Supervisor acknowledges the finding regarding the purchase of produce products for SY 2022-23. There is only one regional produce distributor that successfully delivers to the Franklin Parish area with accurate invoices and timely deliveries based on past history. Due to staff changes and re-assignment of essential job functions, the produce bid was overlooked for this this year only. Moving forward, the CNP Supervisor bas established a procurement schedule for developing and revising necessary formal bids in compliance with Federal and State requirements and all CNP central office staff. During SY 2022-23, the Franklin Parish Child Nutrition Program experienced multiple shortages of canned and frozen vegetables and fruits. This made it essential to fill in with fresh produce to meet meal pattern requirements. This created a marked increase in the cost of the fresh produce available to us and increased our reliance on fresh produce.
Criteria: Contracts and subcontracts involving construction activity with federal funds are subject to the Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. As such, the School Board, as a subgrantee to the State of LA, must monitor its construction contractors through review of payrolls for payment of Davis Bacon Act prevailing wage requirements. Condition: The School Board conducted construction activities with the ESSER funds, including roofing, window replacements, and other, but did not monitor its contractors’ compliance with Davis Bacon wage requirements. Universe/ Population: Approximately $345,000 was spent on construction type activities that under projects that would have required monitoring. None of the contractors performing the activity were monitored. Effect: The School Board is non-compliant with the requirements to monitor its subrecipients with respect to Davis-Bacon compliance. Cause: Construction activities are rarely conducted with educationally related federal grants and the administration was unfamiliar with the requirements. Recommendation: The School Board should be wary of all grant requirements prior to acceptance of the grant award. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: The Federal Programs Director acknowledges that we were not compliant with the Davis-Bacon requirement concerning prevailing wages. This project was completed early in the process of receiving ESSER funding and we were unaware of the Davis-Bacon wage requirements. Moving forward, the Federal Programs department and the Business department will work together to ensure that all Davis-Bacon requirements are met.
Criteria: Contracts and subcontracts involving construction activity with federal funds are subject to the Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. As such, the School Board, as a subgrantee to the State of LA, must monitor its construction contractors through review of payrolls for payment of Davis Bacon Act prevailing wage requirements. Condition: The School Board conducted construction activities with the ESSER funds, including roofing, window replacements, and other, but did not monitor its contractors’ compliance with Davis Bacon wage requirements. Universe/ Population: Approximately $345,000 was spent on construction type activities that under projects that would have required monitoring. None of the contractors performing the activity were monitored. Effect: The School Board is non-compliant with the requirements to monitor its subrecipients with respect to Davis-Bacon compliance. Cause: Construction activities are rarely conducted with educationally related federal grants and the administration was unfamiliar with the requirements. Recommendation: The School Board should be wary of all grant requirements prior to acceptance of the grant award. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: The Federal Programs Director acknowledges that we were not compliant with the Davis-Bacon requirement concerning prevailing wages. This project was completed early in the process of receiving ESSER funding and we were unaware of the Davis-Bacon wage requirements. Moving forward, the Federal Programs department and the Business department will work together to ensure that all Davis-Bacon requirements are met.
Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 (the Uniform Guidance) and use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Internal controls should be designed to ensure compliance with these federal requirements.Additionally, contracts involving federal funds must include certain provisions of Appendix II part 200. Condition: The Child Nutrition Program is administered for the School Board by the CNP department. The Department’s purchase of produce products was not subjected to bidding or other means of competitive solicitation in accordance with the Unform Guidance. Additionally, the contracts with vendors do not include the provisions contained in Appendix II part 200. Universe/ Population: Food purchases subject to the procurement regulations totaled approximately $1,000,000, among 5 vendors, of which 4 contracts totaling $800,000 were subject to audit. Of the 4 audited, 1 contract with purchases totaling $120,000 for the fiscal year was found to be non-compliant. Effect: The School Board may be non-compliant with the Uniform Guidance with respect to this contract for produce products. Cause: A shortage of suppliers in the geographic area may have led to the decision to forego the pricing and/or bidding process. Recommendation: Pricing, bidding or other forms of solicitation allowed by the Uniform Guidance should be conducted by the School Board’s Child Nutrition Department. Contracts should be standardized to include the language and provisions of Appendix II part 200. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan: The Child Nutrition Supervisor acknowledges the finding regarding the purchase of produce products for SY 2022-23. There is only one regional produce distributor that successfully delivers to the Franklin Parish area with accurate invoices and timely deliveries based on past history. Due to staff changes and re-assignment of essential job functions, the produce bid was overlooked for this this year only. Moving forward, the CNP Supervisor bas established a procurement schedule for developing and revising necessary formal bids in compliance with Federal and State requirements and all CNP central office staff. During SY 2022-23, the Franklin Parish Child Nutrition Program experienced multiple shortages of canned and frozen vegetables and fruits. This made it essential to fill in with fresh produce to meet meal pattern requirements. This created a marked increase in the cost of the fresh produce available to us and increased our reliance on fresh produce.
Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 (the Uniform Guidance) and use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Internal controls should be designed to ensure compliance with these federal requirements.Additionally, contracts involving federal funds must include certain provisions of Appendix II part 200. Condition: The Child Nutrition Program is administered for the School Board by the CNP department. The Department’s purchase of produce products was not subjected to bidding or other means of competitive solicitation in accordance with the Unform Guidance. Additionally, the contracts with vendors do not include the provisions contained in Appendix II part 200. Universe/ Population: Food purchases subject to the procurement regulations totaled approximately $1,000,000, among 5 vendors, of which 4 contracts totaling $800,000 were subject to audit. Of the 4 audited, 1 contract with purchases totaling $120,000 for the fiscal year was found to be non-compliant. Effect: The School Board may be non-compliant with the Uniform Guidance with respect to this contract for produce products. Cause: A shortage of suppliers in the geographic area may have led to the decision to forego the pricing and/or bidding process. Recommendation: Pricing, bidding or other forms of solicitation allowed by the Uniform Guidance should be conducted by the School Board’s Child Nutrition Department. Contracts should be standardized to include the language and provisions of Appendix II part 200. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan: The Child Nutrition Supervisor acknowledges the finding regarding the purchase of produce products for SY 2022-23. There is only one regional produce distributor that successfully delivers to the Franklin Parish area with accurate invoices and timely deliveries based on past history. Due to staff changes and re-assignment of essential job functions, the produce bid was overlooked for this this year only. Moving forward, the CNP Supervisor bas established a procurement schedule for developing and revising necessary formal bids in compliance with Federal and State requirements and all CNP central office staff. During SY 2022-23, the Franklin Parish Child Nutrition Program experienced multiple shortages of canned and frozen vegetables and fruits. This made it essential to fill in with fresh produce to meet meal pattern requirements. This created a marked increase in the cost of the fresh produce available to us and increased our reliance on fresh produce.
Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 (the Uniform Guidance) and use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Internal controls should be designed to ensure compliance with these federal requirements.Additionally, contracts involving federal funds must include certain provisions of Appendix II part 200. Condition: The Child Nutrition Program is administered for the School Board by the CNP department. The Department’s purchase of produce products was not subjected to bidding or other means of competitive solicitation in accordance with the Unform Guidance. Additionally, the contracts with vendors do not include the provisions contained in Appendix II part 200. Universe/ Population: Food purchases subject to the procurement regulations totaled approximately $1,000,000, among 5 vendors, of which 4 contracts totaling $800,000 were subject to audit. Of the 4 audited, 1 contract with purchases totaling $120,000 for the fiscal year was found to be non-compliant. Effect: The School Board may be non-compliant with the Uniform Guidance with respect to this contract for produce products. Cause: A shortage of suppliers in the geographic area may have led to the decision to forego the pricing and/or bidding process. Recommendation: Pricing, bidding or other forms of solicitation allowed by the Uniform Guidance should be conducted by the School Board’s Child Nutrition Department. Contracts should be standardized to include the language and provisions of Appendix II part 200. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan: The Child Nutrition Supervisor acknowledges the finding regarding the purchase of produce products for SY 2022-23. There is only one regional produce distributor that successfully delivers to the Franklin Parish area with accurate invoices and timely deliveries based on past history. Due to staff changes and re-assignment of essential job functions, the produce bid was overlooked for this this year only. Moving forward, the CNP Supervisor bas established a procurement schedule for developing and revising necessary formal bids in compliance with Federal and State requirements and all CNP central office staff. During SY 2022-23, the Franklin Parish Child Nutrition Program experienced multiple shortages of canned and frozen vegetables and fruits. This made it essential to fill in with fresh produce to meet meal pattern requirements. This created a marked increase in the cost of the fresh produce available to us and increased our reliance on fresh produce.
Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 (the Uniform Guidance) and use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Internal controls should be designed to ensure compliance with these federal requirements.Additionally, contracts involving federal funds must include certain provisions of Appendix II part 200. Condition: The Child Nutrition Program is administered for the School Board by the CNP department. The Department’s purchase of produce products was not subjected to bidding or other means of competitive solicitation in accordance with the Unform Guidance. Additionally, the contracts with vendors do not include the provisions contained in Appendix II part 200. Universe/ Population: Food purchases subject to the procurement regulations totaled approximately $1,000,000, among 5 vendors, of which 4 contracts totaling $800,000 were subject to audit. Of the 4 audited, 1 contract with purchases totaling $120,000 for the fiscal year was found to be non-compliant. Effect: The School Board may be non-compliant with the Uniform Guidance with respect to this contract for produce products. Cause: A shortage of suppliers in the geographic area may have led to the decision to forego the pricing and/or bidding process. Recommendation: Pricing, bidding or other forms of solicitation allowed by the Uniform Guidance should be conducted by the School Board’s Child Nutrition Department. Contracts should be standardized to include the language and provisions of Appendix II part 200. View of Responsible Official and Corrective Action Plan: The Child Nutrition Supervisor acknowledges the finding regarding the purchase of produce products for SY 2022-23. There is only one regional produce distributor that successfully delivers to the Franklin Parish area with accurate invoices and timely deliveries based on past history. Due to staff changes and re-assignment of essential job functions, the produce bid was overlooked for this this year only. Moving forward, the CNP Supervisor bas established a procurement schedule for developing and revising necessary formal bids in compliance with Federal and State requirements and all CNP central office staff. During SY 2022-23, the Franklin Parish Child Nutrition Program experienced multiple shortages of canned and frozen vegetables and fruits. This made it essential to fill in with fresh produce to meet meal pattern requirements. This created a marked increase in the cost of the fresh produce available to us and increased our reliance on fresh produce.
Criteria: Contracts and subcontracts involving construction activity with federal funds are subject to the Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. As such, the School Board, as a subgrantee to the State of LA, must monitor its construction contractors through review of payrolls for payment of Davis Bacon Act prevailing wage requirements. Condition: The School Board conducted construction activities with the ESSER funds, including roofing, window replacements, and other, but did not monitor its contractors’ compliance with Davis Bacon wage requirements. Universe/ Population: Approximately $345,000 was spent on construction type activities that under projects that would have required monitoring. None of the contractors performing the activity were monitored. Effect: The School Board is non-compliant with the requirements to monitor its subrecipients with respect to Davis-Bacon compliance. Cause: Construction activities are rarely conducted with educationally related federal grants and the administration was unfamiliar with the requirements. Recommendation: The School Board should be wary of all grant requirements prior to acceptance of the grant award. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: The Federal Programs Director acknowledges that we were not compliant with the Davis-Bacon requirement concerning prevailing wages. This project was completed early in the process of receiving ESSER funding and we were unaware of the Davis-Bacon wage requirements. Moving forward, the Federal Programs department and the Business department will work together to ensure that all Davis-Bacon requirements are met.