Audit 10852

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$5.85M
Findings
6
Programs
5
Organization: City of Albemarle (NC)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-01-10

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
8216 2023-002 Material Weakness Yes I
8217 2023-003 Material Weakness Yes E
8218 2023-004 Material Weakness - A
584658 2023-002 Material Weakness Yes I
584659 2023-003 Material Weakness Yes E
584660 2023-004 Material Weakness - A

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $3.54M Yes 0
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $996,704 - 0
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $749,487 Yes 3
66.458 Capitalization Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds $258,950 - 0
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $74,810 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
QJ2BQDUS2M63 Jacob Weavil Auditee
7049849446 Erica Brown Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The City has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards (SEFSA) includes the federal and state grant activity of the City of Albemarle under the programs of the federal government and the State of North Carolina for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this SEFSA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards and the State Single Audit Implementation Act. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City of Albemarle, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of the City of Albemarle.
Title: LOANS OUTSTANDING Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The City has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The City of Albemarle had the following loan balances outstanding at June 30, 2023 for loans that the grantor/pass-passthrough grantor has still imposed continuing compliance requirements. Loans outstanding at the beginning of the year and loans made during the year are included in the SEFSA. The balance of loans outstanding at June 30, 2023 consist of: Program Title AL Number Pass-Through Grantor's Number Amount Outstanding Clean Water State Revolving Fund (Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation, Phase 3) 66.458 CS370522-07 $0 Clean Water State Revolving Fund (Long Creek WTTP Treatment Process Rehab) 66.468 CS370522-08 $0

Finding Details

Findings and Questioned Costs Related to the Audit of Federal Awards Finding: 2023‐002 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development Program Name: Public Housing Operating Fund AL Number: 14.850 Material Weakness, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that procurement policies are implemented and functioning as intended. Management must monitor activities under federal awards to assure compliance with federal requirements. Condition: The City implemented procurement policies that conforms with applicable federal and state laws. However, the City’s internal controls over micro-purchases were not functioning as intended. Context: During our testing, we examined 9 purchases and determined that 7 purchases in the micro-purchases threshold did not follow the City’s policy. Expenditures were pre-audited prior to payment; however purchase orders were not completed as required by the City’s policy. Effect: Purchases may be made without the proper procurement approvals. Cause: Due to the turnover in the housing department, there were instances where a proper purchase order was not created for approval. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is a modified, repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2022-003. Questioned Cost: None. This finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, questioned costs are not applicable. Recommendation: The City should have a system in place to ensure that the procurement policies are implemented and functioning as intended. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to the Audit of Federal Awards (continued) Finding: 2023‐003 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development Program Name: Public Housing Operating Fund AL Number: 14.850 Non-Material Non‐Compliance Material Weakness, Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that applicants have all required documentation in their file. In accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 Subpart F, the City must maintain documentation to support tenant eligibility. Condition: The Public Housing Department did not follow procedures to ensure the proper eligibility determination were made and documented. Context: Of the 185 applicants during the current year valued at $749,487, we examined 37 (valued at $133,566) and determined that 1 (1% valued at $3,610) applicant was not supported with case documentation to confirm eligibility. We also determined that two applicants (6% valued at $7,220) had inconsistent documentation supporting eligibility determination in the case file. Upon further review, these two applicants were deemed eligible. Effect: Participants could receive benefits for which they are not eligible. Cause: Weakness in implementation of controls over eligibility procedures. Due to the turnover in the housing department, the City failed to obtain or retain the completed eligibility documentation. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is a modified, repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2022-004. Questioned Cost: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, auditors are required to report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000. Even though the sample results only identified $3,610 in questioned costs, if tests were extended to the entire population, questioned costs could exceed $25,000. Recommendation: Management should adhere to the program’s policy and maintain proper eligibility documentation in the applicant’s file. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to the Audit of Federal Awards (continued) Finding: 2023‐004 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development Program Name: Public Housing Operating Fund AL Number: 14.850 Material Non-Compliance Material Weakness, Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that activities allowed and allowable cost policies are implemented and functioning as intended. Management must monitor activities under federal awards to assure compliance with federal requirements. Management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to properly review and assess the eligibility of payroll costs to ensure the accuracy of the payroll costs charged is within program requirements. In accordance with 24 CRF section 990, verification of accuracy of information used in determining payroll costs to be charged to the program should be maintained. Condition: Due to a network event, the disaster recovery plan was not sufficient to recover documents on a timely manner. As a result, the approved payroll time sheets were not recovered. Context: Of the 1,540 expenditures during the current year valued at $749,487, we examined 40 (valued at $134,796) and determined that 7 (18% valued at $13,369) expenditures did not have proper documentation to support accuracy of payroll costs. Effect: Salaries allocated to the program did not have approved time sheets to verify the accuracy of the hours charged. Cause: Due to the network event, the timesheets were not recovered. Questioned Cost: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, auditors are required to report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000. Even though the sample results only identified $13,369 in known questioned costs, if tests were extended to the entire population, questioned costs could exceed $25,000. Recommendation: Management should strengthen internal control procedures over activities allowed and allowable costs and strengthen the disaster recovery plan. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to the Audit of Federal Awards Finding: 2023‐002 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development Program Name: Public Housing Operating Fund AL Number: 14.850 Material Weakness, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that procurement policies are implemented and functioning as intended. Management must monitor activities under federal awards to assure compliance with federal requirements. Condition: The City implemented procurement policies that conforms with applicable federal and state laws. However, the City’s internal controls over micro-purchases were not functioning as intended. Context: During our testing, we examined 9 purchases and determined that 7 purchases in the micro-purchases threshold did not follow the City’s policy. Expenditures were pre-audited prior to payment; however purchase orders were not completed as required by the City’s policy. Effect: Purchases may be made without the proper procurement approvals. Cause: Due to the turnover in the housing department, there were instances where a proper purchase order was not created for approval. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is a modified, repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2022-003. Questioned Cost: None. This finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, questioned costs are not applicable. Recommendation: The City should have a system in place to ensure that the procurement policies are implemented and functioning as intended. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to the Audit of Federal Awards (continued) Finding: 2023‐003 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development Program Name: Public Housing Operating Fund AL Number: 14.850 Non-Material Non‐Compliance Material Weakness, Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that applicants have all required documentation in their file. In accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 Subpart F, the City must maintain documentation to support tenant eligibility. Condition: The Public Housing Department did not follow procedures to ensure the proper eligibility determination were made and documented. Context: Of the 185 applicants during the current year valued at $749,487, we examined 37 (valued at $133,566) and determined that 1 (1% valued at $3,610) applicant was not supported with case documentation to confirm eligibility. We also determined that two applicants (6% valued at $7,220) had inconsistent documentation supporting eligibility determination in the case file. Upon further review, these two applicants were deemed eligible. Effect: Participants could receive benefits for which they are not eligible. Cause: Weakness in implementation of controls over eligibility procedures. Due to the turnover in the housing department, the City failed to obtain or retain the completed eligibility documentation. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is a modified, repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2022-004. Questioned Cost: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, auditors are required to report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000. Even though the sample results only identified $3,610 in questioned costs, if tests were extended to the entire population, questioned costs could exceed $25,000. Recommendation: Management should adhere to the program’s policy and maintain proper eligibility documentation in the applicant’s file. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Findings and Questioned Costs Related to the Audit of Federal Awards (continued) Finding: 2023‐004 U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development Program Name: Public Housing Operating Fund AL Number: 14.850 Material Non-Compliance Material Weakness, Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that activities allowed and allowable cost policies are implemented and functioning as intended. Management must monitor activities under federal awards to assure compliance with federal requirements. Management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to properly review and assess the eligibility of payroll costs to ensure the accuracy of the payroll costs charged is within program requirements. In accordance with 24 CRF section 990, verification of accuracy of information used in determining payroll costs to be charged to the program should be maintained. Condition: Due to a network event, the disaster recovery plan was not sufficient to recover documents on a timely manner. As a result, the approved payroll time sheets were not recovered. Context: Of the 1,540 expenditures during the current year valued at $749,487, we examined 40 (valued at $134,796) and determined that 7 (18% valued at $13,369) expenditures did not have proper documentation to support accuracy of payroll costs. Effect: Salaries allocated to the program did not have approved time sheets to verify the accuracy of the hours charged. Cause: Due to the network event, the timesheets were not recovered. Questioned Cost: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, auditors are required to report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000. Even though the sample results only identified $13,369 in known questioned costs, if tests were extended to the entire population, questioned costs could exceed $25,000. Recommendation: Management should strengthen internal control procedures over activities allowed and allowable costs and strengthen the disaster recovery plan. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The City agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.