Audit 105

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$1.32M
Findings
4
Programs
4
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2023-10-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
87 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes M
88 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes M
576529 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes M
576530 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes M

Contacts

Name Title Type
C4MTUFN6LG63 Matt Brumfield Auditee
5633594757 Matt Brumfield Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note A – Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule represents only a selected portion of the operations of The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa.
Title: Note B – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Note C – Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Note D – Subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa did not provide federal awards to subrecipients during the year ended June 30, 2023.
Title: Note E – Insurance and Loan Guarantees Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa had no insurance in effect, relating to federal funds, for the year ending June 30, 2023. The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa had no loans or loan guarantees, relating to federal funds, outstanding at June 30, 2023.

Finding Details

2023–001: On–Site Monitoring Department of Agriculture Pass through Iowa Department of Education 10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Federal Award Year: 2023 Finding: The Organization did not perform all of the required on–site monitoring visits during the grant period. Criteria: CACFP sponsoring organizations must review each facility three times each year and: 1) at least two of the three reviews must be unannounced; 2) at least one unannounced review must include observation of meal service; 3) at least one review must be made during each new facility’s first four weeks of program operations and 4) not more than six months may elapse between reviews. In response to COVID–19, the Food and Nutrition Service waived several of the requirements related to site visits. However, the Organization was still required to perform two facility visits a year and visit a new facility at least once within the first four weeks of program operations. Condition and Context: During our review and testing of facility visits performed by The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa, we noted the required minimum visits were not performed for the last quarter of the grant period (7/1/22–9/30/22), due to timing of when the prior year’s corrective action plan was implemented. Cause: Due to limitations and difficulties from COVID–19, the Organization did not perform all of the required facility visits during the grant period. Effect: The Organization did not meet the grant’s requirement for facility visits. Questions Costs: $–0– Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2022–001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization develop a facility monitoring process in accordance with the grant requirements. The process should be reviewed by an individual of management that is not involved with performing the facility visits. Response and Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has implemented a facility monitoring program that incorporates all of the facility visit requirements as described in the grant agreement. Conclusion: Response accepted
2023–001: On–Site Monitoring Department of Agriculture Pass through Iowa Department of Education 10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Federal Award Year: 2023 Finding: The Organization did not perform all of the required on–site monitoring visits during the grant period. Criteria: CACFP sponsoring organizations must review each facility three times each year and: 1) at least two of the three reviews must be unannounced; 2) at least one unannounced review must include observation of meal service; 3) at least one review must be made during each new facility’s first four weeks of program operations and 4) not more than six months may elapse between reviews. In response to COVID–19, the Food and Nutrition Service waived several of the requirements related to site visits. However, the Organization was still required to perform two facility visits a year and visit a new facility at least once within the first four weeks of program operations. Condition and Context: During our review and testing of facility visits performed by The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa, we noted the required minimum visits were not performed for the last quarter of the grant period (7/1/22–9/30/22), due to timing of when the prior year’s corrective action plan was implemented. Cause: Due to limitations and difficulties from COVID–19, the Organization did not perform all of the required facility visits during the grant period. Effect: The Organization did not meet the grant’s requirement for facility visits. Questions Costs: $–0– Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2022–001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization develop a facility monitoring process in accordance with the grant requirements. The process should be reviewed by an individual of management that is not involved with performing the facility visits. Response and Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has implemented a facility monitoring program that incorporates all of the facility visit requirements as described in the grant agreement. Conclusion: Response accepted
2023–001: On–Site Monitoring Department of Agriculture Pass through Iowa Department of Education 10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Federal Award Year: 2023 Finding: The Organization did not perform all of the required on–site monitoring visits during the grant period. Criteria: CACFP sponsoring organizations must review each facility three times each year and: 1) at least two of the three reviews must be unannounced; 2) at least one unannounced review must include observation of meal service; 3) at least one review must be made during each new facility’s first four weeks of program operations and 4) not more than six months may elapse between reviews. In response to COVID–19, the Food and Nutrition Service waived several of the requirements related to site visits. However, the Organization was still required to perform two facility visits a year and visit a new facility at least once within the first four weeks of program operations. Condition and Context: During our review and testing of facility visits performed by The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa, we noted the required minimum visits were not performed for the last quarter of the grant period (7/1/22–9/30/22), due to timing of when the prior year’s corrective action plan was implemented. Cause: Due to limitations and difficulties from COVID–19, the Organization did not perform all of the required facility visits during the grant period. Effect: The Organization did not meet the grant’s requirement for facility visits. Questions Costs: $–0– Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2022–001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization develop a facility monitoring process in accordance with the grant requirements. The process should be reviewed by an individual of management that is not involved with performing the facility visits. Response and Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has implemented a facility monitoring program that incorporates all of the facility visit requirements as described in the grant agreement. Conclusion: Response accepted
2023–001: On–Site Monitoring Department of Agriculture Pass through Iowa Department of Education 10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Federal Award Year: 2023 Finding: The Organization did not perform all of the required on–site monitoring visits during the grant period. Criteria: CACFP sponsoring organizations must review each facility three times each year and: 1) at least two of the three reviews must be unannounced; 2) at least one unannounced review must include observation of meal service; 3) at least one review must be made during each new facility’s first four weeks of program operations and 4) not more than six months may elapse between reviews. In response to COVID–19, the Food and Nutrition Service waived several of the requirements related to site visits. However, the Organization was still required to perform two facility visits a year and visit a new facility at least once within the first four weeks of program operations. Condition and Context: During our review and testing of facility visits performed by The Friendly House of Davenport, Iowa, we noted the required minimum visits were not performed for the last quarter of the grant period (7/1/22–9/30/22), due to timing of when the prior year’s corrective action plan was implemented. Cause: Due to limitations and difficulties from COVID–19, the Organization did not perform all of the required facility visits during the grant period. Effect: The Organization did not meet the grant’s requirement for facility visits. Questions Costs: $–0– Identification as a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding of 2022–001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization develop a facility monitoring process in accordance with the grant requirements. The process should be reviewed by an individual of management that is not involved with performing the facility visits. Response and Corrective Action Planned: The Organization has implemented a facility monitoring program that incorporates all of the facility visit requirements as described in the grant agreement. Conclusion: Response accepted